Newsmeldung von slashCAM:Test: Test: Canon PowerShot SX1 IS (; video mode) of heidi - 28 May 2009 22:29:00 > This season is marked by the (; prosumer) cameras who want to make the competing HD camcorders. For them, their relatively large sensors and the generally better optics (speaking, of course, especially with DSLRs), but not so successful from the perspective of handling the most videographers. The Canon PowerShot SX1 IS, a super zoom-lens camera with permanently installed, is no exception ...
full article
Antwort von Interlaced_Killer:
Good :-) only tested with the color fidelity I can not understand. The brown sweater of my juniors was orange, had no preference which setting I selected. In particular, when light and dark collide (; room with sun's rays) showed the most unusual color effects.
Lowlight: This one has a room at noon on cloudy days. Especially black areas are of "snow" covered.
The noise: possible causal factor is the duration of the ultrasonic motor noise, which lies near the Microphones and is always listening to the audible.
Antwort von vidoc:
My subjective experience after some small recording sessions with the SX1:
At least my hands are not capable of a one-handed operation in video mode. Especially s.den record button I get up without thumb cramp. (; This is supposed to be at the upcoming Panasonic GH1 much better.) Squeak When I copy and klackt the Zoommechanismus normal. This is clearly audible in the audio recording. The micro-images are blown in the wind outdoors, despite all filters "have been". True wind is obviously not feasible.
Eneloop Batteries with 12 per session, I am well arrived in time but not the battery life is actually very high. The battery change is not possible without removal from the tripod head.
The color is (in daylight, ie on location) is really attractive, the Low Light (skills, ie) for many Innenaufnahmesituationen are gruesome. The distortion in the WW division, I was synonymous with some shots in practice, clearly uncomfortable.
Play the mov files in media player classic proceeded despite Core 2 Quad Q9400 seldom smoothly. At direct cutting in Premiere CS4 is on my PC not to think.
Antwort von Büschel:
Well, I do not synonymous understand why it is essential now Canon's CMOS sensor to Top Model and had to put the CCD in the "castrated". Since then we bought a camera so synonymous because of the photos, cut off because of the CCD even better. Eh do not know what more recently for the CMOS to be that great, but sells the advertising industry which is now so great as what new, where the rubbish is. CCD still has advantages.
I used the S5 IS with CCD, which was indeed only VGA, but the videos were great. And AVI. Why then MOV?
Antwort von Jan:
The CMOS stop allows faster reading, you can stop by the SX (1 to 4 frames / sec until card is full, when card fast enough to make) and just this HD video, 10 as the little sister SX
During a brief Comparison on my part, I found the SX 1 Stillimage even a bit better, but I made no laboratory tests, but only a 1 and one SX SX 10 Stillimage juxtaposed with ISO 400. The differences were not significant, however. No clue what they have said the well-known magazines ...
CMOS's just much cheaper to produce, which is synonymous is an important reason for the firms where CMOS chips have been installed only in Webcams (the time, because they were much worse) - are over. A CMOS can be even better depending on the model (; Comparison eg older Pana 3 CCD to the new SD 300 with (and C) MOS.
VG
January
Antwort von Jan:
@ Slashcam - maybe spins times with you, the Canon SX 200 IS (as a direct competitor to the Panasonic TZ 7 - which was already tested here synonymous -) one, the Canon is not a stereo microphone and no optical zoom during filming, but some Photo magazines confirm their very good noise performance is recorded and synonymous with 1280x720, 30 p.
When customer demand and sales, the TZ 7 and the SX 200 are currently high in the course, more than some bridge cameras ala SX 1 & 10
VG
January
Antwort von Konzertinchen:
I have the SX1 at a rock concert struggled. The sound is distorted in the recording was terrible. There are smaller cameras, such as the SonyDSC H10 (, although synonymous mono), a thousand times better in terms of sound at rock concerts. I stood with my little camera is often not much of a distortion from Wummerbox and there was nothing. On the contrary, people on youtube wrote asking me s.and after the camera. The only problem is that it is mono, the picture quality ok but not optimal, and especially you can not zoom during filming, which is at a concert a great disappointment.
In contrast, the SX1 is beyond not only the bass from the Micro, but even with the vocals you hear distortion. I'm super disappointed and annoyed by now synonymous. I was testing of a rap video - seen concert on youtube (; however, with his little sister SX10), stopped over where the bass clearly. The SonyHX1 I had (because of exactly the same problem, and others) have already exchanged.
Are there remedies? I had the Micro but made synonymous to "Auto". Will it help you what, next time it is set to "Manual" and then very quietly? Has someone there with experience of the action at concerts? An external Micro does seem to be synonymous not be connected. Or is there a way to dampen the sound somewhat, by (; imagination ...) cotton wool or foam, etc. affixes on the mics? But this will certainly take out the highs synonymous ...
So I am super happy so far with the camera, the zoom is great, the picture quality is far better than the oh-how acclaimed SonyHX1. Image noise was marginal, at least when it is cloudy in the evening) and falls in small format no longer - if not for the "Pixelpeepen" tendency. The auto focus, for example (in sport mode, used during the concert) was super fast and I had a lot less waste than with the HX1. However, the images become somewhat reddish (; can s.den lights are synonymous), but did well to correct. Therefore I would like to keep the cam, but the audio did not make me completely happy. Because someone knows a hint?
LG
K.
