Questions about TMPGEnc (; And believe me, NOT the usual)
Frage von Harald: März 2006
Whoops!
I accidentally got on ne wrong button. I was not even finished with the thing. Did this code thing with just messing around to create a table. Werds hinterherposten LEGIBLY same again ...
Sorry
Antwort von Harald:
So now once again properly. Ne table I get in there not down here. Even if all those reading this now who have already read the above post yes. No matter.
I really wanted to "TMPGEnc" collected in the thread in the freeware for the freeware library will begin. To be sure again that (; or how far it is synonymous) really is freeware, I wanted to make smart BRIEFLY times at manufacturer's site - and lo and behold, I was suddenly in a web of dangerous half-knowledge about the software TMPGEnc caught. I've never used it, but often times can read about it and maybe someone who has already worked with it or otherwise bring something to tell white, light in the dark world of TMPGEnc.
Correctly, the software family well, "called Tsunami MPEG," as I have understood that. Only then is apparently a Japanese Manufacturer called Pegasys ( "; http://www.pegasys-inc.com), of the software" TMPGEnc "calls, and an American subsidiary called" TSUNAMI " (; http://www.tmpg-inc.com), which the software "TSUNAMI MPEG," calls it. In addition, the software family can be divided into the following products, depending on the Manufacturer be offered or not offered:
TMPGEnc (, Japan): - DVD Author - XPress 3.0 - MPEG Editor - Pros 2.5 - DVD Source Creator
TSUNAMI MPEG (; USA): - DVD Author - DVD Author Pro - Video Encoder XPress - DVD EasyPack Suite - Media Editor
So Now gehts schon los synonymous with the questions: which of these Programs or packages, then, is this "TMPGEnc" Of the reported everywhere and is referred to again and again? My guess: Because it should go to an MPEG encoder that can actually come from only 3 in question: - TMPGEnc 3.0 XPress - TSUNAMI MPEG Video Encoder XPress - TMPGEnc 2.5 Pros But what is it now?
What I could not figure out is synonymous, which expires when in fact the MPEG-2 encoding. Two theories: (, 1) I may be long after the first run the. Exe 30 days encode MPEG-2. That means I can create MPEG-2 movies, and while so many I want, and p.31. Day after the first run of the program is concluded with MPEG-2. (, 2) Or the "Countdown" will run only if I actually create an MPEG-2. That means I can take 30 days to perform MPEG-2 Encodiervorgänge these 30 days but can be spread over five years for example.
Or how can we understand exactly please?
In the FAQ I've read of a version of TMPGEnc, which expired after 30 days and NOT the there http://www.henrik-reimers.de/downloads/tmpge.zip available for download. Habs mir mal concern and it is according to the "About" dialog to the beta version 12a (; 0.11.20.98), which is probably) of 1998 (;?. I let my views be surprised what happens after 30 days. Suppose they should work as described, because it makes any sense to use such an outdated Encoder?
So now I hope to information of you. At least (one can, and I'm not me) complain that they have not already been searched - than s.den wrong places. And if you want to ask me why I want to know that even in such detail, I can only reply: I'm sorry, but I am somehow very last detail.
PS Sorry again for my "mis-layouts to" first post.
Gruss, Harald
Antwort von Kurtz:
Unfortunately you can not answer, but if you're lucky your first post of administrator is a nice DELETED ...
Antwort von Gast1:
Have your essay now only flown over: TMPGEnc.net is the homepage of the developer. The variant that there are i free, but makes only MPEG-1, which is royalty free. Pegasys is marketing the commercial version, which can be synonymous MPEG-2. As a trial probably only 14 days, then announced Buy. 12a The variant dates from the time when the developer's encoder has made just for fun. As he well knew not that the Manufacturer of an encoder for MPEG-2 at pay more than a time limited beta s.MS royalties and must have the variant 12a placed indefinitely into the net. Later, he allegedly paid a lump sum for s.MS. No idea how "outdated" of the encoder. Slowly, he is good. Resources for domestic use, in any case well enough. The application is completely legal MUs.
Antwort von Harald:
"Gast1" wrote:
Have your essay now only flown over:
Yes, you're absolutely right. I see it almost synonymous as a "memoir," nor because this my first post was shot too early ".
"Gast1" wrote:
12a The variant dates from the time when the developer's encoder has made just for fun. As he well knew not that the Manufacturer of an encoder for MPEG-2 at pay more than a time limited beta s.MS royalties and must have the variant 12a placed indefinitely into the net.
Yes, I've read synonymous.
Tomorrow I'll look at the times TMPGEnc.net - I now schaff anymore.
Excuse me if I was with my questions been plucked into the loo. This made me stop've always interested. Still leaves us with this 30-day thing ...
Ah, yes, even in passing: Woe unto you type in the browser http://www.tmp e genc.net. Then you land on a Page with the text at the top of the window: Here are your heroic search results. The triffts quite good, I think ...
Antwort von coconut:
"Harald" wrote:
Please .... Apologies if I have issues with my totally unfounded in the toilet. This made me stop've always interested. Still leaves us with this 30-day thing ... ...
The 30 days are in the 2.5x version. I'm on it, so I know das That means after 30 days no mpeg2 more ..... no preference whether you used it or not.
Antwort von Markus:
Hello Harald,
I have deleted your first post. If you feel here in the forum as a user registering, then you can edit your own posts. ;-)
