Newsmeldung von slashCAM:This is news to report with pictures and link to the pages slashCAM Magazine
Antwort von the_flasher:
It is always interesting. I have always been for the Canon 7D
interest because of the video function, they did not want to buy for the high price. The Canon 550D seems basically to be exactly what I've always been waiting for. So I'm optimistic about the action.
Antwort von mekong:
Just like me. I look forward to this thing. The 7D me was too expensive, given the fact that I already have a HG20 and have a DSLR. Here comes my 550D just right. Can not wait. But would wait a couple of times before testing.
Someone nen proposal for a first lens?
Antwort von the_flasher:
currently I have only one lens. Tamron 17-50/2.8. I'm very satisfied so far, except for the sound of the autofocus motor. You take it but it was clear when it is quiet time in space.
But look at me, as it is s.der working 550D in video mode. To me, but soon grow a little Brighter and especially with longer focal.
Antwort von mekong:
Synonymous've already read many good things about the Tamron. And if I understood everything correctly, is yes autofocus and video on DSLRs already a chapter in itself.
Antwort von Valentino:
Wow 330Mb/Min is the hammer ;-)
It is then synonymous no preference if you are such a Tamron shard turn screws.
S-RAW with at least 1GB per minute should already be there.
Antwort von marcszeglat:
uh, probably because someone has to have substantially lost! AVCHD - Standard is limited to 24 megabits / s limited! In addition, there should be someone with views of the conversion of bits and bytes to become familiar. 24 Megabit / s is equal to about 3.6 mb / s!
Antwort von Gabriel_Natas:
who will make a mistake where?
MPEG4 / AVC h.264 is up to 960mbit / s specified. So / s 120megabyte;).
There is still much space to the top: D
Antwort von rush:
It is then synonymous no preference if you are such a Tamron shard turn screws.
Always these prejudices against the lenses of third-party ... I think somehow silly but ok know - everyone must own
Antwort von Valentino:
@ Rush
I have itself an Optics of a third-party (new Sigma 24-70 2.8), but the optics synonymous halt what it promises.
Because here is a photo shop around the corner, such an action on 25 percent had new Sigma lenses, I paid just over 600 euros, but get a really good synonymous Optics.
The Tamron has become over the years, much better, but Canon and Sigma s.Nikon'm simply not tuned.
Antwort von Valentino:
@ Rush
I have itself an Optics of a third-party, the new Sigma 24-70 2.8.
Because here is a photo shop around the corner as a 25 percent had action on new Sigma lenses, I paid just over 600 euros, but get a really good synonymous Optics.
The Tamron has become over the years, much better, but Canon and Sigma s.Nikon'm simply not tuned.
