as the canopus nx wants releasing original as PCI Express, the map is interesting for us.
where it is different because there konkerete to the DVX, which canopusseite not nich so informative / clear.
If the picture / sound quality better? MPEG2 hardware support?
it stands as of directional recording. sowas it should have been synonymous with the Storm2. mean, I can work in parallel on the NX and via normal FW a DV stream via canopus codec card or record accommodate from 2 streams?
can anyone enlighten me there.
thank you in advance.
Antwort von WeiZen:
Moin, Primary erstmal a ticket for support HDV, DV, of course, synonymous, or all mixed up. As the Storm only synonymous for HD / HDV. No hardware MPEG module, software encoders are now better and faster. The latter is synonymous here, together with the expression Procoder Edius editing software. Correctly if there is another s.Board Firewire port or sound card or other available PCI slot, then synonymous of multiple DV cameras simultaneously, as with the Storm. The card is reported as an internal ADVC controller, if I may say so casually, so it can use any program that supports PHCI cards, at least in the training and inputs. Plugin for Adobe available. Better than DVX? An entirely different league, since it was designed for HDV support. Carries a super scale hardware on board, the scaled perfectly DV to HDV.
Antwort von Michael-O:
Hello Ulrich, Thanks for your reply.
So if I understand correctly now, except that I can handle full HDV (wanting to buy one vllt FX1) is the board of the power better than the DVX.
the NX HDV itself can not absorb, but I need ne normal FW card?
sache coupling to dr: 1 option: Cut and add in parallel over the normal 1394 card? 2. option: Of NX takes on a digital camera, 1394 of taking on another camera?
can only start with the 193 HDV?
at the moment have 2 1394 cards in it, because I very often work on firewire disks, important for me. this makes no problems?
mr would grow then perhaps the PCIe version of the map.
Antwort von Michael-O:
I've never forgotten:
would be upgraded to:
Asus PCIe board Pentium D 3 GHz 1 GB of RAM ATI X800
bye
Antwort von WeiZen:
Moin, no, no, no. The course can EdiusNX solo record in HDV, of a camera. In the transport stream, the format is what is stored on the tape, while capturing, as of DV used to be separated into scenes. At the same time on the fly is a conversion to the Canopus HQ codec, an MPEG file in AVI container to achieve best possible performance. With the DV format, then the capturing of multiple DV Cams possible if other IEEE ports are available. While it is true, which is PCI Express version, the 64 bit version is still a little bit better performance. 3Ghz is too little, from the Board would not I take. There are of Super Micro DAC, the PDSGE for single core CPU, Intel HT and SATA RAID. That's enough for 3 HDV streams in real time. Besides, very low www.dvpoint.de makes you an offer. I did it with 4 SATA and an IDE 250GB as the system partition and am very happy with it. There were / are at present a doctoral Canopus, where the expansion card for HDV output included on the RT component.
Antwort von Michael-O:
aha thanks for the clarification
ie, the card picks up the FW card and converts the format to capture to DV.
the main thing is that the system operate in parallel abkackt niht, so film premiere pro cut and add something else in parallel. because at the moment the system is tight, if I was doing with Scenalyzer. have no lust for dropouts and re-import.
I wanted to get a Pentium D DUAL CORE, not a pure single.
HDV is generally synonymous in the next year, no topic for us, as is the demand from customers not there, I just want to have the option to make it but at times can make.
have the supermicro seen, unfortunately, synonymous entpsrechend expensive ¬ 300. good board of asus costs 140 ¬. asus have at the moment to DV Raptor, no problems.
Antwort von Michael-O:
then come to pure expenditure with the card in Adobe PAck 1500 ¬ + 800 ¬ hardware with Supermicro for 200 ¬.
This is much condemned at once :-(
Antwort von Jörg:
Hi, And I would myself as Adobe Premiere users very significant Thinking about making that my investment in Canopus NX or DVX Card is at all meaningful. The issue here should be s.Canopus asked how long the support of Adobeprodukten or support from Adobe s.Drittanbieter can be ensured.
Gruß Jörg
Antwort von Michael-O:
Hello Jörg,
This vexing question, we have already made synonymous.
The dealer said that adobe for Canopus is a dying branch and it only counts for Edius.
For many, the problem is certainly that much for them based on Premiere and colleagues use it.
as synonymous with us unfortunately the case. Cross is working with other FireWire disks impossible when using all the different apps.
but they can afford not to canopus manufactures like to adobe?
bye
Antwort von wrunge:
"Michael O" wrote:
but they can afford not to canopus manufactures like to adobe?
bye
And if it completely the other way around would be ...??? The difficulties with the SDK yet of Canopus Premiere admitted quite candidly about different color space, etc. The fact that Adobe is not pleased about Edius, synonymous is evident. Since we still like to block views. Questions in the direction of further support of Canopus will be very, very well, let's say, or not at all reluctant to answer. The choice of hardware-cut is reconsidered certainly very good. However, if you can live with Edius, has at the moment, at least with HD, one step ahead. I would regret the end of cooperation with the Storm, it would be an end but in any case. Gruß Jörg
Antwort von wolfgang:
Edius is the better - probably yes. Edius and has quite caught up, that one must adhere envy. Eidus 4 should go more towards compositing skills as they listen. But the software's just seems more and more adapted s.The hardware, and that goes a halt with its own software better than with AP.
And for HDV editing is already Edius as a pure software solution, simply good - see, eg, only the very good skills in capturing, Automatic scene separation, automatic conversion equal to the capturing of the intermediate files, which are then in the very good Canopus HQ available codec.
Since you are still merely observing what some editing programs.
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
So I now go even two tracks (P-Pro, Edius Pro 3 with Storm2). But may well be that I am so soft of a disconnect to 2007th Schaun'mer times, then who has the better offer ...
Antwort von WeiZen:
"Anonymous" wrote:
The difficulties with the SDK yet of Canopus Premiere admitted quite candidly about different color space, etc. The fact that Adobe is not pleased about Edius, synonymous is evident. Since we still like to block views. Questions in the direction of further support of Canopus will be very, very well, let's say, or not at all reluctant to answer.
Moin, since my run in the Canopus forum were not wiedersprochen the contrary, the buck is probably ore from Adobe. A third can only hinzuprogrammieren this at a software which is provided in the SDK. More is not. Changes then this SDK version to version of making the third for the matter is not simple. Imagine the SDK before a bunch of keys, so just leave the doors open for the key match, all others remain. Are then replaced the locks, nothing works. An SDK should be downwards compatible, probably not true at Adobe. The biggest challenge for third parties. An example of another software: With the SDK for Ulead Media Studio Pro can program a third party filter. Everything you need for this is provided. Not sure what you need. To apply the name is part of the clip to which the filter should be. It is not required. Thus, the SDK offers no possibilities such as a filter to create the Datt / Timestamp indicating the DV files. Minimum prerequisite would be the clip names.
Antwort von Wiro:
Well, as always synonymous. It is clear that APPRO Users future, put less and less able to build on Canopus support. My dealer has since been somewhat evasive answers when I asked him cringe-inducing. Since then came such responses as "why not simply get on Edius?" . . .
The company are looking Matrox wirds. Who have the hacks at the SDK, of course, synonymous with their products noticed and is now a model set to Adobe support. I'm assuming that will potter on Appro-cut squares in future, more and more the RT.X100 Matrox Xtreme Pro. Gaze mer mal. Greeting Wiro
