Frage von Sven_Bötcher:
Hello,
I try my grade with Core2Duo with 2 x 2.8 GHz, an AVCHD-DVD
using Nero Vision to create. I am not even the
Material but simply cut the clips directly from the camcorder
in the DVD Project added. However, I have all
Quality settings to stop by. 4.5 hours transcoded
He now has 12.5 hours and he still wants.
Maybe someone of processed so you may already AVCHD and me
a PC equipped guess. I thought s.einen Core2Quad Q9550 with 4 GB
DDR3. Mags probably go a bit faster?
Bye
Sven
Antwort von Franz Schupp:
"Sven Bötcher"
wrote in news post
news: h0bufe $ FP2 $ 1@online.de ...
> Hello,
>
> I try with my grade Core2Duo with 2 x 2.8 GHz, an AVCHD-DVD
> Using Nero Vision to create.
I have roughly the same computer equipment, but use a different
Program.
For the creation of a rendering AVCHD requires approximately 30-fold season.
For the production of a Blu Ray disc is required to render approximately 12-fold
Season.
Most programs want to cut a 4-fold for a Processor
smooth preview.
Must be for this reason synonymous soon convert.
Gruß Franz
Antwort von Matthias Wendt:
Hello Sven,
Nero Vision I have not tried, only Edius5.0 and Sony Vegas 8.0pro
(there now with a new version, perhaps as quickly
has become). Both with a core-i7-920. Both programs use
According to Taskmanager all eight cores, so they are certainly faster with i7
as a Core Duo or an old quad, which is only four cores knowledge.
Lasts but remains forever and is not with DV
Compare.
In Edius, you have the possibility, however, in a different format to
transcode, then everything is much smoother then you only gibts
of course, the advantages (?) of AVCHD and have at least one
Coding stage more.
I find the preview image synonymous still choppy and actually
useless to the recording quality to be assessed.
So: Even if you have the fastest possible time to buy, it will
You do not really bring much joy. But maybe helps here
Mac? Or other, better software. Supposedly can CyberLink quite
well with AVCHD footage, who knows what exactly?
Greeting
Matthias
Antwort von Ralf- D. Grobe:
"Matthias Wendt" wrote in news post
Re: PC for AVCHD? # # #
> Hello Sven,
- Snip --
Moin,
the hardware experience I can share. As a new calculator anyway
was necessary, I like him for HDV dimensions: Intel7, 6GB
TriChannel RAM, 1TB Pladde ...
On Vista64bit run my "old" is no longer editing program. Since search
I am an alternative.
Under www.slashcam.de there are some interesting articles on the subject
Hardware and software for HDV.
I have little Corel VideoStudio X2 viewed as a test version.
Mature is the software yet. I hope for a new MSP.
What the Codiertempo and the Choice of the target formats are concerned, has given me the
Test Version of Adobe Premiere Elements very promised. It is really
Premiere knowhow drin.
CyberLink The thing was kind enough to the calculator here. The production
an AVCHD but I have only tried once.
Some software has in the processing of "normal" DVD format
mad pace on it, but as smooth as DV from your camcorder, the
DV editing of HDV garnicht. Even loading a video into
Editing program ... But unfortunately I had a new synonymous
Camcorders growth ;-)
On which devices is ye 'ne AVCHD from?
My standalone device or in my friend's circle can not.
Since I write either to cut HDVals. Mpg file to 'ne
DVD (well, any PC and many DVD players with the quality of reading),
or I create a standard DVD. And wait until Blu-Ray is acceptable.
Cutting and processing of HDV material has for the media world is still
Pioniererhaftes somewhat strained today's PCs and enormous. A
Super software, which makes the super fast, uses as synonymous nothing if it
the calculator does not exist yet. There are likely still a few years to go,
to the hardware that creates loose and the overall world consumption
the players have. But it still comes.
See you soon
Ralf
Antwort von Matthias Wendt:
"Ralf Grobe, D." wrote:
> On which devices is ye 'ne AVCHD from?
> My standalone device or in my friend's circle can not.
