Infoseite // Panasonic AG-AF101 experience autofocus. For news and reportage for?



Frage von coreoperation:


Dear AF101 owner!

I'm even about to appoint me the camera. Now I'm still following questions. Since I work not only scenic, but much synonymous reportage and documentary, that is dependent on'm alone with a camera to capture pictures quickly good, I need a useful synonymous autofocus is fast and will not drain. How good is the camera for such a use for? 've Experience with the Canon XH A1 (autofocus quite okey ...) and the Lumix GH1 (inflated or GH13. Aufofokus very slowly ... and shoots out of his goal of driving back and then settles down at some point).

So now for my purposes, the Winner or Looser question. If the cam with auto focus synonymous suitable for the news section? Can I do with the fast autofocus precision panning to accompany a person in their movement (with the AF101 as a handheld camera) and auto keep focused? And besides, what else, other than prof. Sound and controls and hoffenltich a great autofocus makes them better in picture quality than a hacked or a GH1 GH2?

What alternative is there perhaps also for my purposes?

I especially found the autofocus on the internet unfortunately no useful tests or advice.

I am really very grateful for feedback!

Best regards,

Marco

Space


Antwort von pilskopf:

You will not come around to the 14-140mm Lens drum, which is really the only video optimized Lens for M4 / 3 That you may know already of the GH1. All other Lenses are even more manual for use. Drawback of the lens is the fourth top panel But at least you were so good very fast focus.

Space


Antwort von coreoperation:

Thank you for the quick reply!

The Lens I know. The question is whether this is a better autofocus is possible than with the GH1? An auto focus just as we know him of the former and current other video cameras. I understand the Resolutionund the field range is not that easy to get added. However, I wonder if the results with the AF101 can thus be neat.

Space


Antwort von pilskopf:

This should be with the AG101 as fast as with the GH2 and out of the AF is much faster now than with the GH1, I can not imagine that the AG101 is worse than the GH2 be the point. The fact that the sensor is read twice as fast as with the GH1 should just work that actually.

Space


Antwort von coreoperation:

Hmmm ... I could accept, in principle, synonymous a GH2 and recording the sound separately continue?

The GH1 can at this point probably aufpimpen no longer a faster autofocus to get?

Space


Antwort von rush:

One probably. you should try to manual focus you incorporate ... Even the best AF is not up to satisfactory in every situation.

Especially as the sensors of the AF101/GH1/2 significantly larger than the standard of 1 / 3 or 2 / 3 "cameras are there and the AF is not really made it easier ... .

But if you even vary between GH2 and an AF101 - you should again consider carefully what is important:) For the handling difference between the two already abundantly clear ...

Space


Antwort von coreoperation:

Thanks for the reply. If the situation allows it, of course, I work synonymous with the manual focus. But that's not always about.

As for the handling, I am now well incorporated into the GH1 (with separate audio device, etc.). However, I would naturally prefer to grab a camera such as the AF101 if they give me this for news and documentary-rotation key advantages. Sony EX1 and EX3 cams are of course synonymous interesting ...

In short, I just search a cam that has a strong auto focus and still leaves room for creative focus areas and manual controls.

If that was not there, I still continue to wait ...

Space


Antwort von soan:

"Core operation" wrote:

If that was not there, I still continue to wait ...


... or work finally start times manual. There is no situation in which an AF is superior to manual-focus. If you are unsure a quick glance at the distance scale of Optics, a little talent and some experience.

In other words, I do not know a good camera man, with the AF spins. All the neat turn manual focus only.

Space


Antwort von pilskopf:

With the GH2 one has indeed a very good push with the AF 14-140mm. I find a great fragrance. However, find ichs now synonymous with not so hard to draw the Pancake the Focus, I have the already not so bad on it and still can not really practice a lot, makes enormous fun and above all we know for sure what the focused one, I leave me but not to AF, for God's will. One just needs to use the viewfinder for it because it is much sharper than the screen. Is above all synonymous everything out of hand because the cam is so easy to clean great. 'd Better go with Rig, no question. In AF101 it would indeed be green in the same only better. What bothers me is when GH2 is still the strip fixed at ISO 3200, oh it must be the absolute Pana.

Space



Space


Antwort von coreoperation:

What interests me is still the auto focus. Who will give me something useful here can say the I am very grateful.

Space



Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen //


Panasonic AG-AF101 experience autofocus. For news and reportage for?




slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash