Frage von SCHROTTfilm:
Walimex is the first film directed Primes for the smaller budget ago - with gear for the Folow Focus, labeled as RED and ZEISS optics of! \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Here's a test video that I made last week with the 14mm: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e http://youtu.be/ifE6IbpCWy8
Antwort von Bernd E.:
The Linked fish eye, according 4/3-Objectively description (suitable for the HDSLR E-5), but the M5 is just a.Capable e-fit of the m4/3-System: How is this possible? Does the Objectively identical with an adapter?
Antwort von Axel:
Still SLR Walser's answer to Magic. Annoying thing is the down-Walser-labeling, which acts like a yes yes! - Packaging. If you're satisfied with the quality is everything well. I am surprised that no longer the time to recognize the signs of Manufacturer and Primelchen build.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Maybe there's soon in the bazaar of Antalya beside the Adidas and Nike logos Selberaufbuegeln synonymous RED, Leica - and Zeiss lens tuning stickers for DIY? Demand would be as likely ;-)
Antwort von SCHROTTfilm:
Happy I am unfortunately not with the optics! After I present with micro 4/3 - the GH2 and the AF101 and work (as seen in my test video is http://youtu.be/ifE6IbpCWy8) about 1/3 of the area focussing not be used - the Schaerfeziehen it is not perfect! BUT: "Primelchen" - gefaelt me \u200b\u200b- when we recognize that all are really good hope, "Other" the tooth and the time we build more such "Primelchen"!
Antwort von iasi:
So because the photo lenses simply repackaged and provided with a toothing. \u003cbr /\u003e up to rather severe distortion to the 14/2.8 so do not be bad.
Antwort von Axel:
I Have To Do With film cameras, is now indeed been a while, I find funny in the context, however, think that an arsenal of movie Primes (16mm anyway, but synonymous 35mm) less a.eine skyline left rather than a.eine Pillendoeschen collection. MFT Lenses have been since the typical size. If you look at the contrast HDSLR monster ... \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Prices for quite possibly the cine primes so synonymous decline (bust Kodak, Arri cameras noAnalog produces more). The man can not adapt easily to MFT. Or am I wrong with both?
Antwort von iasi:
Tracking accuracy is not exactly an art with 8mm focal length. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e In addition, should a fish-eye lens is not just belong to the one used widely.
Antwort von Jott:
But, what is for you: Wide Angle Slomos with the 2K gecroppten Scarlet. Yes just go with fisheye.
Antwort von iasi:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von 7nic:
PL.
Antwort von SCHROTTfilm:
In Poland, an adapter for PL, 2/3 1/2 etc to:
Antwort von CameraRick:
Viewed another Question: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I assume that this fisheye of the Optics with the "normal" for 20 less identical, but is given a different aperture. \u003cbr /\u003e If this then be the T-Aperture, right?
Antwort von Axel:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von SCHROTTfilm:
mmh! If you borrow more synonymous - not buy - if the need arises! Not for private use - nice but that gives it that!
Antwort von iasi:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von CameraRick:
Not that Canon is going to infinity already a.Auflagemass seen only with lens adapter (if any) which greatly restricts the quality and gives additional crop. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e PL adapter for m4 / 3 is to be canon for the body to rebuild it already: \u003ca href=\
Antwort von iasi:
\u003cdiv class=\
