Frage von estragon:
Hello,
I have video recordings made in offices.
The resulting sound (dialogue 2er people)
is very reverberant.
Is it because something better?
I work with Adobe products (PP, Soundboth etc.)
thank you in advance
Gruß, Bernd
Antwort von Meggs:
The sound is not with the built-Micro record, but with an external Micro, which is as close to the spokespeople there.
Antwort von KrischanDO:
If the camera does not connect to an external Micro has s.zu Ebay so ... ;-)
If this does not work, maybe ¬ 200 a Zoom H2 recorder stuck and, always important, close s.den spokesman bring.
Separately record, then drunterlegen.
Regards
Christian
Antwort von estragon:
Maybe I was so ambiguous words
The images are already created ...
And an external micro, I have used. And not a bad ...
The FAGE is more in the direction:
Is there still something to salvage?
Gruß Bernd
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Gude
regular times to the sound-10dB down.
Right click on the clip - Audio amplification - "-10dB"
Then the sound should come clean - makes you almost always so.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Meggs:
Maybe I was so ambiguous words
The images are already created ...
And an external micro, I have used. And not a bad ...
For next time: Microfinance as close as possible to the sound source is the A & O.
The FAGE is more in the direction:
Is there still something to salvage? The Space Hall shares barely get you out. You could try 1 post in which nothing is spoken as to highlight and to filter out noise. Whether that sounds acceptable, you must try.
Antwort von thos-berlin:
That will not work. The Hall is not a fault in the sense of a more or less constant noise (eg fan).
Yes Besatndteile Hall contains the actual Nutztons and is therefore no more constant background noise.
In
Antwort von KrischanDO:
Hi,
Despite reading the "Practical Book: Sound is still a lot to me as unclear.
If I were with the EX-1 or the Zoom H2 record, I try to -10 auszusteuern, which means that only rare tips go to 0 dB.
In Premiere Pro CS3 then the volume is rather low.
Right click on the audio clip and "Normalize" usually brings an increase of 10 to 15 dB.
The sound quality is for me (46 years, mild tinnitus) in the Sennheiser HD 25C is not so bad before, but I bellicose a volume in the game I have to fade with between O-Sound and comment on the switch.
What does "normalization."
Audacity is indeed synonymous.
Or do I need when recording higher levels?
Regards
Christian
PS: If something starts in the ear to whistle, hiss, ring, whatever - do not wait until 6 weeks, if it is synonymous erstmal not seriously disturbed. IMMEDIATELY to the ENT doctor. Not with infusions and Reizstrom abspeisen, but after "Stellatum blockade" ask. If the ENT Doc does not know, doctor switch.
Antwort von thos-berlin:
It should be in digital equipment disqualify a bit more cautious, as there is no "headroom", a reserve above the actual Maximalaussteuerung 0 db there. To perform clipping immediately disorders. It is the level mercilessly truncated.
When normalizing the volume is then raised so that the loudest part in (or just below) the Maximalaussteuerung is 0 db.
Antwort von KrischanDO:
When normalizing the volume is then raised so that the loudest part in (or just below) the Maximalaussteuerung is 0 db. So rather cautious and disqualify behind Raise?
It reads as is "normalizing" a useful function because not equalized, but all about the same amount will be raised to the peak at zero.
Correctly?
Thanks and greetings
Christian
Antwort von tommyb:
The loudest place in the audio track will be taken as a reference and it will do everything raised to this same place exactly loudest 0dB achieved.
This may be useful for example if the sound from an external file is delivered to a different level cap has. Then you can normalize the fast and the sound can be raised so that he technically can not clip. Trying times of the hand - then you need the whole timeline to play to make sure that everything is correct.
The normalization makes very useful, however, works only with the already gepegelt recording or, for example through a limiter restricted. That is, if you with an external mixer and the work gives you a level up to-9dB (for headroom), then someone coughs and this goes back to high-3dB and contact you later "normalize" to, then the remaining sound by up to 3dB raised, but the cough is exactly at 0dB.
Antwort von Schlafsack:
Hello tarragon,
anticipated shortly, your audio program, I know not.
If my voice recordings "reverberant" sound, I go with a parametric equalizer ran. That will not happen when recording in the church, etc. - Because you've lost. If it is normal spaces that are mostly annoying "Booming" frequencies, which represent the Hall.
Then I play the file s.and turn s.dem Equi, s.dem a narrow goodness I've set and the gain was very regulated, and hear good speakers (monitors interception), in which the frequency "booming" is extreme. Then I, this is exactly the frequency and they are also narrow valley from. There are often several frequencies, especially the echo, then you have to be synonymous often repeated. Of course everything is a feeling thing, because one must not exaggerate synonymous, so there is no "thin" sound.
Sometimes's Miracle, an attempt is worth it. Good luck!
Antwort von KSProduction:
Maybe I was so ambiguous words
The images are already created ...
And an external micro, I have used. And not a bad ...
The FAGE is more in the direction:
Is there still something to salvage?
Gruß Bernd if your program in the audio processing has a compressor in it because you could try something. a compressor is more here to level fluctuations. But in the hall because of the ton raumakkustik could be linked synonymous with a spongy response and it could be that you are with the compressor can mend anything. check whether you are synonymous with the height slightly reduce it. because nobody here receptive to your ear and gets the exact extent is not really assess is, is it easy to try out on synonymous.
