Frage von Blade:
Hello dear forum!
I am looking for an HD camcorder. I attach importance, as amateurs, especially in lowlight good qualities.
I now have a look at some camcorders, Canon's thrown only on (; why I open up my thread so here). Choice to stand for me:
HG21
S100 RF
HF S11
HF 200
Otherwise, my focus is on no other camera in question. Who wants to ask, why that, and this model is not an option for me may like to ask for any other I've more or less good reason for buying this camera I can not imagine!
My budget is at a maximum of 1000 ¬. My favorites are so far the HG21 and the RF S200 (; because I do not think that its predecessor, the S100 RF is better). Now for my questions:
1. Is it worth the extra 300 euros for the HF S200 of the HG21? I mean only in terms of image quality. Unfortunately there is no test and no comparison images have to slashcam / camcorders-test, but the HF S11 as far as I know much better in lowlight than the truncated HG21 (and I'm not there-seen images on camcorder test?).
2. Now time ne more general question: I have done extensive work in recent months with HD camcorders in this price range. But I find it always difficult for me to decide, synonymous because the next better camera only costs 150 euros more and in return provides a slightly sharper picture (;) just an example. Are the Prices and the camcorder actually consistently modulated in such a way that one only needs to invest some money to get a slightly better cam to, or is there somewhere on the long line of the price spectrum, several degrees, which is a clear distinction between "amateur film" and "semi-professional cameras can speak?" Should I still save some to buy me for double the money a camera in a new segment?
I hope the last question was somewhat understandable, but I am synonymous happy if someone with weiterhilft the first question!
mfG Blade
Antwort von Blade:
Okay then, I ask different times:
The principle is for me (I have a budget of max. 700 ¬) only one canyon in question (best image quality is lacking compared to Panasonic and Sonynur s.der) one or other adjustment. Particularly interesting is the new Canon HF S200, which purports to be the new flagship. On camcorders-test was not yet a test, but do so in camcorder-info, which states that the camcorder is not a very good lowlight properties. That would of course be very painful.
So come to me really just the usual suspects Canons in the price category up to 700 euros in question:
HF11/HG20/HG21 (is the HG21 nor ever get under 700 euros?)
HF100/HF200 (HF100 lowlight has the better properties, but because of the lower data rate more artefacts)
HF M306/31/36 (lowlight in the field should not be synonymous tingly and an "artificial" looking sharp possess)
HF S11
HF S10/HF S100 is not synonymous (outstanding in lowlight areas)
The HV Series I once left out because the tape for me really does not come into question (I would have been happy to-HD) and I test on the HV40 camcorder-no test was found.
Have I forgotten a camcorder, or is this list quite well for orientation?
The budget is certainly not enough even to enter at somewhere in the prosumer range. But there is a camcorder vlt. (synonymous) of another brand, where I spend a few bucks and had to buy a real candidate?
I am grateful for every experience report or just a hint of my desire to purchase camcorder!
mfG Blade
