Frage von bjelgorod:
Hello, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I am looking for some time after the perfect camera for a two-month long trek in the Pyrenees. Meanwhile, I tend to GH2. The camera is mainly used for filming, but a couple of photos I will of course make synonymous. I would take Gewichtsgruenden from the smaller 14-42mm kit Objectively want. Now I've read that the 14-45mm Objectively should be handled better. I would like to know if the difference is really that great for the film? Important to me would be definitely a good OIS, since much of the hand will be filmed .. Are the differences rel. The Lenses OISEigenschaften the two very large? And what about with volume down from? Is the film OIShoerbar when? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Thank you for
Antwort von Axel:
There are yet alone of Panasonic 3 or 4 different MFTs 14-42. Image stabilization on trust, I would not be alone. The good news: The GH2 is easy to stabilize. This was posted here a lot. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I recommend that you make in advance, especially familiar with the Camera. It makes good pictures, but has a number of flaws - which was also written about in great profusion - about which you should be aware of before taking action.
Antwort von bjelgorod:
Hi Axel, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e thanks for the info, it was not aware with the variety of lenses. Can you say something to the 14-42mm kit Objectively? I'm still eineCanon550D, but I think here the film from the hand without OIS somewhat difficult. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Thank you
Antwort von rush:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von cantsin:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Filmo:
The of "rush" is mentioned new Panasonic lenses are divided, lost time to say kindly: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e (Something blaettern forward in the thread) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e the 14-45mm, however, is generally good repute.
Antwort von rush:
\u003cdiv class=\
