Frage von konkil:
Hello
I currently own the Canon HV20. With this camera I was satisfied. She has served for holiday videos and movies for myself
Now I get more and more requests to my friends and relatives, if I usHochzeiten, film, etc. can confirmations.
Smaller shops here in town do commercials. One I've done before. This film came now to still others.
I am of the opinion that the HV20 is no longer sufficient. Therefore, I wanted to inform me which camera is s.geschicktesten for my use.
The whole time I had DV cameras. The only thing that bothers me because the transmission time on the PC.
What Camera (hand or shoulder camera) to 2000 ¬ you can recommend?
Requirements:
Good-shooting in a dark place (no noise)
HD recordings (of course)
Synonymous-like SD, CF, DV
- Focus manual adjustable
Antwort von glider_pilot:
How about then with a DSLR?
Antwort von konkil:
I wanted a video camera.
I've often heard that make DSLRs horny shots.
Prefer won a video camera.
Not a Still Image with video function.
Antwort von domain:
Without XLR connections as well off as nothing, a native of useful wide angle and manual focus are obligate synonymous.
http://www.google.at/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=http% 3A% 2F 2Fwww.canon.at%%% 2FFor_Home 2FProduct_Finder 2FCamcorders%%% 2Fprofessional 2FXA10% 2F & ei = TzFZTfXSKZC1hAeOsZjFDA & usg = AFQjCNHMINyxHfN5a7vTFKX4wEUrcR1Hdg
Antwort von KrischanDO:
Hi,
Look at you around for a used SonyEX1. There is already a follow-Model (EX1 R), with some small improvements, with the EX1 to work perfectly. (Am I in over two years).
VDSLR is a nice thing because of the collapsing depth. But that shoot a wedding? Have fun. Moreover, the whole rig and audio noise is already costing a chunk.
Greetings
Christian
Antwort von rush:
I think with the usual handle men ala XH-A1, HMC151, AX2000 you ever get into a very good area for the relevant tasks. Are slightly over your budget ... .
The smaller-called XA10 could fit '... and fits better into your budget.
With a DSLR it might be tight ... Since they would probably get at least 2 cameras are used - if only because they actually tend to turn off after 20-30 minutes ... The look is already nice. But Tonproblem remains and the handling ...
The "Image" to the customer through one may never forget synonymous ...
Recently at a small image rotation with DSLR was the saying ... "How ... with a camera?"
The pictures convinced the customer but then - but one can never exclude Anfangsskepzis:)
Antwort von marwie:
The "Image" to the customer through one may never forget synonymous ...
Recently at a small image rotation with DSLR was the saying ... "How ... with a camera?"
The pictures convinced the customer but then - but one can never exclude Anfangsskepzis:) Guess with Rig, matte box etc. This problem can be fix something :-)
Antwort von konkil:
The picture should be synonymous but not as noise. ie large image sensor.
The XA10 is a 1 / 3 "
this is already pretty darn good or did you even better, that is my expectations.
Antwort von shipoffools:
The picture should be synonymous but not as noise. ie large image sensor.
The XA10 is a 1 / 3 "
this is already pretty darn good or did you even better, that is my expectations. 1 / 3 "sounds like the first place, measured by old standards, not particularly good, but if one reads the following excerpt from the description of the Canon-XA10, you probably have to rethink something ...
Quote Product Info Canon XA10:
"HD CMOS Sensor Pro
The HD CMOS sensor camcorders Pro was originally of Canon for use in its profits and develop suitable designs. It is characterized with a native 1,920 x 1,080 dpi on Resolutionvon. - The pixels are 2.6 times larger than in many CMOS sensors ensure that a higher light absorption, particularly brilliant full-HD quality, an increased dynamic range and improved performance in low Light. " If it's really so ...
Antwort von pilskopf:
Clearly in the requirements for a DSLR. Synonymous nut fits well with weddings. Exemption of the objects is here but the A and O. Part of the romance they achieve.
Antwort von scrooge:
I have recently filmed a wedding commission.
7 hours shooting, about 30 hours editing. But the pay was for full fine.
I have shot with the Canon HV30. Because the camera's not like the best Wide Anglehat I have a Raynox Wide Angle had during the entire shoot in front (close zoom I had not used).
Together with a fairly large solar panel saw the camera will not even run small - especially since I've even attached a strap with a directional microphone.
