Frage von hubse:
Hello,
Today, each of HD and you get a good camcorder speaks only in HD. If I convert to a Materila HD-DVD, the picture quality looks to me logically () in worse shape than when mans immediately receives it in PAL, in youtube you can adjust everything in HD - which brings little in the windows at all what? Incorporate it actually makes sense in a video in HD?
Suppose you want to create a video that for DVD, youtube, and synonymous suitable for presentations via a beamer should be, you take better in HD or Pal? What are the pros and cons, synonymous for cutting (except that you buy at HD synonymous equal nen new computer can)?
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Hi
So it always takes the best quality and then can be expected to down. If one looks at the true HD PAL (SD) course runterskaliert better absorbed than directly as SD.
Youtube now accepts all s.and scales the internal format of the output to various formats.
Youtube for his s.besten create as mp4 files.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von nicecam:
And one should add that here in the forum, the experts unanimously probably think that it
is no longer possible today capturet when the camera capturing the Downkonvert leaves, but in HD, the HD material such as synonymous and only cut the very end when Rausrendern on PAL runterrechnet.
If I convert to a Materila HD-DVD, the picture quality looks to me (quite logical) in worse shape than when mans receives the same in PAL ...
... except that you can buy at HD synonymous equal nen new computer ... Why "obviously"? And if your calculator is not very old, then he gets along synonymous with HD (V) material. For AVC (HD) that can of course be different.
Antwort von tommyb:
Depending of scaling algorithm may look like HD to SD DOWNCONVERT fairly well.
AviSynth is the solution.
