Frage von manOman:
Hello I would like to know what you can recommend me?
rode videomic or t.bone?
Sound is mostly fished!
Antwort von prem:
have t.bone and'm from thomann-service and the price / lesitungsverhältnis absolutely satisfied. thomann when you can buy, test and within 30 days of exchange. a very great service!
+ end +
Antwort von mastaTraxx:
As a recording magazine once wrote:
The t-bone is expected to price its really not that sound good ...
I'm with my t-bone (SCT-700) very satisfied.
Greeting
Dave
Antwort von Marco:
"The t-bone is expected to price its really not that sound good ..." These surprisingly positive experience I have with just the t.bone ME9600 made.
Marco
Antwort von digitalCat:
I've ever been in a test rode the Me66 and the one I wanted .. so I rode the synonymous actually buy, but now it confuses me.
There is somewhere on the internet en test video by em9600?
'm about other opinions on the comparative tense.
Antwort von digitalCat:
What kind of camcorder did you ever?
Antwort von digitalCat:
panasonic nv gs 250 and Canon MVX 20I, both with 3.5 mm jack input
Antwort von magic-lighting:
Myself 2 pieces of EM9600 thomann. In normal operation, it is very useful in telephoto mode when it roars battery power supply is already quite clear. If I s.Tonmischer by Phantonspeisung it's already running better. For the price of 59 euros, it is fairly decent, but one should not expect miracles - with Sennheiser byerdynamic or it can obviously not keep up. Really good mics cost nunmal more precisely (see Byerdynamic MCE72 or MCE86).
Whether it's for your own Bedraf enough, you can easily find out by looking at it just in a micro Thomann ordered. Since you 30 days right of return and has the whole versandkostenfrei (out and back) is done, it is absolutely no risk.
When the Micro, incidentally, on top of the Camorder to be mounted, the EM9600 for consumer camcorders actually too big (it is just a shotgun). Also transferred to the drive noise. If the sound but to be fished, the dimensions are indeed no preference.
Antwort von Marco:
"With Sennheiser byerdynamic or it can obviously not keep up." I think this can not be a flat rate. I've just last week the ME9600 increased after I years as a guide only micro Sennheiser MKE-300 was used. In the sound spectrum is the Sennheiser t.bone this in any case superior. The MKE-300 cuts inaudible bass and treble. The sound of ME9600 is much more balanced. In the noise and give the two take nothing. From the processing times apart (t.bone aluminum, plastic Sennheiser). T.bone When I have the choice, it is internal or via phantom power to operate.
In this case, I find the t.bone better than the Sennheiser, though it costs only one third. But how in the t.bone Comparison of similar, low-Rode Microphones perspective would be, I do not know.
Marco
Antwort von magic-lighting:
That with the Sennheiser Micro surprised me a little while now, but can not resist talking synonymous, because I do not know MKE 300. Do it to me just at Thomann views and must say that the purely optical Senheiser already not very good looks (plastic look).
Garnicht knew that in this price-/Qualitätsklasse Sennheiser offers what - thought would be the only (semi-) professional field. With the phrase
"with or byerdynamic Sennheiser course it can not keep up" I had actually synonymous professional microphones and meant the subject again but priced much higher. No matter - we simply Sennheiser; s.byerdynamic (MCE86), the EM9600 is still not ran.
On a Comparison between t.bone and Rode synonymous but I would be interested.
Antwort von poluroud20:
So I'll have me here hwie explains rode to the christmas wish
Antwort von Frank B.:
"With Sennheiser byerdynamic or it can obviously not keep up."
I think this can not be a flat rate. I've just last week the ME9600 increased after I years as a guide only micro Sennheiser MKE-300 was used. In the sound spectrum is the Sennheiser t.bone this in any case superior.
Marco I have also the above mentioned mics in use and I had the opposite view. Sennheiser MKE 300 and Thomann ME9600 are mono with greater directivity. The Sennheiser has a very good quality, that cost significantly more synonymous. The Thomann mE falls in the quality compared to something from Sennheiser, but by its effect metal casing is solid and somewhat uncritical use of the hand, for example reports. The Sennheiser is very short and it can not be nearly silent in the hand. Even on the camcorder, it is not critical, since, at least for my camcorder, the drive and keyboard sounds with records. Therefore I made a piece of plastic pipe and a couple of rubber rings hanging a microphone / - decoupling built.
Also, I use of stereo microphones Beyerdynamic and Sony.
The stereo microphones of SonyECM - MS957 and Beyerdynamic MCE-72 CAM are sounding even better, with its range is largely another.
Gruß Frank
Antwort von Marco:
I do not want too much out rumreiten. I had the MKE-300 Comparison of the ME-9600 with a frequency response of 20 to 25,000 Hz the linear test measured.
The MKE is shown in a 5 dB higher average level.
The MKE emphasizes the bass range of approximately 250 to 400 heart with approximately +6 dB and the range of approximately 6-11 kHz with +6 to +9 dB.
The ME-9600 highlights the same bass with approximately +5 dB, is also very linear.
The MKE falls p.14 kHz to 18 kHz by 20 dB between 250 Hz to 100 Hz as much as 25 dB.
The ME-9600 falls p.14 kHz to 18 kHz to 15 dB between 250 to 100 Hz by only 10 dB.
At 60 Hz the MKE is already 40 dB below the average level. The ME-9600 only 25 dB lower.
This test confirmed my subjective listening test. The Sennheiser MKE-300 is compared with the t.Bone ME-9600 something schwachbrüstig in the bass range, less linear and not quite as transparent in the high tones, but a bit too "sharp" in the frequency range of the sibilants. A second MKE-300 behaved well.
Marco
Antwort von Frank B. als Gast:
Hi Marco,
so if you've researched exactly, can you and I will not oppose synonymous. My personal hearing was just different, that may be something with the circumcision of you described the bass at Sennheiser to do. My impression was that the Sennheiser sound sources in about 5 meters away (there is a directional micro) accurate and noise-free einfing. For short distances, I would always above the microphone of Sony Or Beyerdynamic use.
Frank
