Frage von Helmut W.:
Hello.
Adobe's Production Suite advertises so that all applications and integrates nicely coordinated. For some time I am working with Premiere Pro 2 and am quite happy with it as far. Jeodch few encouraging moments where I was alone with the program s.die push boundaries, be it with animation, special effects or simple image enhancement tasks (entwackeln, color, etc.). Since I am with the other programs Prod.Suite (yet) have no experience, I would be times the typical workflow using the Programs of interest. In the brochures Although plausibly explains everything in it, but what about in practice really come from? Encore really uses it to create the DVDs, though one of the synonymous Premiere can do, etc.? I am superior to Prod.Suite upgrade, but would like to have confidence that the stuff then I really can use synonymous ;-) It would be nice if you give me just a few sentences you could describe how their approach and in the Project what role the respective applications.
Last but not least I would be interested to know whether it means the board of DVDs to create or use other formats (eg MainConcept MPEG encoder, etc.) or 3rd party tools to back (and why)?
I thank you very much!
- Helmut.
Antwort von Jörg:
Hi,
the workflow uses to describe really little, probably because everyone else is working.
Imagine just a stinknormales Project before you cut in AP, moves to AE for a typoanim, in the control AP. The Color of the text does not match the clip, return to AE, ready to adapt. Without rendering, exporting etc.Das happens once s.Ende the project.
Since you've set markers are the chapters prepared for Encore. Now AE is an animated menu manufactured buttons to be inserted from Photoshop, changes are simple steps to
angewendet.Sofort the existing files, without any calculation, save and update simple enough.
In between is every now and then in Audition s.Sound finishing, in this case, the workflow still to be improved.
Finally, everything in Encore DVD getoasted. If you have programs in the handle, it's as simple as described. It runs virtually trouble-free from your calculator provided at least equivalent to the maximum requirements of Adobe.
If you are then in between with your customers about the clipnotes discusses changes in the programs implemented quickly, then you know why a user for some time and again brought into the conversation "real time" program not even a tired smile has left.
Time savings can be reached with just multifaceted linked applications
cations as Prod.suite effective and even with this much more fun.
It is not necessarily more standalone encoder necessary, the main concept is integrated in the suite.
In my opinion, this is Adobe's product line with a big throw succeeded. Anyone who has been with the Apps worked, a great smile can be difficult to suppress if he enjoys the studio.
If you have written as a purchase recommendation to view, your perception is correct.
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von Wiro:
Hello,
as said at the Photokina someone at a workshop? There is nothing in the video field, what with Production Studio is not possible. Well, because we leave the church in the village better times ;-)
Encore really uses it to create the DVDs, though one of the synonymous Premiere can do? ... This is a typical example of such case:
quickly to a DVD just to sizzle after Encore will not change - that goes in Appro's like bread baking. But if you need advanced functionality, then you obviously like to Encore (the big brother) go through. After a certain induction time, the blood and no longer remembers that practically changes the program - you do it.
... whether it means the vehicle uses (ie MainConcept MPEG encoder, etc.) or 3rd party tools to back ... MainConcept has a worldwide reputation for its products at a very high level (not for nothing that they call "the codec's People", the codec with 80 senior engineers on the codec perhaps the greatest team the world has). The integrated presets are very diverse and cover all the standard requirements. And if one synonymous here 'more' needs, then the possibilities are virtually unlimited. What then of course, a certain know-how requires. But even you know ;-)
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Uwe:
Especially for the Production Studio, there are a few nice videos:
http://www.adobe.com/designcenter/productionstudio/articles/prs1am_newfeat.html
I share the enthusiasm of my durchklingende estimated prescribing, but there is, in my view, synonymous just a few things where I am sometimes a bit of a face warp + sometimes even slightly abgenervt am.
