Frage von noboundaries:
Hello,
I have gained an extra cutting a dual core system. Adobe shows at startup "to multicore. Unfortunately, the surface is laggy as ever and ever, then the system utilization is 50% so that means that expects only 1 core. In particular, the export that is synonymous to watch.
How can I optimize it? Thought Premiere Pro multithreaded application is absolutely, for up to 4 cores and more!
Antwort von noboundaries:
I checked again in the System Manager. Under Premiere are always active between 35 and 40 threads. I use about 5-6 effects filters. Why the # # # # is used as only one processor core? If the effects are active and for example, I leave the preview run - he shows no picture because it does not work in real time - and then press Stop synonymous, then he still plays at least one minutes next until he grasped that he should stop!
This is truly a major disappointment
Antwort von sid7:
Yes
exactly! The problem I have synonymous. None know for as a solution?
Antwort von noboundaries:
Hello Sid7,
I found out the following:
with respect to the inertial preview can unfortunately do nothing s.besten for cutting off the first time all computationally intensive filters.
I was able to reduce the export to my Tesprojekt of 76h to 40h, and although by letting deinterlace the material. In the Timeline, right click on each clip, then Halbildoptionen, ever join. In addition, I export optimized in the intermediate format DivX 6.1.1 (dual-core, Highest settings, data rate) doubles in 8000, but I think that had nothing to do with it.
Antwort von Goohn:
Hello
Have the same problem and the preview also jerky and stutters so much that you can not audit panels, etc.. Has anyone a tip there? Incorrect settings, etc.?
I cut with Premiere Pro 2
The workstation, Fujitsu Siemens Celsius V. That should really be enough.
I'm thankful for every tip
Antwort von noboundaries:
The problem is that many filters in Adobe Premiere is not designed for dual core. And Premiere is apparently just as fast as the slowest filter.
I'm back away from it. I "washed clean" now my VHS material with Virtual Dub, export it to DV, cut it with Studio 10, with export lossless huffyuf and then convert again in DivX 6 with Virtual Dub to. Usually I leave it up to 4 instances of Virtual Dub run concurrently (with) tiered priority. The load is now constantly at 100%, and the effects are very powerful filter for VDub, I sometimes think even better than Premiere. Zb Deshaker 1.8 is just insane, which so far does not offer me a fee program.
My combination of filters:
Deinterlace
Deshaker 1.8
MSU Denoiser 1.6.2
MSU Smart Brightnes 1.0.1 () depending on the material
The output material is superb, and with Studio 10 is cutting it a breeze thanks to the automatic scene detection (the biggest weakness s.Premiere).
Antwort von Goohn:
Hello noboundaries
Yes, that is with certainty one way, but I have Premiere Pro, now synonymous times and wants to use it, after all, it is not exactly cheap. There must be something to make it! Is there any possibility? That's correct annoying at the price I actually assume that the software is in order. Should I seek help directly s.Adobe? Or can someone help me here?
Antwort von noboundaries:
No, there's no way. Perhaps the next version brings better dual core support. I would sell off the software on Ebay again, wenns is synonymous with loss. Hurt. For me, Adobe Premiere synonymous detection was a huge disappointment (bad dual core support, no scene - keep for your simple stupid hyperthreading Pentium 4 computer - tailor made). The hardware can not use the software features are not supported.
What do you can be here all the time to post the settings you use. Move Steady as with one stroke destroyed makes the dual-core advantage. Similarly, I believe it is with Auto Color, Auto Contrast and Auto Levels. MPEG2 export is synonymous poorly optimized, DV contrast with exports about 90% utilization. You'll never reach 100%, plus the software must be highly optimized. Or do you still buy After Effects, there is the Dual Core support supposedly much better.
Another way: If you have very much RAM, let's just run 2 instances in 2 various agencies user levels. Then export the projects, although each still with handbrake, but the fact that we have 2 at the same time you bring in the end by the same amount of material, such as when your dual-core would be 100% utilized.
Antwort von Goohn:
Uh-oh Uh-oh, this is very encouraging. If I had only known sooner ...
Thanks for the tips, I'm going to see what we can do.
Alternatively, I will heed your way anyway. Thank you.
Gruß Martin
Antwort von tobsen:
all sounds very tempting ... I had
Antwort von prem:
Hello tobsen
It says in the new magazine c't that their test computer with Multitrax went to his knees. Since I would be careful. That's all I can say.
Antwort von tobsen:
Hi,
Thanks for the info, will try the same time, to get the latest c't. Do you know whether that was with DV or HDV? With DV it were indeed nen indictment understand HDV somehow (only question is how many cams ...).
What you can cut any HDV (with more than a trace = Multicam / Multitrax)? Times now on this side of one
Antwort von Mr Jo:
Hi guys,
In return, I can not complain about bad DC support. I process large animated Digi-Pictures to HDV stuff and to use an AMD 64 X2 4600 + Prozzi. graphics card: GeForce 6600, 2 GB of RAM. The dual-core support is absolutely clearly visible, while the load is indeed given only when the calculator must be expected synonymous. The arrest is thus no significant load profile, however, is rendered a work area, then work both cores with an average occupancy of 75%, peaks of 87% can be observed. The same goes for export to AVI or MPEG, where the utilization of both cores varies between 40% and 95%.
The prerequisite for functioning is DualCor Support: Windows XP Professional or Win 2K - that this system must be installed on existing DualCor processor is the processor installed retrospectively in a single-core system, the system acts not as a multiprocessor PC. To verify the proper support in the device manager, then click on the device "computer" because standing MUST: ACPI Multiprocessor PC.
If the program interface of APP so small that you can place next to the Taskman, where it can be under "Performance" means the utilization of both cores observed during a Rechnvorganges. So render times just a not yet rendered the work area and observe the same time the task manager ..
In addition, the following are Programs (through the 100% DC support) for a general review of the CD capability of the computer: Acronis True Image, DVD Shrink, Windows Movie Maker. Just play a AVI in Movie Maker, converts to *. wmv, there MUST be both CPU graphs in task manager s.Anschlag ..
Greeting Mr Jo
Antwort von tobsen:
From the c't, 18.4.06:
The performance requirements are high in Multicam mode: The test machine was already at the fourth DV camera so strong in the knees, that a clean cut because of the strong jerk no more successful. C't test machine: Xeon 3.4 GHz, 2GB RAM
I'm scared!
@ Mr Joe: Okay, when you generierst your HDV camera pans from graphs, possibly with low compression. In some ****** HDV have decided (yes, yes, so synonymous has its good ...), that the data rate remains the same, and to cut one must then unpack the always ... I think that you can not compare like that. That you are in labor-intensive goods on up to 87% each come from, is so calming ...
btw:
Xeon or X2, where can I get more performance for the money? Idiologie The time now sidelined, my price range: about 4-500 euro for (the) Processor (s).
Antwort von Mr Jo:
@ tobsen
I quite believe that is a "Normal" Dual Core HDV Multitrax to its knees, if I observe suggesting my 4600 for speed s.den day, a slideshow into a 9:30 min HDV 1080 25p anamorphic WMV9 format to calculate: just under 4 hours sinds ..
So this is not a question - has shown only as noboundaries his problem, he has not even MultiCore support on his system, which was therefore my approach to his posting.
Anyone who deals with HDV, has basically not enough computing power. I think that it really makes no difference whether there now a 4200er or FX60 potters. According to a test at
Antwort von tobsen:
Were already planned in memory 2 GB with possibility of 3 (4). About the graphics card I had not made much thought. Well, thank you for your assessment.
