Frage von Frank B.:Hello,
among techn. Data in Slashcam - camcorder comparison is that the FX 1 no manual aperture setting would have. What's up? My but has an aperture scheme!
Frank
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Next few lines above in the same list is synonymous correctly so that the Aperture manual can be set. This contradiction is not the only flaw in this overview camcorder, so such a thing before purchasing a rather more times with other sources!
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von rudi:
Give us just a short notice, please, if your a mistake like this will ...
In these volumes of data it is clear that occasionally a typo somewhere in there, we obviously like to correct, if we know them. Incidentally, even the technical specifications of the manufacturer is not always accurate, so we often referred to as synonymous hook them. And of course we would look if the database is useful for many people is ...
Many greetings
Rudi
Antwort von Jan:
Rudi Yes, just go to Sony.De, the failure rate for digicams and video cameras is quite high. Especially bad for the comparisons of the cameras.
I think our error rate is rather low. In 1000ten of error contributions are not excluded.
VG
Jan
Antwort von Genorade:
I think our error rate is rather low. In 1000ten of error contributions are not excluded.
VG
Jan Ähh Jan, I think Rudi related to the information on the
Antwort von Frank B.:
Did I already thought that it was a mistake that must be.
A typo, it is not, however, since you do not simple 4 wrong buttons on the word "No" can be put together, if it were actually "Yes" should stand. It is either a research or Schusseligkeitsfehler. Faulty research may not be synonymous, because in fact, next up a correct reference to the existing aperture function is - thank you Bernd, I have my scatterbrained did not immediately noticed.
So Conclusion: A Schusseligkeitsfehler (can always happen), but when such an important feature to have one or the other could influence purchasing decisions. Thus, my demand.
My choices do I never of a single test or a source of information-dependent.
And again to clarify: Your comparison is unique and I was (despite the error) a great help in making decisions for the 1st FX
Gruß Frank
Antwort von Jan:
I meant it in general on our forum.
And who usually writes little less synonymous error.
Just have a look at Sony.de - what the company so nice camera for making comparisons.
VG
Jan