Frage von snuby:
After I learned that my camera (Panasonic NV GS11) for 160 ¬ needs to be repaired, I imagine the question whether it's still worthwhile!
I am now on three camcorder encountered:
1) Canon MD150
2) Panasonic GS 80 of the EC
3) SonyDCR HC 45
Since I am a higher Resolutionwollte (> 800 Kpix) times I have the Canon camcorder viewed. It is, I noticed that many of the sounds on the tape drive complain! Is this really so or we are talking here of "whining at high levels?
Actually, the aforementioned Panasonic me better, but this has "only" 800 Kpix. On a flat screen Yet this resolution is not quite as doll or I see this wrong?
Can someone help me what camcorder with what resolution I should take? That would be escht suuuper because you yes but the sellers are more or less is delivered!
PS: I have a purchase limit presented about 450 ¬ (or is that with my wishes are not fulfilled?)
Thank you very much
snuby
Antwort von JMitch:
1. 720x576 is PAL TV
2. HDV is 1440x1080 for HDTV up to 1920x1080
For 450 ¬ you will be at 1 must remain as still emerge for subsequent editing program, possibly increasing the PC and HDTV if you are of an HDV camcorder from recordings.
Antwort von snuby:
Thank you for the quick reply.
But what exactly does it mean now? (unfortunately I know with the matter not so doll out!).
snuby
Antwort von Markus73:
Thank you for the quick reply.
But what exactly does it mean now? That there is no preference, how many pixels the camera has, as always with just the usual PAL Resolutionaufgezeichnet will.
Ok, more accurately, there are differences in the actual optical resolution (eg, depending on whether 1 or 3 CCDs are available), but on the theory of just over 400,000 pixels PAL standards are you never.
Gruß,
Markus
Antwort von snuby:
Hello Markus73,
ie if I now have a camcorder with 800kpix suppose, I would flat-screen TV s.meine no great difference to a camcorder with 1070 Kpix see?
snuby
Antwort von PowerMac:
All PAL cameras regardless of internal-megapixel save as 720x576. This is on a Flaschbildschirm almost always look like shit. The only question is how shit. With a good PAL Camera is obviously from the picture better than with a poor.
Antwort von JMitch:
Of the 800,000 pixel will only hold ~ 400.000 exploited. The rest goes out for image stabilization and / or (bad) photographs (frames) to make.
Other way around, no preference, the number more than 400,000 pixels, the camera has PAL, PAL is only a fixed number of pixels used, these ~ 400,000 (720x576 = 414,720).
PAL has an aspect ratio of 4:3 and 16:9 so that the flat screen of course, right and left edge of a black mourning.
Find people in the forums, one of the cameras have to ask what the think and read tests.
And do not listen to Power, in 'its Igegami appears in the garnix :-)
Antwort von Udo Schröer:
Have you not already have a Panasonic, like you buy a new 3CCD chip s.besten me, because this is visibly better than yours. Even with 400000 pixels
Antwort von Aljoscha.Niko:
Aha, interesting. So good is nothing when you turn off the IS, so that all pixel 800k theoretically be used? Because if you have ~ 400k pixel and the rest of the IS, then so should the building with IS turned off all pixel 800k available (ie, actually a better resolution), but are not used for PAL, or?
Thanks for answer: Aljoscha.
MfG
Antwort von PowerMac:
No one knows what the internal electronics of the camera with the additional pixels is made. Some cameras have only 400,000 active and 800,000 others are calculated from a 400,000-Picture.
