Newsmeldung von slashCAM:\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von Wintermorgen:
The Cropfaktoren not to forget, making it virtually impossible to take in lower Liquiditations. I understand the often mentioned is far too little. At least for me it was the reason that I decided against the Scarlet. \u003cbr /\u003e See you again on this. \u003cspan style=\
Antwort von WoWu:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von coyut:
Crop Intsabilitaet, support, data handling, high power consumption, extreme Lego design where everything only once be to tinkered need (eg XLR), weaker light output in Comparison to other cams, weight and Availability The parts had to decide reasons for me against a Scarlet. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e For the use of 4K is the Scarlet certainly not bad. But for my needs I am for a much more carefree decided c300. 4K, the next two years is definitely still be with me noKillerkriterium. And by 2014 it will probably be a whole flood a.neuen 4K + cams. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I would turn for the bigscreen, I would certainly reconsider the issue again, but probably more synonymous with Alexa send the Epic and the race: o) But for a "favorable" 4K 3D setup is the Scarlet certainly synonymous noschlechte choice.
Antwort von WoWu:
It must be not only bigscreen. \u003cbr /\u003e (If so, the 4K resolution we mean.) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e It is enough exposure as synonymous for 2K film in 2 twisted and with a 1.85 frame Datacine Spirit 2K scanned with results only for the 1714 Academy frame size (1920 for perf perf to). \u003cbr /\u003e Subsequently, it corresponds to 1820 up gescaled what the Cineon image width (2048 of perforation to perforation, including the soundtrack) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e However, if you in front of a 4K, there will be a visual downscaling, which not only directly generate the correct format but converts synonymous 2K image resolution in the higher sharpness. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e So it's been not quite so awkward, so long as it works all over for cinema, not neglecting to 4K so completely (even for 2K). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Provided with "bigscreen" Cinema is generally meant is certainly not an issue at 4K.
Antwort von iasi:
RAW! \u003cbr /\u003e who provides?
Antwort von WoWu:
Yes, yes, there is already something in that ...
Antwort von Valentino:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von WoWu:
That was probably expressed only unhappy. But do realize what he mine. \u003cbr /\u003e It was synonymous, as I have understood the reference to ProRes, but that there is just no RAW.
Antwort von Valentino:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von WoWu:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Valentino:
Was directed so indirectly a.dich. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Did the test synonymous briefly flew over, but as I said, is sweeping the 4k image but just like the 5k image. \u003cbr /\u003e For still images of 5k EPIC / Scarlet all over this one should recognize garkeine or differences? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e 've Had so easily passed the suspicion that his Scarlet simply no real Blackshading. \u003cbr /\u003e Need to get in because the R1 synonymous always two or three No. of cycles of a clever noise.
Antwort von WoWu:
error:
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
Has anyone seen a link on RED RAW originals? \u003cbr /\u003e Thank you \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I used to face the woman, the JPEG 4K to 2K then scaled back to 4K. \u003cbr /\u003e Comparison with the original ;-) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e This brings 4K nothing, even the smallest capillaries with white eyes looks the same. \u003cbr /\u003e (5cm Tiefenschaerfe is no HD for me.) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft
Antwort von coyut:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von iasi:
If I understand you correctly, you say: \u003cbr /\u003e it rushes not stronger in the crop-forest \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e where does it actually gemaekel of the likes of Bloom and Co.? \u003cbr /\u003e what really believe that to see or recognize? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e another question: low-light. \u003cbr /\u003e how, then, is actually the default sensitivity of the sensor? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e when "2011-camera-shoot-out" was the red one for x \u003cbr /\u003e 5000EI for signal / noise = 10 determined. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e at INDEX800 (film gama) by the way they came to -7 to +5 stops for the red one mx \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e to the "old" red one time there was an informative and useful article-in movie and TV cameraman.
Antwort von wenzel chris:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von iasi:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von wenzel chris:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von iasi:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von coyut:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von handiro:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von WoWu:
Strictly speaking, this means, but the downward curve is different. In any case, the noise levels are all relative to 23 degrees C and Heat plays an essential role. \u003cbr /\u003e Even for people who like to work with ND and remove only the visible light range here ... In the IR range, the Objectively then acts in strong sunlight like a magnifying glass.
