Frage von Bruno Peter:
For HDready TV:
Thus it is still synonymous PAL to watch TV programs, many many more years, and obviously makes the appearance of PAL DV on TV HDready at high screen resolutions some non-negligible problems in image quality. The NDR has geräußpert this time:
PAL to HDTV display devices: The disadvantages:
The new HDTV-enabled TV devices outperform the standard picture in force today with their imaging capabilities significantly. PAL has less image information than HDTV display devices can. For the PAL signal is the Resolutioneines HDTV screen that with the "HDready" logo is indicated, much too high. The lack of image content is interpolated like digital zoom on digital cameras, so to speak, "blown up". The amount of emitted pixel is artificially extrapolated. The result is that the interpolation of the signal causes noise, shadows and blurs. So moderation is popular with the number of pixels, you do not want to stand side by side two television, one for PAL TV / DV and one for the 3% maybe 5% HDV HDTV + ...
http://www3.ndr.de/ndrtv_pages_std/0,3147,OID1214276_REF962,00.html
As far as I know, this issue in any forum yet been properly discussed.
What experiences have estimated that even experts gathered here, as this subject will be evaluated?
Antwort von Strahlemann:
A "modern" plasma or LCD has to scale internal synonymous with the skills - if you now the "correct" scaling of hand, it ceases to function could - provided that the internal signal path of the device permits it ...
Antwort von GhostDog:
This is almost the same as Kabbes 16:9: Almost None has such a television. We invested a lot money and more time to make a film in this great format. And no customer acknowledges that because he either a 4:3 television, or is too stupid, s.Playern the 16:9 playback and select TV. As long as it is not explicitly required turn, cut, and I authore in Pal 4:3.
MFG Peter
Antwort von Markus:
The LCD technology clearly scores at life, power consumption and image quality. [...] The interpolation of the signal causes noise, shadows and blurs. Hello,
who followed the technical development times and a plasma TV next to an LCD television has seen, knows that current plasma images are significantly more luminous and richer in contrast. Television is such that consume more electricity synonymous, but unfortunately true.
The ordinary PAL TV picture must be (on a high-resolution flat screen but not or no longer) look absolutely bad. Especially in recent times has done some things that has impacted positively on the image quality. The noise filters have become better and more efficient and a clean entrauschtes Picture is scalable synonymous of higher quality. Any Photoshop user knows the bicubic interpolation: they will deliver better results than a simple pixel doubling, but need more time to calculate synonymous. With improved electronics and more efficient software can be amazing from the 720 × 576 - pixel PAL get Picture.
A friend of me has, after long research and test's extensive television has the
Panasonic TH-42PV500E
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
The pixel count of 1,024 x 768 for a diagonal of 106cm is indeed synonymous not overly large. But what if PAL is located on 1920x1080?
Has anyone tested this already?
Antwort von Axel:
I think the Resolutionvon 720 x 1080 pixels for a plasma of 106 cm is ideal. Whoever has seen an HD picture on such a TV knows that any "more" than what is the cut and the post - or for people with complexes. If in addition the PAL picture is okay, moves even closer to the purchase ...
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
I like being
this device
Antwort von Markus:
Hi All,
I read yesterday on www.film-tv-video.de an interesting report on the perceived image quality of 720p and 1080i and the possible future developments.
Link
" for
Website
" zum
PDF (right click> save target as ...)
