Frage von Axel_1972:
Hello,
I will in a few days filming a presentation, the language is with a diversity radio system via Lavaliermikro recorded. Now the question arises whether it is more sensible, the O-with sound directly to DV tape's record or a separate recording (eg with a laptop) to manufacture and later in the section to be synchronized? I have diesbezgl. no experience and would like of you Pros / Cons hear?
Thank you. AX.
Antwort von Markus:
Hello Axel,
if the sound together with the associated Picture directly with the video camera is included, then you have no additional work with the sync anymore.
What should be the disadvantage to have?
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
If a device with better SNR, or a converter has higher, I would prefer the external device. When DV is one synonymous to 2 channel, 16 bit is limited to 48KHz.
Other reasons for external solutions could be that the device is faster and more precisely synonymous disqualify it.
That is the first thing my mind.
Antwort von Klaus Zimmer:
Hi. I would have a question synonymous (Markus?). Current radio systems have XLR or Lineanschluesse / mono. Speaks something against this signal directly into the camcorder to bring (eg, 6.3mm or XLR Monoklinke to 3.5mm stereo jack) or you will get because of problems with Signalstaerke, interference, etc.?
Klaus.
Antwort von Markus:
If a device with better SNR, or a higher conversion has ... Okay, that's an argument. On the other hand, I find two channels in a presentation always sufficient and more than 48 kHz and 16 bits needs to maintain current distribution formats (most DVD-Video) not be synonymous.
Speaks something about this [xlr] signal directly into the camcorder to bring (eg, 6.3mm or XLR Monoklinke to 3.5mm stereo jack) ...? Hi Klaus,
It speaks nothing to the balanced microphone signal to an unbalanced 3.5 mm TRS to adapt, however, one must keep in s.die Beschaltungspläne. From a 3-pin XLR connector is not a 3-pin plug, but a 2-pole!
zum Bild
Antwort von Klaus Zimmer:
Thanks Markus. Your proposal is but a 'Monoanschluss', right? I voted yes on Diversity Receiver either XLR or mono line and would then go into the camcorder, with the 3.5mm stereo jack equipped.
Can I use the using (standard) adapter and it would then connect the XLR output (radio receiver) to the starting line to be preferred?
Gruss. Klaus.
Antwort von Flashlight:
Hello,
I will in a few days filming a presentation, the language is with a diversity radio system via Lavaliermikro recorded. Now the question arises whether it is more sensible, the O-with sound directly to DV tape's record or a separate recording (eg with a laptop) to manufacture and later in the section to be synchronized? I have diesbezgl. no experience and would like of you Pros / Cons hear?
Thank you. AX. Remember that you are in the maximum as long as your camcorder can record sound like on tape's suits - usually 1 hour max. If the presentation more than an hour, is the sound of the band while holding shift away. Pictures can be seen in the fall always somehow bridge (eg a second hand camera or insertion of an information table / slide, etc.). When it comes to a brief presentation is of course critical.
Greeting of flash.
Antwort von Markus:
Your proposal is but a 'Monoanschluss', right? A 3-pin XLR connection is always mono, so a single audio channel. Stereo is either 2x XLR 3-pole or 1 x 5-pin transfer.
Voice recordings are usually always mono and later equally on both stereo channels. This takes the viewer to the center speaker is always precisely true, and will not (sometimes inappropriate) Links-/Rechts-Verschiebungen irritated.
In order for a consumer camcorder, the Language right on both stereo channels incorporated, is an adapter of mono to stereo needed. Of course one can imagine the aforementioned XLR jack adapter synonymous according to procure the same old, by the wanted (XLR pin 2) almost to the top of the ring and plug sets.
... would be the XLR output (radio receiver) to the starting line to be preferred? It depends of your options / adapters and the host device. Camcorders do not usually allow that the picture through this lens and absorbs the sound from Line-Input abgreift. It would therefore only an adaptation of means of resistance line at microphone level, so that the signal distortion s.Mikrofoneingang plays can be admitted.
However, if the distance from the receiver to your camcorder, a longer (!) Requires cable, then the unbalanced line-level connection of unbalanced microphone connection is preferable. The resistor should be in this case immediately before the camcorder is so that the higher level on the signal line is located and electromagnetic interference is relatively low impact.
