Frage von Acer:
Hello, everybody,
here is yes to one s.and rated camcorder or image defects or the like, and you want to show it to other users. Can hieer his video upload in the forum, what do you think?
Ciao,
Philip
* edit *
Somehow seems the third answer choice net: it reads: Unnecessarily
Antwort von Gast:
Can this theory does not anyway? An MPEG packaged as a ZIP.
Allowed file extensions and their file sizes
Archives -> Maximum Upload Size: 5 MB
ace gtar gz rar tar zip
Antwort von Acer:
Does anyone know how everyone goes. And the Programs? 5MB something is bad enough for their own projects, etc. And, mpeg2, hardly anyone would so strak compress until it was mutilated on the unknowable!
Antwort von Gast:
5MB something is bad enough for their own projects, etc. And, mpeg2, hardly anyone would so strak compress until it was mutilated on the unknowable! Yes, that's true. However, one can but ill upload a DV-AVI file with a size of 3.6 MB per second.
In order to post some image errors that might may already two or three still pictures to be exhaustive enough.
Upload your videos can not hurt, no question. Whether and how it might be useful to realize remains to be seen - I think to MPEG WMV od Getting Around you is not there, if you want to post all the film projects.
Antwort von Acer:
Whole. Avi projects josos, scheduled to be times ...
Of course, I mean mpeg2 or wmv. net stop sooooo much compressed ...
When you consider how far the forum in a short time "was developed" attachment feature, Survey function, and before that a lot, man. Then the jkommt synonymous determined yet, right?
Antwort von Markus:
* edit *
Somehow seems the third answer choice net: it reads: Unnecessarily Hello Philip,
I added the third choice reply in your survey. Funny, that does not work with you ... was ever so! What if you three choices in a poll dazunimmst and simply want to provide a fourth, so he was three displays? Is that possible?
As for the uploading of any video so I'm divided. On the one hand it would certainly be nice if you look at the films of the users could download directly of slashCAM. Conversely, many amateur filmmakers compressing dominate only if it is not required ( "how do I cut the images of my DV camcorder, which I have gecapturet to DivX?"). ;-)
Antwort von AndyZZ:
And who is the undoubtedly the giant exploding data available if everyone here can upload their movies. It simply will probably within a few days in the hunderfachen GB range?! And I could imagine that the page then, because of the increased traffic, probably synonymous difficult to reach and is no longer so comfortable and fast, like now.
In other words, I am against it.
Antwort von Acer:
You have certain rights. But when her time comes in the Forum overview on my projects, you will see that slashCAM have allocated over 3 years, only 41 films. Some users have their own Web site, the remaining net knows where with the projects and keep them either:
see at home
or
b) go to pages where you can pay vast amounts of ¬ needs to show a movie
It would be cool if you could have this feature, but it need not be. Maybe we can get synonymous provided on request (email) to the exact quantity Admis s.FP memory available, as is the movie great. But those are all spinning.
@ Mark
Is Yes, I think the reason could be, thank you;).
Cu
Philip
Antwort von blip:
Witty, spoke recently about exactly this topic. Perhaps we should have our newsrooms to eavesdropping bugs :-) browse ... It is, of course, the logical progression, and long overdue here in order to exchange views on technical issues is not an end in itself.
The My Projects forum is a step in that direction was, only just, unfortunately, with the proviso that its own home is needed. As a minimal solution would actually go further than the file upload function. We would of been smart, but if the clips could be presented in a clearer and, perhaps even by genre (ordered) is important s.einer certain amount, with additional information and materials (ie how the film was made, movie poster, etc.) that we comment on them in the forum to evaluate and possibly even uswusf. We were like an extra slashcam section would be good, which would be separate from the forum but still connected, as synonymous with our news-magazine in the works section.
After some searching, we now have hopefully found a way to do it on their own without much programming. Nevertheless, it is of course a lot s.Arbeit adapt the whole thing. It would therefore be great to hear what s.einer from your point of view such a film section would be important / desirable, so we can concentrate on the essentials.
What Space and traffic is concerned, we have something erstmal buffer, and synonymous actually explode if the uploads "into a gigantic" should (synonymous nice), will soon find a way. The course should not come at the expense of performance, where it finally everything is running fast.
Compress the clips must be, synonymous so they can see more people. We would be prepared in any case a tutorial article à la "how do I compress my video for the net," as little assistance. (That sounds bad naive, but his confidence is half the battle, or something like that.) And when the clips are too lousy, then they just find no audience.
Ums summarize again: even turned to the videos and download on-Rauf slashcam: absolutely!
More like in the near future.
heidi / slashcam
