Even when I use the 3D hype rather than temporary, as a real breakthrough of the technology see: The same arguments were there at that time in the transition from black and white film to color: "Not necessary, too expensive, too little Phantasieanregend ..."
Antwort von pilskopf:
The technology development is not before stopping and good films are undoubtedly synonymous in 20 years rotated in 2D, which needs a Arthausfilm synonymous 3D? The viewers know of the films as well as the producers and directors. Mainstream films have hardly before the actual good films represent for which there may be a Wurscht as broadcast but Lars Of Trier film is in 3D Sun daft as a Emmereich film in black and white, mono and in SD resolution.
Antwort von deti:
Avatar has been my first and only film in 3D. And I would not watch a fantasy film, still put on a pair of glasses. Somehow it has really paid off but I do not know a CG film, which with so much love to detail was made. The nature of the virtual camera is awesome and the motion capture work is synonymous implemented fascinating. Whether this has something to do with 3D? No, of course not. It is the realization that a film has qualities must be before a value is created by 3D. I do not become ill, nor was the low brightness of a problem. Only the cheap anti-reflective polarizer glasses was bad and I had always reflections of the viewer window of the back of the field of view. Strictly speaking, the 3D effect in Avatar is quite small, since the action mostly takes place there, where the two images are identical. Thus, the strong 3-looking parts of the image (ie the s.meisten staggered image content) to perform only in the area. Support was at the focal plane of the virtual avatar Camera synonymous implemented well, so that the strong-looking 3D image parts synonymous always run into the same blur. This corresponds to the natural picture impression and prevent headaches, I feel synonymous with irritation. Since a lot of know-how is in the game, so really with the available 3D technology looks good. I do not think that any future 3D film will be automatically implemented equally well. To that extent could a few badly made films where neither content nor technology are high quality, end the 3D hype synonymous again.
Deti
Antwort von Axel:
"Deti" wrote:
Strictly speaking, the 3D effect in Avatar is quite small, since the action mostly takes place there, where the two images are identical. Thus, the strong 3-looking parts of the image (ie the s.meisten staggered image content) to perform only in the area.
As I already wrote several times: The best effect is a subtle, which is used similar to surround sound. The fact that the background (what you seem to be with Shallow-DoF just blurrt) far, everything looks deep and pulls out a stronger spell than a 2D Picture.
"Deti" wrote:
To that extent could a few badly made films where neither content nor technology are high quality, end the 3D hype synonymous again.
That would be disastrous for the industry: Even before Harry Potter in the fall with an expected increase in insider s.3D cinema to the same extent as he has done since Avatar-Start. Thus, with the shareholders, they always give a vote of confidence on exponential growth (what's observed in nature such as the multiplication of tubercle from open-TB), the really clever gamers to go out before the bubble bursts, the savers pay Mine.
Antwort von Zizi:
I give the rating only in the very last point .. The rest I find nonsense. I would like terminator2 movies, Matrix or James Ryan in 3D like in the movies .. Geshen the films would be worse off by the no bit .. Wow, only the effect in this movie would be better! Even if avatar is dancing just a "cheap" Story mixture of Lord of the rings, Smurfs and "the with the Wolf" is on Feeling horny Movies 300m ² of my Meinug wars still synonymous if not necessarily good for a movie needs.
Antwort von ArnAuge:
When I read a good, gripping novel that I experience in my mind's eye even DEN in 3D - and with surround sound anyway ;-)
Avatar was synonymous my first 3D film on the one hand and it was quite nice, but I've taken more time in between the glasses and was very excited of the beautiful colors and images - just stop everything, "blurred" by the double images. So did the rest of the film seen bathed in dreary darkness.
Now the normal 2D DVD version is on the table and I'm looking forward to it!
3D may be good for football and instructions for use. Otherwise I do not need it!
Greetings Arno
PS: If it's views without glasses and does not lower the overall picture is this, then I care even synonymous for TV!
Antwort von lofi:
.. and single non-buy?
Clearly it is cheaper for the Manufacturer, to double the frame rate and the then selling it as new instead of meaningful THE HYPE Technology (OLED making) for production. But perhaps LCD production lines have not paid off, or you can with 3D rausholen more Money? That's the point in the entertainment industry. GELDRAUSHOLEN! GELDRAUSHOLEN! and then: NOCHMEHRGELDRAUSHOLEN!
Whether it works remains to be seen. Whether the consumer is stupid or not.
The first step is just hard - in a few (OK a few more) years, 3D standard.
Antwort von Axel:
"Tomita" wrote:
Calls stage show! Calls live orchestra!
And I must think s.den plan, cinemas in the future more and more to develop wholesale and synonymous Live Event: World Cup transmission in 3D, live concerts via satellite exclusively for cinema. Selected operas from major opera houses of the hard drive. When asked where the corresponding flyer with the slogan Digital is better! Could still interpret: someone said in the Opera foyer!
The first sound films were really "nerve-racking." Both in terms of sound quality as synonymous because of the neglect of the picture were shown at first mainly talking heads. Because the first sound films mediated almost all the important information on dialogs, they were very unfilmisch and were of Stummfilmnostalgikern derisively called "talkies". Even today, one must admit that the last great silent films were about 100 times better than the first sound films. Similarly, one will judge in some years to come-hell-out dreidimensionalisierte Popcornkotze. Or?
Antwort von nicecam:
"Pilskopf" wrote:
... But one of Lars Trier film Sun in 3D as a stupid Emmereich film in black and white, mono and in SD resolution.
Quite aptly, I think.
Antwort von Mantas:
why so many people want football in 3d? Most of the time is still before the setting Of the top, there is no 3d ...