An important aspect for me is the constant realization that my calculator just too weak for a liquid working with the APS is. Although the P4 with 3.2 GHz, 2 GB Ram, Radeon 9600 XT ... not at all times soooo ne crutch is strange but I always painful when AE + PP + open the clips are to be processed, the power is simply too low ....
Then we must be clear in mind that working with the APS actually a "one-way street", ie of AE according to PP, after AE of Encore ... Take for instance from a ready-cut timeline in PP a clip in AE would like to edit, you can out of a PP out according to AE-Project on Creating a DL, you have the extra clip but then again of PP after AE copy. And then you get him in the trimmed version, but completely full-length on the AE timeline ...
The MC-Mpeg2 codec is undoubtedly a good, but he is in komischwerweise PP something to enjoy with caution. The same codec in Vegas for example, provides a slightly better quality than in PP - why this is? White of the devil ... Many suggest, therefore, not from PP Mpeg2 export. For a DVD Encore lets you better do the job (here, the MC is working again ... Or awarded for a conversion of HDV after SD is synonymous div recommendations do not necessarily have after PP Mpeg2 out to render ...
Nevertheless, the Adobe Production Studio, a bright shining star in the sky video ... :)
Antwort von wolodja:
An important aspect for me is the constant realization that my calculator just too weak for a liquid working with the APS is. Although the P4 with 3.2 GHz, 2 GB Ram, Radeon 9600 XT ... not at all times is soooo ne crutch I hope the people their adobe progs finally 64bit compatible.
=> more Ram.
Antwort von BeeZee:
The MC-Mpeg2 codec is undoubtedly a good, but he is in komischwerweise PP something to enjoy with caution. The same codec in Vegas for example, provides a slightly better quality than in PP - why this is? White of the devil ... Many suggest, therefore, not from PP Mpeg2 export. For a DVD Encore lets you better do the job (here, the MC is working again ... Or awarded for a conversion of HDV after SD is synonymous div recommendations do not necessarily have after PP Mpeg2 out to render ... Please? That is news to me. As can be denn sowas?
Can anyone confirm?
BZ.
Antwort von Kameramann:
Nonsense! Converting in MPEG2 encoder is a matter of who is at Premiere and Encore same (MainConcept), why should get out as different qualities?
Antwort von Jörg:
with nonsense, I would have given vorsichtig.Wo draufsteht main concept is synonymous main concept of it, aberrr: mc lt is for information only and the sole manufacturer of the program responsible for the implementation. So can
Apps various quite different versions or interpretations of a single encoder version occur.
Quite interesting it is, if a standalone encoder with implanted compared. So, a difference in quality is possible
to Encore's statements because of different users, which confirm this.
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von Uwe:
...: Mc lt is for information only and the sole manufacturer of the program responsible for the implementation. So can
Apps various quite different versions or interpretations of a single encoder version happen ...
In this direction must have the grounds for this are that the Mpeg2 encoding PP out partly as performing well.
There were times before about 11/2-2 years in digital video editing discussion forum with exactly this issue (viellecht or Jörg can still remember Wiro - find the thread, unfortunately not on the Fast). In any event, we then expressed the suspicion that it might in a more recent version of Encore MC gives the slightly better quality reasons.
Subsequently, I had myself a few tests done + synonymous came to the conclusion that an MPEG-Encoding in Encore with the setting to Automatic easily better results. Of course, this is so minimal that it is so easy to see when not noted. But when reinzoomen at 200% was seen already slightly larger artefacts in Comparison to Encore encoding.
During the time I've seen threads similar times with similar remarks read. These fits are often published comparisons of MPEG-Encodings between PP + Vegas, which are almost always in favor of Vegas fail, although synonymous same MCMpeg encoder is s.arbeiten.
The last time it was with a perfectly credible technical test, which is the best way to a down-scaling of HDV material to SD for DVD went. Here's the link:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=70792
Re-cut the MPEG encoding of Premiere Pro visibly poorly. Vegas again better with the same MC-encoder ..
