Frage von Liegerad-Andreas:
Hello,
The GS180 except the S-Video - Out and "Fade to white 'advantages over the successor GS230?
How good is the stabilizer?
The GS320 seems to me at any rate is not necessarily better than the GS230 to be better and the optics are better stabilizer discontinuation of microphone input and headphone output opposite.
Greeting
Andreas
http://www.liegerad-fernweh.de
Antwort von Rene K:
you have to ask you just answered yourself already ...
Antwort von oncestyle:
Hello Rene,
you have to ask you just answered yourself already ... That is, other differences do not exist? Then I can buy calms the GS230, which costs slightly less.
The stabilizer in this camera seems not to be hit, you can say so?
Greeting
Andreas
http://www.liegerad-fernweh.de
Antwort von Jan:
Hello, unfortunately, not quite, there are many small items.
GS GS 180 vs. 230, there's nothing more important, synonymous to the other allegedly stabilizer of Pana.de is still the EIS.
If one video asset trust may, I do now, the new 230er a new weakness, loss of sharpness at higher focal lengths, that is a cause for eigenltich available hard & expensive GS 180 to go.
GS 320 has much more to offer, I once again count on (though already made 8x)
- Leica Optics
- Optical stability
- 16 / 9 mode, with stabilizer
- S video cable included
- More Menusprachen with Turkish and Czech (glaub ich wars)
- Photos with 1 million in video mode
- Wireframe mode
etc.
Why the GS 180 & 230 a headphone output and microphone input and have the höherklassige 320 not only Panasonic knows.
If the last two things are not so important for you are, I would advise to 320, with Panasonic you can see a rather large difference of the models with the optical or digital stabilizing work. It does not matter now whether at 16 / 9 s.oder off.
Through the movements on the sensor of the digital image stabilizer gibts simply losses (sharpness, artifacts, etc)
VG
Jan
Antwort von oncestyle:
Hi Jan,
thanks for the reply, if they are synonymous, I do not really easier to make: - \
The stabilizer is a better argument that the Optics perhaps synonymous, and the remainder for uninteresting.
Only with the Microphone input is stupid, because as I understand it, is mandatory if you do not drive noises recorded. Panasonic Or is it not so bad? About Canon is probably as much gemeckert.
Greeting
Andreas
http://www.liegerad-fernweh.de
Antwort von Rene K:
micro input and to control the headphone output should they already have. one day you are standing in the situation, an external micro connect to have a good sound to it, or him as an o-ton to get somewhere.
forming the stable, I never miss. movies with tripod, if possible, or with small lenses and then with both hands beautifully quiet. s.besten with severe stativ platte turn. ne is the exercise to ask, but you get synonymous beautiful pictures, and more importantly, a good sound when it is of hardships.
Antwort von videostar:
Hello Rene,
forming the stable, I never miss. movies with tripod, if possible, or with small lenses and then with both hands beautifully quiet. Yes, Tripod, anyway, I'm not a youth channel, where the cameraman extra wobbles ...
But the camera is synonymous s.fahrenden cycling (road) are used, as would a stabilizer probably not unimportant.
Greeting
Andreas
Antwort von Jan:
Current Sonyand Panasonic cameras tend to drive less, Zoom & Handle noises, only faint inaudible passages. Many current S & P models have a self noise & sounds good to very good note, yes, the Canon to have any problem with that - fair or sufficient, then permits the magazines. But if you belong to the people, often in the silent film atmosphere, then a microphone port duty.
I need a headphone output and microphone input, but I have enough synonymous ordinary customers in the store that never has an external Microphone or Headphones join. This is synonymous to the reason for the Panasonic Wegrationalisierung of claimants, there are certainly a good 90% to belong to normal petrol.
VG
Jan
