Frage von Meisterign:
Have a problem with the Recording, the Final Cut of my DV camera makes. Previously I've worked with Vegas 7 and the quality of the recordings was simply better. I've now taken the same scene with both programs and the VLC media player and compared the AVI file looks better than the Quicktime file. Final Cut The recordings are all a bit blurred.
Do you know what's wrong it? Because you can adjust the recording before you nothing.
MFG
Philipp
Antwort von PowerMac:
The reason is that films can not s.PC screen may judge.
Why Final Cut Pro make everything blurred? How? Final Cut Pro is your data tape from the camcorder, and stores it in a Quicktime container. Do you think Final Cut Pro everything while still applying a blur run?
Antwort von WoWu:
Have you in Final Cut Pro in an intermediate codec to work?
How did you get your input and output done?
Since differences may exist if you have the codecs used in NLEs and why should Vegas do not have better codec than Final Cut Pro?
I agree with PM but since right s.den containers (QT / AVI) it will certainly not lie.
Antwort von Meisterign:
But if I have both in s.selben Screen Comparison run, I can have an assessment or allow? If yes, the same conditions.
Input via firewire I made in FCE and just about "Studio" on the tape and played me the "raw" viewed and compared.
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Philipp
Of course, you can have a direct comparison and if the Vegas software delivers better results than the Final Cut Pro / FCE software, there's no doubt.
The theme is just a bit more complex and s.den "transport envelopes" AVI or QT can not lie, however.
The programs will vary depending on the projects is a setting from which the corresponding synonymous codec revealed. Here, after a difference in my presumption is that the quality synonymous differences justified.
For a closer look but can you have to give slightly more information.
That is unfortunately impossible to perform.
But if you Vegas with good experiences do, why not Vegas? Will you then against on FCE, I am confident that you're with the right settings synonymous ebenwertige pictures out of them.
Antwort von Meisterign:
Is it to Vegas for Mac? I am of Windows to Mac transition. times and I wanted to explore Final Cut, because I really only heard good. and it is synonymous a very good program. Only took me the quality more negatively surprised.
My Camera delivers 16:9 anamorphic images with 720 to 567 pixels. That I have everything in Final Cut set. More settings can be pre-recording of my knowledge so do not do.
If you know of Final Cut did, I would like to go with a messenger with you entertained.
IChat account is billyesser@mac.com
ICQ 173631137
Antwort von Axel:
You both look at different screens of different computers? That perhaps explains the differences.
Antwort von Meisterign:
No. both on the screen of my Macbook with VLC Player.
Antwort von PowerMac:
There is no explanation for the problem, which here is made out to be existent.
There are no more than explanations of why you methodically wrong orders and did nothing proven. And this is why: In general, a picture or image assessment s.Computermonitoren comparison (between different synonymous) is not possible and inadmissible. Pixels can be misrepresented, somewhat due to the pixel aspect ratio of approximately 1067. It is the wrong color space (RGB vs. YCrCb) and the wrong frame rate (60Hz vs. 50Hz/25Hz) and computer monitors are due to LCD (different image structures at different LCD types such as TN, IPS or VA, and some have grid patterns, others act kirstallin , poor black levels, etc.) rather unsuitable for image comparisons. A picture comparison s.gleichen Monitor synonymous would be wrong, but still better than between two different computer monitors. There can be lots of differences. Around since Mac and PC use, such as a gamma value of false.
The VLC is certainly not an appropriate program to image differences to prove. The VLC has a built in Quicktime decoder, which is not of Apple Quicktime and material may not be perfect and therefore interpreted with reduced sharpness shows. Perhaps the VLC synonymous the aspect ratio of Quicktime does not read and therefore shows the material easy to distort. Approximately 768 horizontal pixels instead of 720 Next to Vegas material. Or the 720x576 of Vegas will be displayed 1:1 pixel accuracy, which is opposed to Quicktime 768x576 stretched. Also possible. Or vice versa. Could you find out. Because if it is misinterpreted, you get of course a blur, because the material must be scaled. A scaling in the area means blur. Since it is 16:9, this is even worse is possible. The material should be of 720 pixel to 1024 will be stretched horizontally. Some programs expect but synonymous to 1020 (or even 960) in width. Missing pixels and explain blur. I guess either of the 16:9 of the Vegas or Final Cut Pro are not a perfect square pixels displayed. VLC handles probably different for different codecs. In addition, between moving images and still images to differentiate. Since no official VLC Quicktime codec s.Bord, he probably a codec for DV-PAL, who can play well, but with still images schwächelt. Perhaps the most well-VLC DV Avis upsamplen and so improve. It is synonymous unclear whether you may be in Super White and Super Black've filmed, what the VLC again be interpreted differently, depending on the codec. Also a source of error is when you do not exactly compare the same frame, but a difference between one or more frames has. Then one compares not the same. For example, a Picture Bewegungsunschärfen occur later. The VLC makes it easy not really the same frame to show the forward frame is just as difficult.
So if there actually is a real observable difference, everything on a representation problem. Files, which in FCE gecapturt can not be distinguished from the material from the tape. The data of Firewire and are simply in Quicktime files or container. Quicktime to blame, one could only push into the shoes when you are with the Quicktime player and then blurred or see a bad picture. This would mean that its Quicktime video data decoded partially bad. There is a problem in DVCPRO, which is 4:1:1 dissolved. There, the DVCPRO codec in Quicktime problems when playing / interpreting. The material has Farbkämme and stage effects in the color red. This is quite different. You should therefore s.zwei same video monitors to assess the sharpness. Per SDI is connected and each have the same frames (controlled by time code).
Antwort von Axel:
The above is correct. Go take a Quicktime movie (for example, as I have just a. Dv from iMovie) in parallel with Quicktime and the VLC. Completely different, including the wrong pixel aspect ratio. Strangely, the VLC material but sharper, as nachgeschärft, to be exact. So in any case a reference to nothing.
