Frage von abcHD:
Hi, I use Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 on a Dual Core (2 * 2.53) 4GBRam, Vista. If I for example can render a sequence, or other editing, the task at that premiere is only about 50% of CPU power although otherwise uses almost no power is needed for other programs and is synonymous premiere is set to use both cores . The Ram is synonymous only about 1.5 GB total used.
Can I do something so that Premiere uses more power so as to work faster?
mfg Chris
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
You can turn your processor and the graphics card over clock as well as the processing priority to real-time, etc. ...
Antwort von abcHD:
The processing priority I have been synonymous for real-time, or set up. Nevertheless, only about 50% CPU used. About me bars would not really bring next. The processor has enough power, just will simply not exploited ..
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Chris
Video Editing - and specifically, motion estimation is a highly process-oriented cache that has not expired and the memory of the synonymous nature of the buffer and the requirements of the content depends, however, synonymous of how clever the software processes distributed.
So do not be surprised if the load is not your expectations. The interplay of hardware and software can not be so easy with "board means" change. Maybe you win with one or the other stunt a few "bars", but apparently effective improvements are mostly converted into heat.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
About me bars would not really bring next. Does not that I have tested it (rendering 10 minutes of HDV - video in PPCS3 with the Media Encoder, for example, Q6600 CPU):
Original 4x2, 4GHz: 19:21 Time demand
OC on 4x3, 0 GHz: 16:22 Time demand
To obtain a Q9450 CPU that gehts nochmal smooth 20% faster.
So your claim can not be maintained even if you have not done did ...
Antwort von Meggs:
Hard disks can be the bottleneck synonymous. If the disk (s) is not quick enough reads or writes, is bored of the processor for rendering.
Antwort von Daigoro:
It may be synonymous by the encoder depend on how many cores are used.
With the same editing program (Ulead Media Studio 8) and the same source material using the WMV encoder and FFMPG of both cores, the Quicktime (Windows) on a core eiert rum and takes twice as long loose. (others I do not use so often, when you could DivX synonymous but the 'professional' version need to make the nuclei more efficiently).
Look, if you have your goal for an alternative format encoder and find teste teste or so with different encoders (under Windows seems to WMV encoder, at least of the 'free consumer' parts) s.besten to run.
The affinity of the application you will hopefully not be changed manual. This has sometimes synonymous very strange effects.
Oh yes - in the preview, I can do what I want, more than one core, I do not get used - unfortunately, not synonymous with the newer Video Studio 11.5 +.
And whether the GPU support (up to 200 'stream' processors depending on the GPU) of Premiere Pro is synonymous in the element creates is not yet clear - and if so other providers failed to consider a change is probably necessary.
Does not that I have tested it (rendering 10 minutes of HDV - video in PPCS3 with the Media Encoder, for example, Q6600 CPU):
Original 4x2, 4GHz: 19:21 Time demand
OC on 4x3, 0 GHz: 16:22 Time demand
To obtain a Q9450 CPU that gehts nochmal smooth 20% faster.
Sure, but the savings are 3 minutes grad times about 20% performance increase. (which of course in the field of likely lies).
If used consistently all nuclei would be the (almost) two to four performance can be achieved. Using the GPU stream processor is even much more.