This was the second edition of the new camera for the new PC,
or actually the third, a new full-HD monitor with HDMI was
synonymous due. I got myself a standalone Blu-ray player and more
a burner purchased. I was originally of the
strangely mistaken assumption that we can further cut videos
as with DV problems to memory chip to the Camera
play back. If (as yet) not, no more than perhaps with the
grauslichen Beipackprogramm the Canon, which I do not
be.
If everything is not yet mature. But the videos are so
incomparably richer detail than the computer that I never regretted it
did.
I actually think that only a software problem. The
Hope dies last.
Greeting
Matthias
Antwort von Ralf- D. Grobe:
"Matthias Wendt" wrote in news post
Re: PC for AVCHD? # # #
> "Ralf Grobe, D." wrote:
- Snip --
> I was originally of the
> Strangely mistaken assumption that we can further cut videos
> Just as easily with computer memory chip to the Camera
> Back to play. If (as yet) not, no more than perhaps with the
> Grauslichen Beipackprogramm the Canon, which I do not
> Will.
Well, a chip (SD card or do you mean camera's internal memory?) Has
limited capacity. The recovery of the camera is primarily
with DV tapes interesting if in the long term should be archived. To
Reputation is the only latürnich a bad compromise. What did you
because increased? (I was Canon's HV20. I'd like to put XM2,
but had so synonymous Calculator new ...)
> If everything is not yet mature. But the videos are so
> Incomparably richer detail than the computer that I never regretted it
> Did.
* sign *
It is stupid holding that the moment someone a little self -
Silberling mitgeben can. And Blu-Ray at the moment already garnicht. Nevertheless
is one of my next investments BR burner ;-)
> I actually think that only a software problem. The
> Hope dies last.
> Greeting
> Matthias
The recovery on the camcorder is definitely a software problem,
when the camcorder is the general. I have not yet made
would be synonymous here but Premiere Elements trust (AFAIK, the option at
"Letter" of the video camcorder to the system proposed is essentially
a question of clean camera control software)
The processing speed remains a hardware problem. The lowest
Loss of time exists when the target format does not deviate from the source format. And
even then it takes quite a long time. This is synonymous not unusual: The Picture
of HDV is 4x as large as DV. DV is an avi container (single), HDV
is a mpg (rechenaufwändige interpolation). Initially, I have much larger
Capture files from the camcorder expected - which is responsible for the Compression
Video quality is quite high.
Remedy could be a "real" video workstation, the
mpg drivers with hardware support, but the prices for such plants
are indiskutabel for 'nen simple amateur.
BTW: Are you entirely on AVCHD sworn, or did it make you more intense with
the other encodings (eg H.264) apart?
Greeting
Ralf
Antwort von Matthias Wendt:
"Ralf Grobe, D." wrote:
> Well, a chip (SD card or do you mean camera's internal memory?) Has
> limited capacity. The recovery of the camera is primarily
> at DV tapes interesting if in the long term should be archived. To
> Latürnich reputation is only a bad compromise. What did you
> because increased? (I was Canon's HV20. I'd like to put XM2,
> but the calculator had so synonymous new ...)
I thought the cut videos for viewing on the
Chip back playing, and otherwise to approve its external
Record store. So yes meanwhile ne lot of it.
Goes with AVCHD video, because the beasts are not only from the
pure *. mts files exist, but much additional information from
other files are searched, with most of the camera to
Camera is different and therefore a problem for the
Software Manufacturer. Although my Panasonic Blue-ray player plays
Chips from the Canon HF-100 from trouble. But only if the
Additional files are in ne consequence of loose *. mts eats he does not.
> BTW: Are you entirely on AVCHD sworn, or did it make you more intense with
> other encodings (eg H.264) apart?
Certainly not sworn. Was rather a coincidence. I got on the slascam
Reviews reviewed as cut and stop the RF-100 was on IMHO
From best. Also it seems to me to actually make sense, imgleichen (?)
Format incorporated, later synonymous to BD is written.
Yes was warned before the effort, but warnings have me
never discouraged ;-). Let's look how it develops. I
'm longstanding Magix-User and grieve that the where with
AVCHD still does not work properly, how to read it, myself
I have the new version has not yet brought to trial must be
frightening.
Greeting
Matthias
