Frage von Tuvok:
http://www.geizhals.at/a192841.html
vs.
http://www.geizhals.at/a179756.html
gibts in the Media and Saturn
where I do not know what is with the
http://www.geizhals.at/a181330.html
Pioneer, I can change every single color, all on points
With the Panasonic, I can only via bar 3 to 4 x the color change, but not the individual colors
but not the brightness in 3 steps as in the Pioneer
Panasonic has 10,000:1
Pioneer 3.000:1
is on an HD or similar HD Picture, this is not quite HD, I was told by a salesperson, the Picture of Panasconic dark at dark, but it can be seen in the Pioneer more detail in the dark
Panasonic is not as pretty as Pioneer and has 3 cm less Picture diagonal
Sound is the same
Pioneer has more display options than Panasonic
but less, as specified
Nevertheless, the Picture of Pio is better than the Pana
why?
Technically, what is the difference?
Panasonic - 2399 ¬
Pioneer - 3199 ¬
When analogue TV is the Panasonic darker, but with the settings as seen from the Pioneer and the colors can then be synonymous set so that they are sharp and warm.
Antwort von mkrawietz:
The first question you answer yourself with your second question.
The answer to the second question are the components used and their Funktinalität. What exactly will tell you only the cutting or metrological analysis.
BUT! Is it important to know why is it better? You're a product or copy machine?
;-)
Nightfly!
Antwort von Tuvok:
it's just interesting
The price difference must indeed be a 106 reasons why he Bang and Olufsen 8000 costs, a he 106 Panasonic 2,500, and a Pioneer 3200 with 109 cm
Although the Pio the values are worse than the ds Picture sharpened Pana
Antwort von AndyZZ:
it's just interesting
The price difference must indeed be a 106 reasons why he Bang and Olufsen 8000 costs, By the 8000 Euro 3000 Euro for the "bang" and there are around 3,000 euros for the "Olufsen. The "&" in between you get for $ 10. The remaining $ 1,990 will probably stuck somewhere in the technology and design.
Antwort von Axel:
Salut Tuvok
Sound is the same With all due respect, I do not believe me. The differences just at this point is huge.
Nevertheless, the Picture of Pio is better than the Pana
why? Since you want to have, above all, good picture and good sound, you need test results and technical statistics do not take care of. As with many aspects of this industry, such judgments are often subjective, and the measured values without significance
*. I suggest that in addition to a Comparison with (same) HD demo material (Premiere World Cup would have been just fine), all considered eligible TVs and while all values are 50%, are also neutral (synonymous then you are the same, whether the Remote control is good). Next I would take a self-made SD-DVD, which you know by heart in Picture and Sound - for you are the best reference out there.
According to this test procedure is often divorced from initial favorites. My opinion is: It should now be no more plasma, the maximum dynamic range says nothing about the
appearance of a high-contrast image, just as the number of speakers or their performance on the
sound (high-end speaker in the creaking plastic plug housing, many Thanks), for me it is a LG made. With minimal weaker picture than the Pana (but better than Pio, and Sam's about the same with less Sony), but for better sound and about 1,000 mosquitoes. You see, everything is subjective.
* If you're in the catalog to provide a UNIVERSL Panseatic or surround receiver with a Pioneer compare the dealer, it surprises you, perhaps, that the lower costs bring 800W models, the Pioneer, but only 120W. The solution: 800W, the
power ;-)
Antwort von Tuvok:
of the values I verglic
Pana - the new
Pioneer 436 XDE
B / O - Beovision 7 / 40
Silva
And so the B / O has the best technology, according Picture
Pio - the best times
Although Pana has the better values
At B / O so much lies inside
1 remote control to control everything
The anti-reflective glass s.Plasma eg costs ¬ 1,100
the panel to ¬ 3,000 if it is ordered each
At B / O is still the Ansteuerungspult or so to the entire 15,000 ha Parts
So much technology is already there to vile money inside.
Antwort von Axel:
Anti-reflective glass s.Plasma eg costs ¬ 1,100 Wow! That buys some like a camera or two. I am not so rich to me last
Tupplur.
