Frage von wenzel chris:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von mcbob3:
Wenzel @ chris: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Well first you have to buy such a thing and then I would like to buy the right ... ;-) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e has nothing to do with putrefaction!
Antwort von philbird:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von wenzel chris:
to get the correct answer to question one must ask the right
Antwort von philbird:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von wenzel chris:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von philbird:
\u003cdiv class=\wrote: \u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von wenzel chris:
\u003cdiv class=\only wrong answer to give: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cdiv class=\Glidecam is a hindrance for these kind of videos :) really really \u003cbr /\u003e You go to film times and feet ACTA defend that better suits your little world. \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Ideally would like to answer all the typical user dslr .... light-strong lens, aperture on .. then that's great cinema :-) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e yes ... a bright lens, aperture open (what else a bright objectively synonymous) would be wrong in this case not only hinder but completely ... \u003cbr /\u003e First, focus the koenntest taenzer never ... secondly everything would be bright .. \u003cbr /\u003e exemption can be synonymous make targeted by light occurred, does not always just about tiefenschaerfe \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e and respect aside ... do realize you have nothing in your life what would be created schuetzenswert, otherwise maybe would otherwise
 |
Antwort von philbird:
\u003cdiv class=\! do \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e that's just Chris, the only fuesse \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e and you can only give wrong answer: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cdiv class=\completely wrong answer given \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Since haste of course right. Lenses and Lichstarke Glidecam are cumbersome for this kind of videos :) really really \u003cbr /\u003e You go to film times and feet ACTA defend that better suits your little world. \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Ideally would like to answer all the typical user dslr .... light-strong lens, aperture on .. then that's great cinema :-) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e yes ... a bright lens, aperture open (what else a bright objectively synonymous) would be wrong in this case not only hinder but completely ... \u003cbr /\u003e First, focus the koenntest taenzer never ... secondly everything would be bright .. \u003cbr /\u003e exemption can be synonymous make targeted by light occurred, does not always just about tiefenschaerfe \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e and respect aside ... do realize you have in yourstill alive nothing that would be created schuetzenswert, otherwise maybe would think differently \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e A fast Objectively beduetet not mean that the aperture must be torn ... But it just once or twice when it dims synonymous really sharp. But that fits against time to you - however, talk to each price. \u003cbr /\u003e In addition to these projects are classic HDSLR projects. Whatever. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e And ACTA - I've already created quite a few things that have been copied and copied again - was shit and has had sales declines en mass. \u003cbr /\u003e As ACTA but lead to much worse things would, as declines in sales to have, I give the cup next a.dich. \u003cbr /\u003e You are the uninformed / rotzdumme / unkritsche completely synonymous or conservative stock only. Only the
|
|
