Frage von Webermann:
Hello:)
I want to buy me for my company a semi-professional video camera. A professional lighting device of Elinchrom Hensel and already is at my disposal. Missing only really for the best camera.
Important to me is a good sharpness and resolution similar to DVD quality.
I want to portray the new hires and can play once a month in the conference room on a giant screen. So I think the DVD quality is the minimum necessary, or am I mistaken?
Yours sincerely
Bernd Webermann
Antwort von DV-Master:
With the quality you will not deceive you, even though almost all camcorders s.ca.
700 ¬ to bring good quality to the canvas.
as much as you would for a camcorder for disposal have??
Antwort von AndyZZ:
Do not come auber the idea to purchase a DVD camcorder!
Take a mini-DV camera, then adapts the synonymous with the post-processing.
Antwort von mkrawietz:
Hello Bernd W.,
MiniDV camcorders that record in the format on tape or on DVD in MPEG2 format, should provide about equally good picture quality. (Semi-) professionals will be sure MiniDV because of the better editing capabilities (+ + longer maturities media prefer lower costs). If the projector higher resolutions than PAL permits, would possibly synonymous an HDV camcorder into question ( 'Consumer' devices, such as HC1 or HC3 of Sonyab available) about 900 ¬.
Gruss
ph
Antwort von Webermann:
I thought s.ein budget to about $ 1500.
Consumer devices are not eligible. I always prefer semi-professional and professional equipment. I need synonymous
something in his hand, just in the video and photo area. Small appliances I can not lead a quiet, well not keep quiet.
Limited by size, I would imagine XL2 well a similar model. Since the price is the problem.
A DVD camcorder does not come into the basket, either HDV or MiniDV accordance with good resolution.
What am I Resolutionbenötige diagonal of projecting a 2-4 meters to be projected on a canvas?
With kind regards and thanks for the responses received to date
Bernd Webermann
Antwort von hombre:
either HDV or MiniDV accordance with good resolution.
What am I Resolutionbenötige diagonal of projecting a 2-4 meters to be projected on a canvas? MiniDV / DVD PAL camcorder to solve ALWAYS with 720 * 576 pixels. HDV gibts m. W. no single value - the edition is Model-/Herstellerabhängig.
Gruss
ph
Antwort von DV-Master:
I would say that you would be helping with the sony hc1.
+ super bild (hdv and 3Mio pixel)
+ connection many opportunities
+ super price (1300 ¬)
Antwort von WeiZen:
[quote = "Anonymous"]
In either HDV or MiniDV HDV with gibts m. W. no single value - the edition is Model-/Herstellerabhängig. Moin,
The already exists.
HDV1 720p
HDV2 1080i
Antwort von Phyro-Mane:
either HDV or MiniDV accordance with good resolution.
What am I Resolutionbenötige diagonal of projecting a 2-4 meters to be projected on a canvas?
MiniDV / DVD PAL camcorder to solve ALWAYS with 720 * 576 pixels. HDV gibts m. W. no single value - the edition is Model-/Herstellerabhängig.
Gruss
ph Does not synonymous.
MiniDV is erstmal only the recording medium.
The HC1 and HC3 is synonymous one MiniDV camcorder, but dissolves in HDV.
Antwort von hombre:
I wrote: PAL!
Who can read, was synonymous here have the advantage.
Gruss
ph
Antwort von Webermann:
Not argue that it brings you nothing. Is not so important who has more idea of the XXXXX with the longer gives way;)
The sony hc1 is too small to handle. As I said, I'm looking for something big with lots of buttons (not standing so to OSD menu navigation)
Antwort von WeiZen:
Then FX-1, Z1 or HVX-200, HL-1
(In ascending order of price)
Antwort von DV-Master:
is up to 1500 ¬ the hc1 but the biggest, but for 1700 ¬ you get a xm2, s.2300 ¬ or the Sony VX2100.
Antwort von Webermann:
Thank you for your help. I am just about me durchzuschauen products.
The XM2 seems to me, however, have no good Resolutionzu or am I mistaken? The Resolutionist by far not the most important but a little security for the future should already be guaranteed.
I'm not quite smart from the data:
Type 3 x CCD 1 / 4 inch Pixel Shift Pixel 3 x 470,000 (gross), effective 3 x 440,000
What Resolutionhat the camera for and how to calculate them from the 3 chips?
Yours sincerely
Bernd Webermann
Antwort von Webermann:
Addendum:
SonyHDR-FX1
SonyDCR-VX2100
The two cameras synonymous, I find it very interesting. How do the models? The FX1 seems to me a touch of professional and older to be ...
