Infoseite // Quality criteria / Film judge

Frage von film_orbit:


Hello

Have a question about quality criteria for a foreign production can be assessed.

I think because zBsInhalt (may not be abusive, obscene, etc.) or s.den sound, the Picture, etc.

Can someone tell me whether there are such criteria already exist somewhere?

THANK YOU and hopefully see you soon.



Antwort von robbie:

Now yes, there is on one side the purely subjective quality, whether I like the video. because there is no available
Then there is the objective quality of life, where I say the video is well done.
as you can in accordance with specific criteria investigated. camera work, editing, dubbing, ...

and then we have the technical quality. Simply fit the needs. there is nothing to shake, and there is synonymous own guidelines ...

tell us more times what you did before. maybe we can help you sometime ...



Antwort von film_orbit:

Hello

Thanks for the reply.
The subjective quality is not relevant.
Are there any helpful links on the WWW, the qualitative aspects of the film describe it?

The point is that films are viewed and must be due to a criteria list or "quality list, they will be reviewed. There should be a sort of checklist available, so that screening can be carried out.

Thanks and greetings



Antwort von Matoff:

normalized film world?
Please do not ...
the subjective assessment is s.wichtigsten ...
otherwise would have some indie films never enforced.
gruß cj



Antwort von PowerMac:

My criteria:

Good movie
Yes: No



Antwort von DWUA:

Like DSDS.
Only takes longer.

;)



Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:

"film_orbit" wrote: There should be a sort of checklist available, so that screening can be carried out.

Hm, you might want to start a video-out Competition? Because something is needed ... But since I kind of "clubs for mutual Beweihräucherung" avoid like the plague, I can only guess, as for example, goes:

Technique: each juror can be 0 - 5 (or 10 or whatever synonymous always) points. If the film is technically well done? So, no glitches by slovenliness ...
Story: the story in a coherent and logically tell?
etc. etc.
Because then you can score for his personal impression forgiven. As an example: someone has a certain scene from the hand rotated, clear, wobbles a bit. If it's a landscape film is there for me the heavy prints. Is this a documentary of ... hm ... any concert "backstage", I would of course give no deductions.

Lenses quality MAY not exist. Take, for example, times "Stalker" (Andrei v. Arsenjewitsch film Tarkowski), just gestern mal angeschaut:
"Wikipedia" wrote: Tarkowski), just gestern mal angeschaut:

Photography
The film weaves together a dreary world naked nauseous misery and rejection by the masterful camera work, staging and immersion of the black and white in the color of his Broms perfect aesthetics wins - a seemingly insurmountable the contrast resolution.

As in all subsequent shooting Tarkowskis is the camera work in conjunction with moving people, balancing bildkompositorischer weights and fill the general content of the image of perfection. This is Tarkowski scene even for the responsible image. These are the relatively frequent in Tarkowski irritations such as cut feet or other, in the traditional photography as a serious and considered amateurish errors to - a divergence between the demands of the scene image on a page, as well as playable and the difficulties of the camera shot on the other. Tarkowski), just gestern mal angeschaut:

Technically the film is at first sight at all (!!!) cannon, although the allegedly is the second version (Tarkowski should have burned the first ...). The contrasts are so high, it is believed in some places (especially in the S / W-passages), an ancient MAZ from the seventies to see.
Tarkowski has "error" purposely used to film his way. "Stalker" is not a perfect film, but close, very close! How can we but the rate?

Maybe you looking for a club (würg) near you, or look at the Bundesverband whether sowas have.

BG, Andreas

PS: "Stalker" is a year ago on DVD, but very expensive.

PPS: "Stalker" is my very nice for a no-budget film. Half a dozen actors, ruin scenery ...



Antwort von B.DeKid:

@ Film_orbit

Here, if you really for an event / film competition these "criteria" are looking for, then perhaps use a map / flyer to each of the spectators and the jury must fill (may be).

My brother has "Memento" and will never understand, but "Last Friday" super.

What does that tell us .... nobody knows whether chocolate ice cream better than vanilla ice cream, or statistics lie immer.Das the most important criterion should be what you should keep everything else is un fair.

Quote: I think because zBsInhalt (may not be abusive, obscene, etc. ..... this is true probably only on Catholic educational films that do not educate ;-(



Antwort von Schleichmichel:

"Andreas_Kiel" wrote: PPS: "Stalker" is my very nice for a no-budget film. Half a dozen actors, ruin scenery ...

... a little talent, a certain attitude and the gift, a movie very poetic way, mind you, without giving effect to the almost unbearable pathos abzurutschen, as it certainly times occurs when a film maker, on Tarkowski does not and can-a God of sound mixing ...

Question: In-I believe-TV movie there are these columns with asterisks. There are some subdivisions such as "tension," "erotic," "Humor" and "right" ... or something. Then a Conclusion, what the editors think about this.

But if it involves the evaluation of mass submissions, then you is not intuitive, subjective and analytical assessments around. For what should the assessment be? For a festival or a film school?

No, because it is through. But you can still categorize as one of the sound, the picture, cutting, etc. has fallen. This does not necessarily lead to an overall impression, as these things are so intertwined and form a synthesis. The sound like a strange quality. But as he is, he is actually exact, etc.






Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:

"Surreptitious Michel" wrote:
... a little talent, a certain attitude and the gift, a movie very poetic way, mind you, without giving effect to the almost unbearable pathos abzurutschen, as it certainly times occurs when a film maker, on Tarkowski does not and can-a God of sound mixing ...
The need is for every (serious) movie ... I imagine the non-synonymous than copying (euphemistically: "Homage", -)) or simple After turning in front, rather than re-telling from other (clearly subjective) view. Because the motif of "Stalker" has Tarkowski yes no just invented - but first told.
In fact, almost everyone says that Werbeclip of hopes, aspirations ... or?
BG, Andreas



Antwort von Maik:

"film_orbit" wrote:
I think because zBsInhalt (may not be abusive, obscene, etc.)

I think that summarizes commonly in 'morality' together
where the definitions are synonymous.

A film will be rated by the audience.
Like it or like it's not.

That's it.

M.



Antwort von Andreas_Kiel:

"film_orbit" wrote:
I think because zBsInhalt (may not be abusive, obscene, etc.)
"Wikipedia" wrote: As is obscene, which is suitable for other people to excite disgust, shame or some other elemental feeling hurt.
I can imagine, for example, that an anti-war film or a film against torture must be obscene to even more impact. Yes, and this film should be synonymous to moral insult.
See news from Iraq and Afghanistan: here are a few shredded auto show (which is equal to the brothers in the Westerwald Ludolf could find), s.and s.mal an ambulance and a few people crying s.Rand of events.
Is this a real picture of war? If this is not extremely trivialized? If so synonymous films are made, no viewers understand what is happening now because of the war really means. Without this knowledge must be no democracy in its soldiers to send this war.
So how do you evaluate a war movie? I would have succeeded him, when one of these unspeakable "still hold, we send out one thousand times" Schreiern during the premiere vomits ;-)
Here: http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=cezKnz6gLOk is almost too subtly done.
BG, Andreas