Frage von migeold:
Hi,
for my HDC-SD300 I would need a wide angle lens, as the Wide Angled Cam is a bit low. Interestingly I find the Raynox HD-6600 Pro with 43mm thread fitting for the action.
The Raynox's synonymous with 52mm (+ additional adapter for 43mm).
I've read somewhere that it would be better because of the vignetting, to take the 52mm, because that would be lower then.
Now I ask myself if someone in the forum already has experience with the Raynox and what the thread for the Panasonic HDC-SD300 (SD200 is synonymous, etc.) s.besten?
From the price here is very little difference. I think it would be unwieldy, to handle the larger 52-WW intent plus adapter ring, but for better picture quality, I would do it.
Else's differences, possibly Brightness?
Thank you for your answers,
Michael.
Antwort von nicecam:
As far as I know there the Raynox for the European market is not with 43mm thread, but it must be adapted. I have such a converter 52 to 43 for my Canon HV-20.
See for example here:
http://www.fotomundus24.de/shop/panasonic-weitwinkel-raynox-hd6600-p-8601.htmlEine Vignettierung beobachte ich bei meiner Camera nicht. Wohl aber with der Gegenlichtblende, die dazu empfohlen wird:
http://www.fotomundus24.de/shop/gegenlichtblende-gummi-weitwinkel-72mm-p-1953.html Even if I push back to the bellows, I have a vignetting. I can not use this Gegenlichblende also.
Antwort von migeold:
Hi John,
I do not know if I should post the link here (surreptitious advertising & Co.), but if I go to the big trading with initial A, mid-and late-M N.de and then the search term "Raynox HD-6600 Pro 43 "text box that I get an entry with a German dealer.
I am glad that you have with the 52-eng no vignetting.
My question is whether with the 43-ger is not synonymous (or see a little) vignetting. As my cam has a 43mm thread, I would actually prefer the 43-ger, because no adapter is necessary.
How are you satisfied with the adapter? Is not it awkward?
Can you find the weight of the WW-intent really annoying?
Sorry, am fairly new, so the generated light protection vignetting?
Regards, Michael.
Antwort von nicecam:
So, now I have extra time at Stillimage called Mundus. In fact, for your Camera Raynox converter with 43 mm and 52 mm connector (sold then with reducer).
Could not understand the staff hardly was too quiet (probably a technical problem)
For my camera was on the staff would make sense my Raynox With reducer.
If I understood him next right, you should try with your camera, with which you manage better terms Converter diffraction blur (In times read in Wikipedia). So go s.besten test in the well-stocked shop and your confidence.
Basically you should only run the converter with short focal. It is stated that he will be zoomed, not just durchzoombar.
A vignetting by the converter should not occur in both models. Just beware before any such lens hood, as I have it on my camera. Alternatives I could not name the employees.
However, remember to clarify the possible problem of vignetting by the camera with you followed Converter s.den mounted PC and look at the picture in the editing software. The display of the camera is working probably with overscan. That is, not the entire picture taken is displayed on the display (keyword TV safe area). On my camera (no problem with the converter, but with the Gegenlichblende) I saw on display in the viewfinder and no shading, but on the PC. The blockage would be synonymous not be seen on a tube TV, but on a projector and possibly on a flat screen TV.
The lens hood produced but not in every case a shadow, but only some screens in some cameras.
Of course, the adapter ring is sometimes a hindrance, because it when unscrewing the converter depending on my mood and sometimes synonymous s.Converter sits or remains on the camera. And if he turns too tight, you get it off sometimes bad.
This is with a reason that the converter remains mostly on the camera. Then zoom not possible.
By the way: a filter, clear glass or UV protection of the lens is part of the use of a converter always
before his lens,
not between Camera and Converter. The more difficult course, in addition to the quick change.
From this you realize already that you need two filters, namely one with and one with 43 mm 72 mm.
By the way, one advantage of the Raynox that he has a front filter thread. The original conversion of Canon for my camera has no front thread.
Synonymous but you can eventually do without the converter, because the Wide Angledeiner Camera still a little worse than mine.
Good, the converter is a bit difficult, of course, and shifted the focus to properly forward. But I can live with.
Maybe your details here still the theoretical and technical experts who can contribute more relating to.
Antwort von AxelM:
I have the Raynox synonymous Converter With the 52-port, and pursuing it on a 43mm adapter on s.einer Panasonic GS-500. That what John has written, I can fully confirm.
The image quality is by outstanding and there is no distortion or color fringing at wide angle range. However, not full durchzoombar eer. In the first half of the zoom range, the picture quality is good, but then after she leaves abruptly. At the upper end is then grottenschlecht.
I have acquired over with a flower-shaped Gegenllichtblende but here it is synonymous to the position in the wide-angle camera lens if synonymous small, vignetting.
All in all, I can recommend the very part.
Axel
Antwort von EdwinAnDerSaar:
Hello!
I also use the Raynox 6600 in the 52mm version s.einer Canon HF100 (37mm filter thread).
Can I connect my speakers only, the picture quality is excellent, I really can not notice any deterioration will be made unless zoomed too far.
There is vignetting when using a step-up adapter from the smaller to the larger filter size s.der Camera thread of the converter anyway.
As a lens hood is recommended in a U.S. forum for the Canon HV20/30/40 Aperture Canon XHA1, which is very accurate fit on the rubber part of the converter. I myself am going to grow soon. Since it is not screwed into the filter thread of the Raynox and protrudes far enough out of view, there is no vignetting synonymous here. Moreover looks pretty good ;-)
Greeting
Eddi
Antwort von fly-italo:
I'm curious, tomorrow is my Raynox 6600 58mm with 46mm step up adapter on Panasonic HDC-SD77. This was always CAM
58mm recommended, although many would even 52mm.
As a lens hood, I just here the times ordered. That's only once a good impression, if not simply goes back.
http://cgi.ebay.de/Weitwinkel-Gegenlichtblende-Sonnenblende-Lens-Hood-72mm-/370374526012?cmd=ViewItem&pt=DE_Elektronik_Computer_Foto_Camcorder_Foto_Camcorderzubeh% C3% B6r_PM & hash = item563c0ac43c
Antwort von nicecam:
I have acquired over with a flower-shaped Gegenllichtblende but here it is synonymous to the position in the wide-angle camera lens if synonymous small, vignetting. What is a tulip? Stillimage Mundus is something I believe synonymous in the program. But the camera has not even bayonet. You can, yes draufdrehen only. I'd say amateurish: the "tulip leaves" must be yes above. Why are there still vignetting? Bottom left, bottom right, etc.?
As a lens hood is recommended in a U.S. forum for the Canon HV20/30/40 Aperture Canon XHA1, which is very accurate fit on the rubber part of the converter. I myself am going to grow soon. Since it is not screwed into the filter thread of the Raynox and protrudes far enough out of view, there is no vignetting synonymous here. Moreover looks pretty good ;-) @ EdwinAnDerSaar:
Exactly what I've tried s.meiner Canon HV-20 recently, because I'm so synonymous, the XH-A1.
We had also
recently
When used in Africa, I had my HV-20, the hood of the XH-A1 scheduled to. But was not used, despite double-sided tape. I was there (in the slums of Freetown, where very closely approaching it, too dangerous or too fiddly). With scenic shooting may go about it.
The aperture of the XH-A1 fits the way, only with "hanging and choking on the rubber part of the converter. Vorgeschraubtem better is the fit with clear glass or UV filter. Of these, however, he slips from you. Tape and must therefore be worked with.
Ifs is tight as in the slums and children on a zustürmen could, this construction to be unstable.