Kind regards
Webermann
Antwort von WeiZen:
Type 3 x CCD 1 / 4 inch Pixel Shift Pixel 3 x 470,000 (gross), effective 3 x 440,000
What Resolutionhat the camera for and how to calculate them from the 3 chips? Moin,
720x576 = approximately 440,000 (woe to the one now expects to:))
For each color, red, green, blue, is a chip there. So effectively we have only once made up 440,000, all for decades.
The FX-1 is an HDV Cam with 1920 (1440) x1080
The VX-2100 is a DV Cam with 720x576
Both are three-chip cameras, and both the intensity of your class representatives.
Antwort von prem:
@ Webermann
you're really brave, with such a lack of knowledge capitals like you tainted, I have withdrawn my previous 2 weeks in a hermitage with Google, etc. provided to embarrass myself and not so publicly.
Antwort von Markus:
you're really brave, with such a lack of knowledge as you afflicted capitals, ... Why do these comments always come of anonymous guests, is certainly clear. Otherwise this statement would be under each thread à la "Help, what professional camcorder should I buy to me, to max. 250 ¬. ;-)
Antwort von San-ju hachi:
Capital ignorance?
Everybody starts small! The forum is still synonymous for there to exchange information and learn from each other. Google I find shops, dubious tests and any other nonsense, but not people who are familiar with digital video cameras, or already had some in his hands.
I am here on jedenfall good hands and expert advice. If you prefer to take rather than to suffice with one crawler to communicate with real people ... Then I do not understand.
The XM2 has then yes schonmal Resolutiondie on one of the regular VGA (TV? Lies) the quality! But is that enough for my purposes synonymous regarding the video projection by beamer "?
Lieben Gruß
Bernd Webermann
Antwort von San-ju hachi:
"Pro Full Resolution Sample film is regarded by the enormously high Resolutionaber still sharp. Film is thus per pixel rather blurred, is due to the large Resolutionam final but again the physiological edge-sharp impression. If you count of 4k on a PAL DVD, download we see exactly synonymous, and it comes out a perfect picture. Even in the cinema projection has the Picture perfect. DV in PAL Resolutionsieht other hand, quite old. One way to avoid that is turning on HD. In fact, every HD format progress. But we can argue about whether HDV is synonymous progress because the quality is poor compared to a nominal DV per area. "
To what extent does it in PAL minidv old, so badly made?
Antwort von WeiZen:
Capital ignorance?
The XM2 has then yes schonmal Resolutiondie on one of the regular VGA (TV? Lies) the quality! no relation to TV, it is the same.
Antwort von Webermann:
Thank you:)
Would love it if would still respond to one or another of the outstanding issues.
Yours sincerely
Webermann
Antwort von dvfreak:
Hello
distinguished on the fx1 for VX2100:
First, I believe that I have read to me, or are prescribed, for the fx1 is a brand new model of sony, and the 2100 vx already several years on the market.
fx1 erstmal course, the better, as it hdv darstelleung desitzt acts, but not in the camcorder hdv VX2100 is not proposing in terms of picture quality. However, in my opinion well worth the 500 ¬ for various fx1.
but I wonder myself why you're interested in for the cameras as you have specified as the limit 1500 ¬, and the fx1 costs more than double.
gruß
Antwort von Jan:
Yes, I will not even know why the debate here on VX 2100 & FX-1 if the limit is 1500 ¬? Should it be used (FX is used 1 most probably synonymous with great fallen significantly over 1500 ¬) or the truck .... we want to bring the Z 1 & L 2 is still in the game?
1500 ¬ Max - and raise new and not HDV again war chest of 200 ¬ and XM 2 da gibts take nothing better updates, I did the last time is often synonymous with the XM 2 filmed, and my impression down here (adjacent link):
nv-gs-250-vs-nv-gs-500-vs-canon-XM1 HDV? may na SonyHDR the SR 1 which are special, but wait until she comes erstmal and how well the companies that support MPEG 4 Recording with editing programs.
VG
Jan
Antwort von lumpi:
... wanted to add synonymous nor my mustard ;-)
When I read for what you really need the Cam, I find the proposed equipment covered too ... But you want that particular candidates or new hires 'portraits', if I understood correctly. I imagine there is now time before an interview-situation ... is to come, in my opinion, almost any webcam on the market in question - since you do not have to spend 1500 ¬ for it ... and if you unscrew the cam on a tripod , there is not synonymous with the size ...
Antwort von prem:
And above all, the reasoning, "I stand on major matters with many buttons" :-)))
well, but if I should get a digital camera for my ne firma, I would have necessarily synonymous ne di Cheap taken, but 1500 ¬ is something hard.
Antwort von Bernd Webermann:
Thanks for Feesback!
For the work would be more favorable synonymous Camera ok. I am sure that I will use the Camera desöfteren synonymous private and basically I buy only quality matters. 1500 is much more than me but not the entire value. Except for 2000 there would be a semi-professional HDV solution, but for the old standard, I would now pay in the transition phase is no longer enough.
