Newsmeldung von slashCAM:SonyHDR-FX7 from November of thomas - 7 Sep 2006 11:50:00 The information flow: Probably starting November the SonyFX7 have to be about 3700 euro. The following technical specifications: 3x 1 / 3 "ClearVid CMOS sensors 960x1080 (60i) recording in 1080i HDV and DV, no more Cineframe mode, 8 lux at 1 / 60, compared to 20X optical zoom (12x with the FX1), optical Image stabilization, 3.5 "LCD with 211,000 pixels, 1.6fache contrast / saturation of the FX1, 40% smaller and 25% lighter than the FX1 (1.4kg to 1.9kg), 4x slow motion mode (Smooth Slow Recording - 240 fields / second in 6 seconds and played in 24 seconds) until not (to 6 Picture Profiles, HDMI output, a conventional accessories Adapters Active Interface Shoe), LCD screen and viewfinder simultaneously active, photos during video recording in a Resolutionvon 1.2-megapixels, no analog video input, not XLR microphone inputs but mini-jack, and no separate control of the two audio channels.
to news reporting
Antwort von domain:
With these data, I would not really FX7 as a much-improved successor to the FX1 can see, but rather as a model for Movers previous HC1 owners. If the utopian views price as at about 2500, - or less will be dropped, then the FX7 could raise security with new groups of buyers.
LG domain
Antwort von Andjey:
With these data, I would not really FX7 as a much-improved successor to the FX1 can see, but rather as a model for Movers previous HC1 owners. If the utopian views price as at about 2500, - or less will be dropped, then the FX7 could raise security with new groups of buyers.
LG domain Dollar price is 3500th - which implies a lower delivered price here hope road ... maybe soon 3200 Euro? The new Canon models are likely to contribute to the fall in prices synonymous ...
Antwort von Andjey:
The FX 7 looks like 'ne mixture of HC1 (the terminal block) under the display, an FX1 (the body) around the lens, a VX 1000 (Regular) and VX) 2100 (backside.
As a model for HC1 Movers owner should it (too expensive should be as at 2800, - Euro lie), as a substitute for FX1 can too little (in FX features are important to owners or techn. Data).
I'm curious if the FX1 and / or HC1 wieter remain in the program or not.
gruss
Antwort von xandix:
Oops, forgot to login ...
Regards
Antwort von domain:
Yes, yes, quite magnificent mutt, the FX7!
The Canon XH-A1, I would see as direct competition with the elderly FX1, it is even much more voluminous than the FX1, and therefore can feel more secure with it than with flay the relatively delicate FX7. This is probably a new group of buyers to be addressed. Let's see how will the CMOS-3-Chipper in Comparison to Canon and beating the FX1 in the light sensitivity.
The placement of the Canon diplays I find cool if synonymous in the handling probably a bit cumbersome (motion in 2 axes necessary) and synonymous (too small, only 2.8 inches).
The number of pixels of the Canon is probably the optimum range (1.56 million square 1440 * 1080) and significantly higher than the FX1 and FX7. Where, however, synonymous with the disadvantages of sensitivity to light, let's see.
20x zoom is nice, but the Tele is mostly for naught anyway, more important is the wide angle range and is both ok.
LG domain
Antwort von wolfgang:
If the FX1 will not remain in the program, or equivalent which will be replaced - then announced Canon devices are extremely embark ...
Antwort von xandix:
If the FX1 will not remain in the program, or equivalent which will be replaced - then announced Canon devices are extremely embark ... I am excited about the Canon synonymous, I think that's the "real" successor of FX1/Z1.
The FX7 is a "halfway house" (between the FX1 and HC1).
Who wants to work professionally, is preferable in any case, the Canon ...
But we are only waiting time from initial test results, until now there does not ne ne FX7 still testing the XH-A1.
Before we can not judge the picture quality is anything but speculative ...
Gruss
Antwort von Andjey:
Hi Thomas!
Here speaks the indefatigable avenger against those who still write
LCD display. ausgedeutscht you have your views, what does that mean? Liquid Crystal Display - display. should people in the video "business does not really happen"! ;-)
But even in the brochures "professional" I make it over and over again. embarrassing!
all ministries in the same. PIN (Personal Identification Number number)
gruss,
The Avenger
Antwort von prem:
Degenerate without the thread now to let: Your Avenger deployment comes too late.
"Display Type" has-although confessedly as wrong-already naturalized.
Comparison views on Google: Almost 4 million for "LCD" and just under 2 million for "LCD".
So nimms easy ....
