Frage von armin72:
Hello,
I would like komprimeieren a video with Xvid. The video is in 16:9 format.
Now I've tried different resolutions, but none has really worked. The first thing I tried 352x198. On the PC that is properly presented on the SAP is the picture, but apart unfortunately. Next, I tried dranzukleben black bars above and below. Since I have the visual picture back on the entire image at 352x198 and 352x288.
zum Bild On the PC, it looks good again, at the SAP is the picture this time, slightly compressed. Can the reason be that not at 4:3 corresponds to 352x288. Should I take more as 352x264 or 384x288? 352x288 would be even half PAL resolution. In Xvid I could just fix the aspect ratio, but there is an indication that this will be ignored in an avi container.
How do I set the Resolutionhier one s.sinnvollsten so that the SAP is the true picture?
Gruss,
Armin.
Antwort von jeantier:
Sorry, what is SAP?
to think otherwise and convert 16:9 anamorphic one PixelAspect ratio of 1441 to 1 has
Antwort von steveb:
Superallesplayer?
poor analog playstation?
Single on doll?
I know it is not yet synonymous ....
Antwort von jeantier:
Gröhl,
Ind S
A ll
P lanlos
what?
Antwort von Armin72:
sorry, SAP =
S tand
A llons
P layer. So is a DVD player is connected to the s.einem Television.
The acronym I have now been viewed more times and they unfortunately become accustomed to me ;-)
Antwort von jeantier:
So as the video output. Now I know XVid as well as non-existent, but see times in the Prefs somewhere if there was an anamorphic aspect ratio is given ... with most encoders, there's at doing this,
Otherwise, Sorry, I then put an x to some u
And give up
Antwort von Markus:
sorry, SAP = S tand A llons P layer. So is a DVD player is connected to the s.einem Television. SAP? - Now I finally know what to do all day in the office watching DVD! ;-)
Antwort von jeantier:
Gröhl,
but help the poor fellow at last, though I soon may no longer synonymous with laughter ... SAP is really flexible and really inaccurate interpretation of one brüller s.Möglichkeiten ..
Thanks and sorry Armin
And once again cheers and Mark steveb
Antwort von Markus:
The first thing I tried 352x198. On the PC that is properly presented on the SAP is the picture, but apart unfortunately. Hello Armin,
Your television has a 16:9, 4:3-switch? You will find that either directly as a button on the remote control, or possibly in the menu. That you can look in the manual.
The first selected resolution (352 × 198) in any case corresponds exactly to a ratio of 16:9 and should be correctly displayed in the 16:9 mode of the TV.
See synonymous:
16:9 Recording with DVCPro, transferred to MiniDV is stretched 4:3 (comes to you, the best known picture in this post?)
Next, I tried dranzukleben black bars above and below. Since I have the visual picture back on the entire image at 352x198 and 352x288. The aspect ratio of 352 × 288 corresponds 16:13,1. A 4:3-Picture, however, would correspond to 16:12. No wonder then that the video looks like on the television breitgezogen something. ;-)
Should I take more as 352x264 or 384x288? Both 352 × 264 as synonymous 384 × 288 correspond to exactly one 4:3-ratio. I would begin by the former Resolutionausprobieren, because you do not have to scale the template.
Antwort von Armin72:
Thanks for the hints. The Xvid codec setting the aspect ratio is not permitted, however, guarantee that it works.
zum Bild If any event, an indication that the container formats on the aspect ratio does not read every SAP ;-).
Antwort von Markus:
Yes ... and?
Antwort von jeantier:
Take dat square out yet ...
select the video version, which
You need
there would need to go yet
Practice makes perfect roteinmarkiertefremdsprachigewennaucheinschüchterneunddochunnützewarhnhinweise
Antwort von Armin72:
The aspect ratio is ignored. I've tested with media player classic and winamp with. The work actually seems to avi not. But I next experiment a bit.
Gruß,
Armin.
Antwort von Markus:
The aspect ratio is ignored. In this case, everything's all clear. Details as above. ;-)
Antwort von Armin72:
Yes, exactly - thanks for the tips :-)
Gruß,
Armin.
