Infoseite // Panasonic AG-HPX500 First Look



Newsmeldung von slashCAM:


Panasonic AG-HPX500 First Look of thomas - 16 May 2007 18:11:00
First impressions and experiences with a prototype of the new P2 HD Cam of AG-HPX500 Panasonic. The tester of dvxuser that the HPX500 everything the HVX200, only more and better (longer recording times with 4 instead of 2 P2 slots, and a wider dynamic range, higher resolution, 2 / 3 instead of 1 / 3 inch CCD and therefore a higher sensitivity to light, more I / O such as HD-SDI, a better Tele, more audio inputs and a greater flexibility of the interchangeable lens.

This is an auto-generated entry



Space


Antwort von Michael Pilipp:

Heul !!!!!!!!! And more depth blur thanks 2 / 3!

Space


Antwort von Bernd E.:

And then this seems synonymous still very good focus-assistant ... Really a very interesting time for the Camera and the only reason, perhaps sometime but still with P2 cards, either.

Gruß Bernd E.

Space


Antwort von SToe:

Well, so much, the 2 / 3 again now synonymous not with the depth of field. Is certainly better than 1 / 3, but you take the HVX200 + 35 mm adapter and already one has the look much better with less investment.
The cam is great, but it is synonymous quite expensive and I personally do not like shoulder camera - to globig, Docus problematic for travel in the plane and too expensive. But it certainly depends on what you use the Cam.

Space


Antwort von Schleichmichel:

Quote: Well, so much, the 2 / 3 again now synonymous not with the depth of field.

But loose enough das Hey, I think that the issue of depth of field is really sometimes overstated.

Space


Antwort von HeikoS:

2 / 3 "is located almost at 16mm level in relation to the depth of field.

Space


Antwort von Woschsnasplater:

hi guys.

to your depth blur Battle:
2 / 3 "have a greater uncertainty than 16mm.
At least arithmetically.
If you turn on 16mm, you're only an advantage if you shoot with HS optics. Which the DOF is still synonymous know of the aperture depends! Focal anyway.
No clue what it s.der optik HPX500 uses, but depth blur Technically it is with the Panasonic camcorders have the advantage.

the price:
some are of the opinion, HVX200 + P & S are cheaper?
Just reckon!
You are more expensive for the rotation! believe me.

Which route you post the material handled turned HPX500 is a different story.

My decision, the PANASONIC is good.

Space


Antwort von JMitch:

a question with a s.alle the hd schultercam work:
how difficult is to manually adjust the focus
with these cams and the great resolution?
in detail reingezoomten gehts provides simple but
panorama bild Sharpen should already be severe.
gruß cj

Space


Antwort von Bernd E.:

"Anonymous" wrote: reingezoomten go in detail but simply provides a panoramic picture Sharpen should already be severe.
So do you usually the same as synonymous with other cameras: zoom, Sharpen, zurückzoomen and select the desired image.

Gruß Bernd E.

Space



Space


Antwort von zwiebel_sondermann:

"Woschsnasplater" wrote:

the price:
some are of the opinion, HVX200 + P & S are cheaper?
Just reckon!
You are more expensive for the rotation! believe me.


Who is talking because of P & S? As yet, there's now so many alternatives, some even less light to swallow than the P + S adapter at a fraction of the price. Most of the vendors have already or will soon be an add on, with which the Picture will be rotated in the adapter - that would be my view at the moment besides the excellent quality the only reason for the P + P. We must stop synonymous ask whether the reduced depth of focus really needs everywhere: travel reports, for example, can I find a great depth of field desired, while music videos or film projects would rather the other way.

Space


Antwort von woschsnasplater:

the price:
some are of the opinion, HVX200 + P & S are cheaper?

my HVX200 + P & S, cost list, 300, - plus optics, very fast 500, - euro s.Tag. There's the man with a big jump HPX500 cheaper. But of course synonymous higher tiefenschärfe. I know of no alternative to P & S, except this Movietube (well). Have s.set like quality. my homemade pappadapter can not really imagine. But if it works, I like better taught.

Space


Antwort von Michael aus Berlin:

Where can I HPX500 test in Berlin? Anybody know any good rental?

Space


Antwort von Herr Lehmann:

Super is the team of 25p * cine support GmbH! They have the HPX500, the new P + S Adapter for the HVX200 and Comparison to the Movietube! The company is centrally located in Berlin Prenzlauer Berg: Winsstrasse 51st There is the possibility of synonymous the material in the editing studio in HD quality viewing.

Space


Antwort von Daffy Duck:

I better find Nexfilm! Also aufm Prenzlberg, but clearly the more competent and pleasant staff!

Space


Antwort von desmosom:

s.P + S - competitive:


Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash