Frage von Sputnik41182:
Hello I got together recently, the Panasonic NV GS increased 500th Wanted to ask if anyone knows where I can find a test or something, or perhaps even someone of you experience with the Cam? First impression is very good of picture quality, I am very pleasantly surprised. DV cams that I previously knew you could not just in terms of image quality FRIEND. The Tonaufname was during a brief test synonymous not bad. Has anyone of you here may have other opinions, I'd look your opinions about the gs-500 hearing
Stefan
Antwort von vergessen log in dvwga:
Hello!
I've recently increased the synonymous Cam and am very excited about it. Had time for a while, the SonyVX2100, s.diese is the 500 of course not on it, but nevertheless, the Resolutionwirklich well, stop by the sharpness of synonymous and synonymous to handle I think succeeded. In terms of the action s.dem price compared to more than double the cost of the above sony you get offered good.
Antwort von dietl:
I agree. Equipment-All Top And as for the picture, I'm not a hundred percent sure because I have committed no außenlichtmaterial via firewire, but it nalles seen so far, very good.
Also, I am satisfied.
Antwort von Sputnik41182:
Thanks for your impressions, synonymous think the 500 was not a bad purchase.
Antwort von Ela-Luca:
Hello,
because it says good things about the
NV-GS 500, I would like to ask again, as their Erfarhung have it.
Came across just today on this camera, looking for a few weeks after a perfect camera for me (for short films in Unibereich) to about 900EUR.
I, for one slightly irritated that there is no headphone jack. Why is seldom synonymous with "moderate expensive" cameras like these?
In settling the
shutter speed manual? Find only the numbers "1 / 50 to 1 / 8000", but no further notice.
Is important to me especially that I can push the
edge and have some game.
ND filter is not listed? Also no indication in the Panasonic brochure :-(.
(White Balance is of course synonymous manual, right?)
What General: I have never "just worked" with the SonyDSR-PD170P. To what extent do these really expensive cameras of the NV-GS 500? Image quality, zoom range ...? So what we must become even taken?
Then again, thanks already for each answer. I'm really glad that there are such forums and the people to :-).
Regards
Jennifer
Antwort von oliver II:
Hi Jennifer!
Shutter speed manual: yes
Aperture manual: yes
Focus (sharpness) manual: yes
Manual white balance: yes
ND filter: No
This and everything else under the user guide:
http://produkte.panasonic.de/doc/a0106/nv-gs500eg-s/userguide/nv-gs500eg-s_userguide_1_d_-.pdf
Greeting
Oliver
Antwort von Ela-Luca:
Man, many, many thanks for the quick reply.
I'm pretty s.Rumrödeln - already dreaming of cameras:-o. But imagine that I am slowly but surely increasing the NV GS ... apprehend the eye. In the 180s, the lens does not seem to really s.The heranzukommen others - but have headphone ...!
That differ only in the 280s and 300s
DV input, I think entscheidungserschwerend :-( genuine. Nen input for $ 100!
But I would like to save even videos on tape. And the 500s would be nice, but pretty much synonymous even more expensive.
I look now for the first time in the operating instructions. Thank you!
When you've decided on the 500, what you stood for choice, while you decide then and why?
Regards
Jennifer
Antwort von oliver II:
Hi Jennifer!
I have no GS 500 but only for you a little rummaging on the Internet. :-) I films with a Canon XL2 and am very happy with it.
The DV input you should necessarily take as synonymous still the backup to DV tape, the safest way is. I have a few (a few synonymous enn) DVD had reported failures and was very glad that I have my laboriously cut film or on tape.
Perhaps that will change the durability of DVDs so soon, but now it's still too unsafe.
Greeting
Oliver
Antwort von BlackPyre:
Hello Jennifer,
I ordered 2 weeks before the GS-300 and must say it really makes pico pictures -> day! But when it is not very bright as day (inside of rooms) is now fully open the aperture and depending on even less light, you have that means synonymous nor a 12-18dB gain on the chip -> the krieseln fill in the picture.
I returned the camera back and I'll order the GS-500th In the lens size is true just as on a motorbike ->
Displacement is replaced by anything except by yet more displacement I think the higher price you will soon appreciate, given the larger picture "tube" is simply a better light-harvesting and thereby produce higher quality results :-))
LG,
Chris :-)
Antwort von steveb:
in all things you shall purchase the life and would like to buy or use, there is always the question: What requirements do I s.das device? And as my subjective value concept is and how I rate the buying criteria?
Nunmal Everyone does it differently. For the one is a "little benefit" have final decision to buy, another smile about ....
