Frage von sirneo:
Hello,
I'm absoulter beginner! I have a Pana HDSD9 and would like my shots just to merge can!
So I have many videos about the so-1-3 min. long, I would like this to an entire video can bring together!
Therefore i need a software such as AVCHD footage lossless editing.
My laptop is just the ghost, so I always wanted a laptop for geegneten editing of AVCHD recordings are suitable!
If you have tips as synonymous happy!
Many thanks in advance
sirneo
Antwort von Manu72:
Hello,
synonymous'm not exactly a pro, but had the same problem. Loss-free and smooth was still synonymous with me in spite of Intel Core 2 Duo only possible with Edius Neo (loss-free conversion to AVI). Not only join of clips, but a complete editing solution. Is but the handling is not trivial. Because you need many hours. But if you - I think - two newcomers Lernkurs've seen and understood, the mere assembly of clips a breeze.
Search times on ebay after Edius Neo. Habs I get for 59 euros.
Antwort von wolfgang:
The equipment supplied with the software can actually clips usually without renewed rendering join, as far as I know.
In the video venue synonymous gibts AVCmerge the free software, but whether the material works with SD9, I not sure.
http://www.videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=4725
Edit: no, but should not go, because Panasonic has s.AVC codec which apparently changed again, compared to earlier versions.
The solution mentioned Canopus is a very good quality, but of course is the conversion to the Canopus HQ codec not completely lossless, Manuela. And it is especially good for subsequent editing, synonymous to the older systems with this I-frame only codec problem then simply works. But this is not the merging of pure AVCHD clips.
Antwort von Manu72:
The solution mentioned Canopus is a very good quality, but of course is the conversion to the Canopus HQ codec not completely lossless, Manuela.
Canopus, or the program called Edius Neo format Canopus AVI lossless ". The data volume tenfold after the conversion. For me it's lossless. If not, it is synonymous to me no preference. I see at least no loss.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Well if you think:))
Antwort von Manu72:
Well if you think:)) If you have ne other opinions, I would be interested in the.
Tell the Canopus because of some nonsense (because of loss)?
Antwort von wolfgang:
Canopus s.dem Eck says is certainly no fool, but your interpretation does not hold true. Even when Umrendern of HDV AVCHD as synonymous to the Canopus HQ codec (and that is primarily used as intermediate, not the Canopus losseless) is to render a certain loss of synonymous unavoidable, and you certainly can measure (but in usually relatively low). The same is the Canopus losseless the case.
There are codecs used in the further rendering losseless next generations would compress - but only if this codec is addressed to this same codec next renders. The Canopus HQ that does not belong to, but its losses in the further rendering over 10 are self Render generations from extremely low.
And of course, intermediates such as the Canopus HQ codec not final codecs - such as for Blu Ray, we render to mpeg2 HD or AVC, for Internet presentations perhaps wmv - all steps that are also re-lossy. Again, these losses are rendered in a normal workflow is not avoidable.
For HDV, I have time before the exact time graumer viewed:
http://videotreffpunkt.com/tutorials/Intermediates/IntermediatesPart1.html
Further investigation, we had here:
http://www.videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=2700
Antwort von hbernhard:
Premiere element 7 processed 2 tracks AVCHD material more or less in real time. Should a Beginner's ok. If you want deeper self -> the info is already in this thread
LG hbernhard
Antwort von Manu72:
Canopus s.dem Eck says is certainly no fool, but your interpretation does not hold true. Even when Umrendern of HDV AVCHD as synonymous to the Canopus HQ codec (and that is primarily used as intermediate, not the Canopus losseless) is to render a certain loss of synonymous unavoidable, and you certainly can measure (but in usually relatively low). The same is the Canopus losseless the case.
There are codecs used in the further rendering losseless next generations would compress - but only if this codec is addressed to this same codec next renders. The Canopus HQ that does not belong to, but its losses in the further rendering over 10 are self Render generations from extremely low.
And of course, intermediates such as the Canopus HQ codec not final codecs - such as for Blu Ray, we render to mpeg2 HD or AVC, for Internet presentations perhaps wmv - all steps that are also re-lossy. Again, these losses are rendered in a normal workflow is not avoidable.
For HDV, I have time before the exact time graumer viewed:
http://videotreffpunkt.com/tutorials/Intermediates/IntermediatesPart1.html
Further investigation, we had here:
http://www.videotreffpunkt.com/thread.php?threadid=2700 Thank you, very good explanation. Some of them I even understood. Well, it's mighty complicated. Synonymous yes I would prefer to edit AVCHD natively, but my PC does not simply with. Therefore, I landed at Canopus. The technical details are now just me no preference. I'm learning still.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Well the work on the Canopus HQ codec is synonymous not a bad way, the quality is quite ok already. And just for something older PCs is the road on a perfectly good intermediates. So if it works, then why should it change to what time?
