Frage von Fairy:
Times I would be interested in how the quality of the above model. Comparison to a standard device such as the Canon MV690. Is there someone next to me help?
Thanks and greetings.
Antwort von StefanS:
Panasonic M10?
If I really had in mind, we are talking here of 20 years old world craftsmanship. And if this is so and if you like that of a current Canon MV690 MiniDV Camera, is in between worlds in some way between a moped and a Goldwing, or between a VW and a bucket Hummer H1 or between a horse and cart and an Australian Road Train or or or
Depending on the discipline.
The most decisive, however, is:
Did you once with a VHS "cut", ie copied? Already the first-generation copy had only vermatschte surfaces. The second-generation copy was almost no longer visible. That was the reason for me, the thing straight back into the corner to throw. Misjudgment of 3000 was honored DM
MiniDV is cut with, as long as no "transition" and "effects" that are pure copy of zeros and ones. That is, as long as you stay in DV, you can copy as long as you want, the quality of the image does not suffer as Zero Zero One remains and will remain one.
With initial insertion of transitions and effects, the quality starts to suffer. There are different statements at different codecs if you are in the so-called 5th or 10th generation rendering a distinction can be seen.
A further loss of quality then you have in the DVD compilation, because once unpacked again and much more compressed. However, this loss can be minimized to the extent that he hardly noticed. DV material, cut, and rendered with transitions which, to DVD compression are still thousand times better than an original VHS recording.
Greeting
Stefan
Antwort von Fairy:
Thank you for the detailed answer. Do me next helped.
