Frage von Hans-Peter:
Hello,
So: In reality I have not the money for these cameras, but I wonder go:
1. Lately I see a lot of reportage about the turn of shooting, eg on Wild Guys, Click, Harry Potter and I am interested in simple cameras with which these films are rotated, although I know that they either be rotated to Panavision or ARRI. Perhaps even know there is someone better and I can helfen.Welche brand delivers better pictures?
2. Yesterday I saw a report about the ProSieben fairy tale hour, and with Special Needs, I would like to know what cameras will work with Fernshn, I always recognize only the scheiwerfer of ARRI.
Thank you very much
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Since there are cameras, so to speak, unnecessary to the question of which of the two brands makes better pictures. It is a lens issue, and that in turn depends on the particular theme (edit: and of course on the footage ... how well the images, however, depends heavily on photography and all other departments of an illusion-film production).
And when working in television to film, which is usually an Arriflex SR 2 to 3, 416 and sometimes synonymous recently Aaton cameras.
Otherwise, rotated on video.
Antwort von Hans-Peter:
but I can hardly imagine that one on TV Produtions to 35mm as it rotates so enormously much does all this scan, etc. ..
But I'm interested synonymous with what they turn the TV cameras? (video)
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
So yes it turns on 16mm/Super16mm. The aforementioned models are in this format.
There are several dozen different video cameras, which are used for TV productions. Maybe because someone else knows better.
Antwort von Louis:
hm so the tv turning meitenes on 16mm, and sometimes only with 8mm!
for live transfers, reportagen or similar (I believe is synonymous) have often digitally rotated so on DVCAM or DVCPRO, etc.!
Antwort von Lucky_Lucky:
I know myself while out with 35mm and digital, of 16mm but I have no idea, I always thought it was almost the same as 35mm but that seems not to be so, or? you do not have to scan around 16mm, or how does it work??
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Check out time on a yardstick to 16mm and 35mm. As you will easily see the difference:)
One 16mm scans synonymous.
8mm on television. But this is a rarity!
Antwort von Lucky_Lucky:
scan then why do you take not synonymous with 35mm cameras watching TV when they provide better qualitative and are synonymous??
Antwort von PowerMac:
hm so the tv turning meitenes on 16mm, and sometimes only with 8mm!
for live transfers, reportagen or similar (I believe is synonymous) have often digitally rotated so on DVCAM or DVCPRO, etc.! You are talking utter nonsense.
On television, there is no 8mm, except at times nem music video from Hamburg. The rest is 16mm, for example, the crime scene. Pro7 synonymous rotates times on 35mm. For live broadcasts are not "synonymous often digitally rotated" broadcast, but digitally. A rotary incidentally, means something other than a live broadcast. And on live broadcasts will not be used, of course, DVCAM, DVCPRO, as well as this a is a Aufzeichungsformat in the camera. There uncompressed 4:4:4 is expected in the broadcast technology to 4:2:2 in 8 bit and then output in 4:2:0. Reports are usually Digibeta, DVCAM or DVCPRO50. DVCPRO is used more as a news format for highway accidents.
Antwort von Lucky_Lucky:
hm so the tv turning meitenes on 16mm, and sometimes only with 8mm!
for live transfers, reportagen or similar (I believe is synonymous) have often digitally rotated so on DVCAM or DVCPRO, etc.!
You are talking utter nonsense.
On television, there is no 8mm, except at times nem music video from Hamburg. The rest is 16mm, for example, the crime scene. Pro7 synonymous rotates times on 35mm. For live broadcasts are not "synonymous often digitally rotated" broadcast, but digitally. A rotary incidentally, means something other than a live broadcast. And on live broadcasts will not be used, of course, DVCAM, DVCPRO, as well as this a is a Aufzeichungsformat in the camera. There uncompressed 4:4:4 is expected in the broadcast technology to 4:2:2 in 8 bit and then output in 4:2:0. Reports are usually Digibeta, DVCAM or DVCPRO50. DVCPRO is used more as a news format for highway accidents. jaja already clear as I can keep ned as fussy but I wanted to be synonymous ned!
Antwort von PowerMac:
Then do it is not synonymous ...
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
You should cite only a few sentences to which they relate it to. The quote of all contributions should be avoided as much as possible, because we are able to associate your answer with the overlying post (and still synonymous next above it).
Synonymous is a general forum rule, to avoid pointless to scroll.
Antwort von sprec000:
There are times an overview of the film formats:
http://sprec000.xardas.lima-city.de/Digicam5.html
From 16mm to 70mm IMAX films, however, are relevant to almost all 16mm and 35mm. A difference between 16mm and 35mm can be seen in HDTV resolutions, especially when in low light with hochempfindl. Footage was rotated. There is simply too grainy 16mm ...
For the normal PAL signals (standard TV in Europe) but it is relatively unimportant, although for high-quality broadcasts (eg, "A Case for Two") by ZDF well in home theaters with large screens yet to notice ...
Antwort von Jammin:
Are there any features and news articles in HDV or MiniDV?
If they do, are paid less than the other format?
Antwort von PowerMac:
Nope, not necessarily - no one needs to know, what was produced. DV is often on a Digibeta tape-and without that one knows or sees. The price can not be runterbrechen solely on the recording format. For DV-shoots often consist of cheap one-man video journalists, or small or even amateur film crews. Both are quite common together, which of course explains Low Prices. DV-shoots are often cheaper, and the final product achieved more s.Markt lower Prices. I would still say that correlate rather untalented writers and poor quality DV cameras, or that you believe. That would be a further reason for low Prices. In the news business is a DV recording with the same content cheaper than a Digibeta recording. But in the news business, the primary factor determining the price of Exclusivity and informative. DV cameras with the same versatility and portability, and unobtrusive, and sometimes made a sensational catch and fast images. A great camera might be here too lazy and complacent and would be quickly noticed.
 |
Antwort von M-Culture:
Nice thread and informative.
After
http://sprec000.xardas.lima-city.de/Digicam5.html
SonyHDR then Fx1 which would be a digital equivalent? 35mm film?
I can not at the present .. synonymous but I am a layman, admittedly dimensions.
Antwort von FCP User:
SonyHDR then Fx1 which would be a digital equivalent? 35mm film? You be not comparable, because FX1 is more in the consumer area.
For 35mm film, there is still no real counterpart, the RED Cam will probably be one.
Otherwise gegenstück to 16mm, I would see a maximum in ner ner thick Varicam or HDCAM.