So you should always try to customize his ideas of eg a camcorder-purchase and if possible to "identify the factual criteria '. Furthermore, one should consider statements of others and try to always relative whose statements with their own ideas,
to compare. Where necessary, of course, synonymous to the use of other owners, with the 'own motivations. "
Pauschalaussagen others may support your decision, but may not always be decisive.
So it is always necessary, a detailed "procurement and deliver Nutzenrecherche" ahead of the actual purchase.
Antwort von Nightfly!:
Moin moin!
I agree with steveb aside the opposition of "factual" vs.. 'individual'.
... So you should always try to customize his ideas of eg a camcorder-purchase and if possible to "identify the factual criteria '. .... Subjective / Individual assessments can also show you only one direction for you shall not be considered absolute truth.
Ie s.end is definitely taking the test himself / in his hand.
Gruß,
Nightfly!
Antwort von jabone:
Oh by the way: camcorderinfo.com has finally published the review on GS 500th
Asl shadow of the GS 400, it of course, is a bit pathetic, synonymous if the video quality is even improved (and much better than GS 250/300).
Look for themselves (without having to GS 400), but the GS 500 is a great camcorder.
Antwort von Loox:
It's not all that simple, although it is true that you should consider in advance and must be exactly what you want to use the camcorder.
If he mainly uses for example, outdoor scenes, is the difference from the GS300 to the GS500 very marginal.
I have the GS300 synonymous synonymous carefully examined in advance whether to bring the 3CCD chips, which are not the greatest, less synonymous with good light conditions good results:
In the photo retailer I trust I have made with the SonyHC96E shots and then the same shots with the GS300. Conclusion: The GS300 has delivered significantly better results, clear kontratreich hardly Vignetierung Griesel and no ....
Conclusion: In any case 3CCD technology. Whether it be the GS500, I believe, rather less, because all the test better than the GS300 Rate Cam, synonymous, and just in terms of image quality. These test are indeed always synonymous with enjoying a degree of caution, but it would not be identified in an incorruptible and measurement laboratories with the subjective eye of the beholder.
Have fun ....
Antwort von jabone:
Whether it be the GS500, I believe, rather less, because all the test better than the GS300 Rate Cam, synonymous, and just in terms of image quality. That's not true really, Loox, and that has nothing to do with it, I've dei cam, but only rated 300 Gs Videoaktiv the better, otherwise look the other way, all exactly as it is true indeed synonymous.
Why would the G's should have better image quality than the 300 Gs 500?
Moreover, it is Videoaktiv but rather on the high level of noise (which is total nonsense acuh yes-19%, which I do not laugh)
Antwort von Loox:
No. Jabon, it's not just about the noise, it is synonymous around the shutter response time much worse.
What is wrong or that einmanl was undecided, the fact is that determined Videoaktib say this evaluation on Metrology Basics and these are, we once incorruptible.
Well, it's like always in life, to be the supposedly more expensive model has by no means the better. Whether one wants to admit it or not.
But we all have the * best * camcorder - or not :-))
This reminds me somehow very s.The discussions in the DSLR forum, where it comes to digital SLR cameras, my real passion. There, too, teursten models are by no means always the best, and yet it glaut each lachmichweg * *
Have a nice afternoon.
Antwort von prem:
Hello ...
have only now discovered the threat. Synonymous already had a few days before another packed ( "Which Camera is right?"). As I drew synonymous nor other cameras in observing, I want to buy myself a camcorder for the foreseeable future synonymous. Now I'm just here to clarify my last question and wills Simply reinschreiben here again, especially here 2 user have the GS500 (for the posts). So ...
Is it worth the financial overhead of 100 ¬ of the GS250 to the GS500, the GS250 has since exhibited apparently strong vignetting. If this problem has been corrected in the GS500?
Antwort von Preludegreen:
Hi folks,
have been 2-3 weeks, the GS500 and am quite satisfied so far. I angetestet times out of pure curiosity Nightshotfunktion and noted that it is simply unusable. The picture was very choppy and I honestly do not know why this is even an option.
Really annoys me only that you can not turn off the funny noise when you shoot. Do not even noticed that EVERY one has just made a Stillimage, right? May be synonymous, but I simply am bissi s blind and have the appropriate menu item not found how to turn off the stupid noise.
For me it is really only the image quality and image stabilization, the more important that I get out of the car movies. Although'm quite a decent keeper but there are always vibrations! In the area where I am anyway filme ...
Greeting
Antwort von Markus:
[nightshotfunktion] ... I honestly do not know why this is even an option. The answer this:
Questions about the night mode of the NV-GS180
Antwort von Preludegreen:
Ahh ok ... have understood! ;-) More than that, it is not eh!
