Frage von diditalo:
Hi all, I'm new here in the forum and would like to buy myself in the near future a HD cam.
The offer is indeed very large, but right now I have a tendency to a Sony cam.
Currently, the ADC 305 or the HDR are cx cx 505 on my wish list. Which are currently priced in a similar range. Now, the question of whether the 305, as in 2010-he Model Comparison for 505 as 2009-model which he has altered important. Me are there really as essential points of the improved wide-angle, the 24-bit rate, he and the compatibility with SDHC cards in the 305-he noticed. In contrast, a better image sensor and a possibly better LowLightverhalten in the 505-he stands.
As you can see das Which would you buy?
Vielen Dank schon mal
Greeting
Jurgen
Antwort von Jott:
Wide Angleschlägt everything. Clear case.
Antwort von actaion:
The advantages of the 305 have you already well known.
The benefits would be the 505, besides the previously mentioned larger sensor (better in lowlight,) better Freistellmöglichkeiten:
- Larger display
- Double the internal memory (32GB)
- Higher resolution photo
- More tele
- Remote control while
- Nightshot mode
- Favorable Batteries
- Micro-input and headphones output
The Wide Angleist a strong argument for the 305, but the rest of my opinion speaks clearly to the 505th
505 I would prefer to manage the wide Anglekann one indeed with one converter.
Antwort von Freddi:
...
The benefits would be the 505, ...
- Micro-input and headphones output
... Headset jack, the CX505 is not synonymous - Micro goes over the Active Interface Shoe (Sony original, or with third-party adapter) ...
Whether the difference between 17 and 24 Mbps actually sees, I doubt (I leave with practical examples, however, like to teach).
Real advantage is really only the larger WW ... And the can easily make up with one converter.
Antwort von diditalo:
Hello,
have again, thanks for your answers.
Is there up to the above technical differences (Optics, stabilizer, ..) because no difference between the two of Cam's?
How's that one with Converter?
Can I, when the zoom is draufgeschraubt normally synonymous, and otherwise use all the features of the action? And how it looks when I'm in the Cam then an underwater housing? Are there problems with one converter? I have looked at times on the Sony a couple of HP, the VCL HGA least 07A would be priced into question. Knows the person, or someone has a suggestion?
I'm sorry for the many questions, but for me it's everything still uncharted territory. Will change, however, synonymous only times when I own a cam.
Greeting
Jurgen
Antwort von actaion:
How's that one with Converter?
Can I, when the zoom is draufgeschraubt normally synonymous, and otherwise use all the features of the action? Yes, everything is normal. Except perhaps that the Flash cover (for photos only) is. UW housing, I do not know me from.
Antwort von Freddi:
... UW housing, I do not know me from. But I - :-)
You have two options:
1. There are (Universal) housing having a flat port (large front wheel) and the camcorder did you mount, usually a multiple perforated plate - there you can reintun your camcorder along with WW.
2. Change port enclosure with system
They are usually halbuniverselle or special housing - where you then change the front optics (ie against a WW or a macro)
Option 1 is usually less expensive in purchase price and can usually be synonymous still used for future camcorder - disadvantage: You have most sellers are very rudimentary control functions (An) From Start Stop Zoom Stillimage.
Have you thought thee times what may cost your (future) case?
Antwort von diditalo:
Hey,
I had already been triggered once for the Sony-Cam's synonymous Sonyangeschaut of the underwater housing, which should then still synonymous with converter or?
The UW-housing of Sony cost around 200 ¬ so that is ok for me, if it were synonymous then yes, the "factory warranty" has, when you make the cam should be wet.
Which of your options will include the original UW-housing of Sony?
Greeting
Jurgen
Antwort von Freddi:
... Which of your options will include the original UW-housing of Sony? ... Mh ... None at all really about.
They are "recreational" housing - that is good against sand, dust and splash water.
In the water, they are only used while snorkeling, as they are waterproof only up to 5 meters.
If I had to classify them but I would say that there are universal housing - and have, unfortunately, synonymous only oseingeschränkten operating functions - for snorkeling but you need no longer be synonymous.
However, I do not know which one rinbekommt Cam along with the WW-Converter such a case - that the space is not enough.
And a "factory warranty" against wet is excluded already in the user guide of most UW housing - there's only a special insurance policy.
Antwort von diditalo:
So me go so a housing definitely times when I was on holiday synonymous only want to snorkel.
Otherwise I would not make such a housing synonymous to the action.
Bzgl. ds WW I would have to s.Besten times but Sony questions whether the Sports Pack are designed for something like that, or.
Need for the SLD at all under water while snorkeling, or is it perhaps not necessary?
Greeting
Jurgen
Antwort von Jott:
On the contrary, under the water changed very significantly in the direction of the focal telephoto. Actually, you need a fish-eye! :-)
About the topic Converter: 200 EUR ruined everything under the Picture. For the money saved - the new Sonys have WW s.Bord - you can skip right up one synonymous class.
Antwort von actaion:
On the contrary, under the water changed very significantly in the direction of the focal telephoto. Actually, you need a fish-eye! :-)
About the topic Converter: 200 EUR ruined everything under the Picture. For the money saved - the new Sonys have WW s.Bord - you can skip right up one synonymous class. well, the CX550, but is currently at 1200, which are not 200 (of the recommended sony HD converter will cost around 180 ¬), but 500 ¬ more ...