Antwort von PoopShooter:
I hardly think it can be seen as the successor to the FX1. More of a halfway house.
Precisely the advantage of the LCD, the FX1 is sitting welöches far forward, is missing here. In the FX1 can be great, the camera button on the shoulder and looking at the LCD. That is a huge advantage in Aufnahemn without tripod. That falls flat at the FX7, models like the VX1000/2000. Therefore, it is a camera for me is not in question. A semi professional camera does not rely on the students to be able to me is an absolute knockout criterion.
Antwort von blip:
Small news update: Sonyhat today announced that it is in the FX7 / V1 is an extension of HDV products. The FX1 and Z1 therefore remain in the program.
Heidi / slashcam
Antwort von JoeFX:
So I think the FX7 echt geil!
A six-seconds-super slow motion! stretched to 24! Fat Fat Fat!
The Hc3 has already taken care of for me aufruhr three seconds slow motion. With six seconds is already ne little bullet time possible.
Moreover, the so-aperture should be. Here I am with my gr punished x5e yes.
I think the FX7 is a polished blend of HC1/HC3. Not Bad!
Since Sonyan thought the slow motion freaks.
I am so excited like a little kid at Christmas.
MFG JoeFX
Antwort von dvcut:
Street price will be EUR 3,000. Small typo in Slashcam.
The three CMOS chips bring a Resolutionvon per 1.12 Megapixels, and are 1 / 4 inches tall.
Antwort von prem:
I think that's all well and good, but the main thing for me is still missing: Which recording format??
- MPEG-2
or
- New AVCHD?
about 3700 euro wolh the "retail price", which may be in the right stores a lot cheaper!
The camera certainly offers what, but the professional lacks the XLR audio inputs ... But it is synonymous to give the V1!
Canon cameras are more expensive (logical to some that they are synonymous professional)
Antwort von Martin:
I think that's all well and good, but the main thing for me is still missing: Which recording format??
- MPEG-2
or
- New AVCHD?
Anything in it: HDV 1080i. This is clearly defined, ie MPEG2, 1440x1080 16:9 with non-square pixels.
Greeting
Martin
Antwort von unregistriert:
ausgedeutscht you have your views, what does that mean? Liquid Crystal Display - display. should people in the video "business does not really happen"! ;-) If you have no idea, you should simply not open your mouth, so far, and not just Wikipedia acquire knowledge.
LCD is of Liquid Crystal Diode ...
times had to be sorry
Antwort von PowerMac:
1) There are "LCD" as a term for a panel, a display device, a liquid crystal display.
2) There are "LCD" to refer to a technology or a single element, liquid crystal diode.
1) is now synonymous of experts and correctly considered to be usual version, in which a duplication of display is absurd. When one of "LCD" speaks, we mean 1)
2) comes from the 80s and is more a technical description of a functioning, the m. M., according to not quite right. A liquid crystal cell as of Schadt is actually something quite different than a diode. Even our house physicist claimed das
Antwort von domain:
So I think the FX7 echt geil!
A six-seconds-super slow motion! stretched to 24! Fat Fat Fat!
MFG JoeFX I guess strong that the slow dissolution of the FX7 synonymous only 640 * 480 as will amount to the HC3, which is not even my opinion DV Resolutionund not particularly bold ;-)
LG domain
Antwort von Martin:
I guess strong that the slow dissolution of the FX7 synonymous only 640 * 480 as will amount to the HC3, which is not even my opinion DV Resolutionund not particularly bold ;-) Huh? 640 * 480 does not sound very attractive - this "great feature" in the prospectus will, of course, concealed ;-)
Perhaps that is still interlaced? If so, then I do not understand it completely, why are there no longer slow motion shots possible. Stretch 6 seconds to 24 seconds, then it would be used 200i instead of 50i, hence a factor of 4 s.Bildfolge. 640x480 is less than 1 / 5 the size of 1440x1080 ...
Using the same calculation it would apply in the DV format to 3.75 frames per second. For me it would be durable 3-fold slow motion always attractive at full PAL and 6 seconds at 640x480.
Greeting
Martin
Antwort von domain:
The slow motion shots are not even written directly to tape, but cached to RAM memory and then write only on tape. This memory has been doubled with the FX7 to the HC3 well, but I'm afraid will s.Prinzip have not changed much.
LG domain.
Antwort von Der Die Das:
If you have no idea, you should simply not open your mouth, so far, and not just Wikipedia acquire knowledge.
LCD is of Liquid Crystal Diode ...
times had to be sorry Liquid Crystal _Display_
mac4ever
