Frage von Peter:
Hello,
who has experience with one of these models? I must soon decide again, but have somehow lost the durchblick :-) I had already opted for the almost 32er, but I'm not so sure.
The best times I explain what I need the camcorder. Perhaps a start, it is only for private use. Do not think I'm going to film in hollywood :-) Did they use the vacation time here and there on a festive, party, ... All in all, more like amateur film. AV-in, in any case I need to connect an external camera module (so that I do not synonymous with skiing still needs to hold the camcorder). It should also be provided with a connection control to connect a cable remote (think most of the Sony models have this, or?) These are the connections eigendlich of her most important, I think times. Now, I have compared the three views. The 32 has the widest zoom range 20X no preference which has 42 12x and 10x optical zoom, the 90's. the 800x digital zoom in 32, 480x and 120x with HC42 in the 90s. Weight and size is roughly the same for all.
Lens of the 32er:
Carl Zeiss Super HAD CCD sensor 800,000 pixels
Lens of the HC42
Carl Zeiss CCD sensor 1 / 5, 5 "1.07 million pixels
Lens in the HC90
Super HAD CCD sensor with more than 3 megapixels, a Carl Zeiss ® Vario-Sonnar ® T *
there is a remarkable variety? What is enough? Would not only shoot outdoors with sunshine, but inside, and possibly synonymous with insulated light on such party's etc.
Or do you know a better camcorder for this application (and synonymous) in this price range
Many thanks already times in advance
Greeting
Peter
Antwort von Jan:
Hello Peter,
the models are indeed currently high in the Course and about you is often discussed, such as:
jvc-gr-dz7e-vs-sony-DCR-HC42E-what-is-better-cam -camcorder-which should take I - decision-for-sony-panasonic-or-cam But it is important for all three is a lot of automatics eg no direct shutter speeds, or the annoying touch screen for me (once the manual focus adjustment with the Touchscrenn one, s.besten a sunny day)
For a Tonverbesserung HC be 32 unusable, the rest outputs it with a Sony Microphone.
The bigger the CCD or CMOS Usually the better the image quality () you've already seen HC 32-HC 42-HC 90
In sleep recordings is Sonymeistens leader in the class.
I had indeed prescribed times recently and the HC 90, of course, the T * Vario-sonar (eagle eye) for more brilliance, less distortion, and the apochromatic lens corrector.
The battery tray in the HC 90 is not optimal, since the Batteries used by "Big" are begrentzt.
Well s.end'm like most around the Money
I wish you good choice
January
Antwort von Peter:
Hello Jan,
So if I can summarize views:
HC32 well
HC42 Better Optics and microphone possibility
HC90 very good possibility and microphone
Know today was in a shop, which I intended my chain ;-) Unfortunately, however, was none of the models there. Any amount already, but just the other 3 were not there. I've got a salesman and asked when it was more likely answer ne "they seek out one they go to the fund and then they have one, but please do not ask me's more," he has not formulated, but came across it. And when I ask him which of the models exhibited AV has, came only a shrug and then he said all this would have over 600 ¬. Recordings would all like to do it well it is only Läg s.jedem personally, which he has preferences touchscreen bezügluch bedienung (, buttons) and format.
Well, I think, to testify to the times I was not leaving.
Somehow I really do not come to a decision.
Did not some insider tip? :-)
must not necessarily be one of his models of the 3 mentioned.
Greeting
Peter
Antwort von Jan:
Hello,
with the handling of the war and is probably often underestimated. I want to make Kinen bad but at the transaction price gibts aktuelleüber some ¬ 600 AV in that do not have eg Panasonic GS 75,140,150, Canon MV-40, SonyPC 53 and most of Cam's DVD and hard disks. Well mistakes happen at every stop. That all 3 are not there, but it is amazing. Good, the HC 90 was synonymous not there and I get hopefully
it again next week, as has been described to me of times, delivers Sonyganz bad at the moment.
I have my preferences in every price category, such as eg Panasonic GS 75-140-150 (If you want to DV) SonyHC 90 (Although I do not like some other things) Panasonic GS 250 and then to 1000 ¬.
From the first impression is the new little Canon MVX 4i (I'm still waiting for the Canon today finally that send to me. It would be) very compact (skiing an amazing 1 / 2.8 "CCD has a price range, manual control over sound, DV + AV IN.
Several important connection options are there.
We'll see how bad the intrinsic noise, or whether they reasonably cope with less light (for me so 2 Canon weaknesses in the area until about 1000 ¬)
But one must say that all 4 Great Sony-Panasonic-Canon-JVC very close closer together, it's not unusual for the 4 similar models in several trade magazines, only 5 points (separated by 100).
As it seems you may Sonysehr one of the 3s were not wrong synonymous, is only a matter of price which ne.
LG
January