For my clients, there was no skepticism because of the equipment - and they were synonymous with the film very happy. :-)
It does not have to be equal to the expensive mmer Henkelmann.
CU
Hartmut
Antwort von nicecam:
Oh pils head, you're so
prolific radical! -
Please note the pun ;-)=) Did you have a Damascus experience? From Saul to Paul? Or vice versa?
When did you have it? How did you experience it?
Can I go with you in teaching?
Where you offer them?
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Questions, questions! :-)
Antwort von rush:
* Laughs * nicecam was not bad;)
I still wonder why not Pilspkopf of Panasonic can be financed;) a better "Promoman" do not get the * g *
Seriously ... DSLR is as I said in the case of a wedding rather than complement or multi-camera operation to recommend ... Clearly one can thereby sometimes producing artistically beautiful images - but often precedes the pair just synonymous for more:)
For image / movie advertising matters, however, you can work with a DSLR really very good.
Antwort von domain:
The Tonsektion may not be neglected completely, it often makes 50% of the video is out and with mini-jack on its own bitter experience not easy to manage.
Moreover, it is not so much on the pure clarity (as in the HM 400 + followers) but photographic synonymous in a very different image features.
Antwort von susy:
DSLR Promotional Film
But at a wedding constantly - how long does a wedding? Let's say - 5 hours to pull the sharpness could be stressful, right?
And longer than 1 hour without pause, one should not film with a DSLR, the sensor is then synonymous overloaded real.
Antwort von pilskopf:
But I recommend but not even a Pana. : D The most beautiful wedding videos that I've seen, all with a DSLR rotated. I les containing the requirements and da halt ne fits DSLR. But just in bad light, but is misleading because what such a DSLR can capture even brighter than our own eye. : D Much brighter even I thought I'd get noticed a few days in a dark karaoke booth. Simply awesome cool what you can capture with a DSLR Sun The possibilities are just one never has, without large sensor.
And what do you mean take more than an hour of field? You get paid for this, one has to work, have fun do not do that if you get paid for it. The part of the job but to synonymous. And as bad as it is now synonymous times not as if every second, the focus must move. It is ne of the distance issue, the Motive, a question of Aperture. But his work is already synonymous, at least we know s.Ende what you get paid. AF is what lazy. : D
Antwort von rush:
DSLR Promotional Film
But at a wedding constantly - how long does a wedding? Let's say - 5 hours to pull the sharpness could be stressful, right?
And longer than 1 hour without pause, one should not film with a DSLR, the sensor is then synonymous overloaded real. Said yes, the "minor" problems yet;)
Usually one can only record synonymous p.20-30 minutes s.Stück - stupid when it reached the file limit at the wrong moment ...
Or if one picks up the sound separately .. much fun to create in the post at hundreds of video snippets and a few continuous audio files from audio recorder ... :)
@ Pils head: They were then produced but synonymous very expensive and usually not with one but several DSLR's;) As a one-man show we go to no chance the slider, by the way of leading the Steadicam and to catch synonymous nor eien view of the audience ... As I said - with several DSLR's I see no real problem as synonymous ... but it need be synonymous dan the manpower and the financial flexibility to lift something:) Then isses geil in any case.
ps @ pils head: we know that you are fanboy-pana;) synonymous without specifically mentioning it * g * matches it.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Out of action. : D ISO 2500 I think. It was real stock took a shower there. Your own eye hath not seen as bright looks like the recording. Aperture 0.95. What more could you want? As each failed Cam with a small chip. At Ner wedding is synonymous duster, as it will still deliver good shots right? For me, these are just Cams the moving image record, whether Henkel or DSLR, I do not like that of no preference whether one calls the Videocam or clippers, what is recorded, the Dynamics, the sharpness, the colors, that is the what is important in moving image. I tend to past experience with the machines that offer a larger sensor and Wechelobjektive offer. The difference is more than visible, he cries out. The possibilities for picture composition are higher by many times, especially in different quality. We simply have more freedom.
Antwort von rush:
Aperture 0.95. What more could you want? I am afraid to use only the very few such bright optics ... Soup and a zoom of the bottom far far away with Aperture of bad until we want to hear rather not, unfortunately, does not help much.
Apart from that, you have to open the aperture for more than just provide sharp, otherwise only a sharp eye on the bride when she moves minimal: D
And shoot 'ne wedding with turning a single fixed focal length /? I would find even ventured out of photographer's perspective right - if you were the only photographer:)
