Frage von Hobbyknipser:
Hello!
I'm new here and wanted to post my first experience with this device and ask a question ...
I have the device now 3 days and am actually very excited about the quality of the recording and processing.
Somewhat disappointed, I was a recording of the evening in the hallway. While watching television on my already rustled quite what I had not expected it. The lighting of the hall, I can appreciate bad. Grand entrance with "conventional" light sources. Setting AI.
Then I tried the long shutter times synonymous and other possibilities.
Good weather camera?
Actually, I wanted to keep the cam like ....
Can I velleicht Principal sponsors with certain settings?
What can you recommend?
I had actually bought, so that at times synonymous with celebrations subdued light riff clever shots. On my Aiptek H5 is outdoors during the day the world in order. But you get indoors will often look at the "eye cancer.
If I am the TM 350 does not get now, I am disappointed schwehr genuine. For, in fine weather, the image difference between the two cams no> $ 1000 is worth ..
EDIT: 25.09.2009
Yesterday I once made a direct Comparison between the Panasonic and Aiptek of the living room. Maybe I'm just too demanding. The test showed that the cameras can not be compared with each other. Even without the laboratory we see the stark difference. Plants and colors are displayed in low light, yet tired and sharp (; Panasonic). The Aiptek was (when the light conditions, dusk begins in the living room without artificial light already) almost entirely on the mind. The picture simply looked just horrible. The whole range of strong noise on the horizontal stripes in the picture, etc. ..
After that I went for a walk even a little bit and had casually filmed. As I have looked at the material, I was again very satisfied. The new "Active OIS" feature inspired me. With a little practice, it need not Steadycam. Hammer.
Regards
Antwort von ChrischMan:
Hello,
pity, with the low-light characteristics so it sounds not so good.
I had hoped with the 350 to an alternative in the area for the SonyXR5x0.
Greeting
ChrischMan
Antwort von opel:
Hello,
Panasonic is not quite in lowlight front, but otherwise very good.
Here at Slashcam you find in the tests secure evidence of the lowlight factor that is synonymous s.den at the relatively small lenses in the consumer sector always looming.
More light makes sure what, but this must then be set to manual white balance, what with the 350 is indeed possible.
Pana is already a bit of a Schöwetter-camera, especially in the consumer sector.
This experience, I had to make fairly synonymous.
Antwort von Jogi:
Slashcam camcorder offers an unrivaled database with their help one can give a first impression of a camera. The 12 lux pictures are strengths or weaknesses in lowlight quickly identify. So, prior information can save you a lot of disappointment!
