Frage von Tobias Claren:
Hello.
I am unsure whether there is in the optics of the Wide Angled Raynox HD-6600pro of differences in the Optics.
Or whether any HD-6600Pro can use the same well s.einer Camera.
Here I have a HD 6600Pro 58 and an adapter ring on 40.5.
I had the extra mentioned, but one could not see a problem there.
It's not synonymous, so that the 58mm version was more expensive
I can not determine whether the synonymous Picture is best.
Submit photos upload, or may differ from the video in terms of quality?
Or I can judge someone like that?
Were it not HD2000 users with this WW-Converter?
I can produce material on request (please specify then was).
Antwort von kalle70:
The question I asked some time ago the Manufacturer itself.
The answer then was that there is the same HD6600Pro with different thread sizes.
Antwort von Tobias Claren:
Just so we do not misunderstand us, I mean if the lenses are identical.
So Raynox only one body part with other Studio installed.
I have again kept the adapter on the lens, the difference is not so great. I thought maybe it covers off a lot. But synonymous with 58mm (also probably the largest version) WW itself is an edge on it.
Are there still any theoretically conceivable reason why one is different to a 43er or 58er 52-in mapping s.einer Camera? There is 40.5er it not, if possible by the increased distance differences were, they would not be avoided in the case.
I just do not know as I do now is to assess the quality.
Antwort von srone:
I just do not know as I do now is to assess the quality. quite simply, either you are satisfied with the picture or not, or is the high loss with converter or see no difference.
everything else is in this price class nitpicking.
lg
SRone
Antwort von Tobias Claren:
I do not have what Comparison example with a different camera with WW that could be better.
What do you mean "in this price range"? Are not cheap. Are there any significantly more expensive for these devices? So not just a ¬ 10,000-WW for a camera;).
If the Picture has now evil deterioration, one would have to waive it.
Antwort von srone:
did you write the converter above you, screw on it in and make an image, the same thing, or an excerpt of it (less ww) without a converter, both images can be compared but now does not it?
it's all about your camera and therefore how your converter behaves s.einer others.
in absolute terms, the Raynox not bad for the price, but rich in their illustration services do not (and s.gute twice to four times and more) so expensive original approach, which are expected in some cases is specific to particular models of converters, of still more expensive third-party to all of silent, century, Schneider-Kreuznach etc are, but synonymous in the 4 digit range.
google test charts once there you will find templates for tests, you will find that your converter has deficiencies, but how and whether the images in real sichtbarauswirkt taste you can only find out by yourself.
busy yourself with a good visual design rather than the display of your digital camera to scan distortion, which is much more essential and will use your film more.
lg
SRone
Antwort von Tobias Claren:
Without HD 6600Pro:
http://s2.imgimg.de/uploads/SanyoHD200083a79295JPG.jpg
With HD 6600Pro:
http://s2.imgimg.de/uploads/SanyoHD2000RaynoxHD6600Pro0b92a4e5JPG.jpg
The image design is not the problem (http://forum.slashcam.de/taufe-ablauf-meine-vorstellungen-and-eure-tipps-oder-kritik-vt81262.html?start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight =), I just want to make sure that it does not look blurred or colored spots and so on.