With so many models, a single Manufacturer raises every few months on the market is very confusing if you do not have time to work intensively with the material. I still do not know what your camcorder is the right one: (
Antwort von wolfgang:
Your problem may be that the demands of her FX1 one would fit perfectly - but there will hardly be for $ 1500. Moreover, it is just always questionable whether an HDV device for a beginner is the right choice - because it was something more s.Wissen required, and because the cut to stop synonymous of a little more difficult than the DV-avi. Synonymous and one should not forget that you are with the FX1 halt but rather nailed to 16:9 - what a crazy advantage if you want as a future 16:9 format. In 4:3 mode in SD and I would shoot with an FX1 does not stop sooner.
Thus for example the aforementioned XM2 or perhaps synonymous, the VX2100 would be a better choice.
Antwort von prem:
If indeed it now must be to stand - I think --
PAL - xm2 (new) or VX2100, dvx100 (gebr.) to the debate.
Trendsetting they are not, however, make a good picture.
HDV, well, I do not have it, but I am fan of the n HC1.
For example 1400EUR you can do when nothing wrong.
Even if they are ultimately used only for PAL - logically
HDV and downconverted received.
From the FX1, I'd let my fingers. sorry, anyone
will come to feel, but the first generation of Pro/Kon-
sumer was not satisfactory.
And, uh, is your area of application so simple, you deserve it
Money or the Späßken? If making money, then no
wonder what that working animals cost synonymous.
And Relating to Beamer synonymous You know too little .. Ouch ..
Either PAL / NTSC (SD), HDV - or PC format.
mfg chmee
Antwort von wolfgang:
From the FX1, I'd let my fingers. sorry, anyone
will come to feel, but the first generation of Pro/Kon-
sumer was not satisfactory.
So I feel kicked when not - but I can not understand the content. I have an FX1, but does not know what it should not be satisfactory. The FX1 has good characteristics in my experience, certainly, if the device as a HDV device uses.
Antwort von Bernd Webermann:
Because you're right. I have little experience in the field.
Am therefore all the more that ye annnimmt me and my cause is at Page!
The whole thing is as I said to my business and basically a joke. But I'm just simply not the man who is satisfied with standard equipment.
Once I had me a little busy, I want more features and why I buy or I would really like paying twice.
To what extent it is worth waiting for your opinion about anything except for the prosumer market is experiencing downward price momentum? If this is a matter of a month or two I'll take the time. But in the latest three months I need the camera because then an employee of my stops have been made of the videos with his camera in passing.
Yours sincerely
Bernd Webermann
Antwort von Markus:
... except for the prosumer market is experiencing downward price momentum? But that is a constant rollercoaster ... both the price here as synonymous of the processing quality of the equipment. ;-)
Antwort von Bernd Webermann:
Hehe, the impression I had been synonymous with digital cameras.
At the same time, I ask once for the hardware, a PC must have to properly deal with video editing programs angemommen to use Premiere for HDV resolution?
What type of Ram is suitable and how much one should at least use?
Yours sincerely
Bernd Webermann
Antwort von wolfgang:
But that is a constant rollercoaster ... both the price here as synonymous of the processing quality of the equipment. ;-) And precisely for this reason there will always legendary equipment, such as the Panasonic NV-MX300 or 350, which have just been produced and sold
prior to the emaciation and. The FX1 could be synonymous something.
Antwort von Bernd Webermann:
The FX-1, I consider it a synonymous class device. I did test shots from another forum with the camera view and I am extremely excited. Seems to be very Lichtstark, Henkel's turn, Carl Zeiss-off involved.
What I lack is an interface for direct transfer to the PC FireWire.
But perhaps there is still a retrofit kit. Anyway, I'm convinced Sony user, and enthusiasm of the high-priced products. The entry-level models, however, often have a rather limited - quality - is now free again!
That reminds me immediately the first question here about HDV. What is the volume of data for 60 minutes movie at 1080i resolution?
A new computer is in fact also be due, and I'm not sure if the hardware is sufficient for the processing of material in HDV 1080i. Especially in the hard disk capacity, I'm still undecided.
3.6 GHz, Intel
2 GB DDR-2 800
2x 7200U / m 160GB SATA in association
Nvidia Geforce 7300 256MB
Many times I can only tell you how grateful I am for your participation s.meinem projects. I think it's great that you help me even though we did not recognize us and I am impressed at how casually she enters my beginner questions but I just do it again: Thank you dear community!
Yours sincerely
Bernd Webermann
Antwort von Markus:
What I lack is an interface for direct transfer to the PC FireWire. So if you think the FX1, look even closer look! - Do you think your calculator, a retrofit would be approximately ¬ 10-15. With uncluttered Firewire cable a little more, with video-editing program a little more. ;-)
