Frage von Kinderbutt:
If you think your sound to prefer external (not only external but Micro external recording device) or on tape with an external Micro recording?
Both would certainly have advantages and disadvantages. Thus the external recording probably completely free of any drive noise (even more reliable than with spider), however, must be sound in retrospect, then synchronize again.
Antwort von Markus73:
[...] It would completely external recording probably free of any drive noise (even more reliable than with spider), however, must be sound in retrospect, then synchronize again. What, however, no major problem, especially because of the synonymous camcorder's own sound is present, the one great advantage can be taken by the established external soundtrack accurately positioned. I have practiced several times (in my case, a sound recording directly to laptop) and had no problems with it.
Gruß,
Markus
Antwort von Kinderbutt:
As you surely right. For a film project so you can also use ne Synchrotech flap. However, I want to make extensive documentation. So I would like to know if / what benefits (apart from the nichtvorhandenen drive noise) brings an external recording.
Antwort von Axel:
As you surely right. For a film project so you can also use ne Synchrotech flap. However, I want to make extensive documentation. So I would like to know if / what benefits (apart from the nichtvorhandenen drive noise) brings an external recording. The main advantage is: A Tonmann. Even if the sound level of the dowry and the holding of the directional microphones are not particularly creative or difficult task seems to be. But it is difficult, field of view, exposure, sharpness
and Level to be monitored simultaneously. Nobody, even the totally inexperienced with external Micro and level control for the first time the automatic off, doubts that the sound has improved. But it goes
even better: With a Tonmann. Using a mixer and XLR
line in of the camera or recorded on an external recording device. If it is important to pay the overhead.
Antwort von Basti16:
Other advantages are:
Man is not s.die 2-channel 48KHz/16Bit the Camera bound not synonymous and s.die converter.
Man at large distances must not necessarily a radio link, or eternally long cable. One can, depending on the motive, the recording device in the vicinity of the sound source position.
Nurton-shots do not require unpacking the Camera.
Field recording is fun.
Antwort von Markus:
If you think your sound to prefer external [...] or on tape with an external Micro recording? Packages can not answer this question. For continuous recordings (eg Konzertmitschnitt), it is not next tragic if Picture and Sound in the Postpro synchronized. In short, individual scenes can be annoying and it is extremely time consuming, all individually need to align.
Antwort von BananaDragon:
The question was also of me. Was not logged.
Markus, it will tend to be shorter single shots. So would be related to your statement yes recordings directly onto DV tape rather offer.
