Frage von Patrick:
Hello,
'm new here and would need a little advice of times users with vision:)
I want to buy a DV cam. Should not be just for a hobby. Am planning to study in the direction and needed equipment.
Now I am faced with the question whether I should bet on the future and I will buy the SonyHC1. Is still more of a consumer camera, but for HD capable and it makes more sense in the Canon because of the immense xm2 Controls fetch it, but losing to HD at ...
Is very difficult for me because I can not estimate to what extent HD is still in its infancy, and finally (gehts am still a student) to to have lots of money ....
Thank you and nice evening,
Patrick Thomas
Antwort von deepcode:
No easy decision ..
But in the end gives you the HC wippe 1 more, but with a rather strange handling (touch screen, exposure, ..).
The higher Resolutionist a clear plus, synonymous to the loss of resolution in low light can get over, because as the HC-3 is still significantly higher than the Canon. And a small cam has many advantages if you're not necessarily trying to impress industry people - but it succeeds with an XM synonymous only moderate, since it takes quite a sexy XL2 ;-)
If you want to breathe the air you a superior professional rig consisting of HC-3 (HC-1 better than, better Low Light), a 35mm adapter with Canon Mount and a set of Canon FD lenses which there are very favorable. By doing this you have the same views 35mm look, good resolution, manual aperture and focus and learn to tell mainly in 35mm look at.
Antwort von universl:
deepcode has since been quite what I like so much but s.der xm2 is saugut optical image stabilizer. We often shoot rapidly (stunts and so, for example is an MX-time high jumper with the motocross machine) drübergesprungen about me, as a light camera with good picture and had to stabilisator ago. The lowlight capabilities are synonymous not to be despised. but it is not hdv.
Test s.besten both before and you think what you need for the camera. A typical camera tripod is the xm2 not. For me rather an action-cam.
anmerkung for xl2: at the break after 20-30 minutes of my film the poor s.im shoulder inset, the cruelly ding is top-heavy, so many back packs anton bauer draufschnallen can not, because the result is a equilibrium. But great pictures, really. And sauteuer.
Antwort von prem:
Many thanks for your responses erstmal ...
I definitely difficult to define in one direction. I tend to look for the all-rounder ....
Can you tell which one in the next 3 years is still operated with the conventional technique or need not get one without the HD?
A few more questions which torment me:
- To what extent is the 1chip the technology is still at a disadvantage in Comparison to xm2.
-Is it very limited with adjustable & fuktionsvielfalt the hc1?
-Which is better suited than Steadicam?
And how good is the picture quality of xm2 .. Do you have time, perhaps as a link ready to make a short video. google my friend had nothing to offer.
Thank you and good night,
Patrick
Antwort von Skinnyrules:
Can you tell which one in the next 3 years operated with the conventional technique or need not get one without the HD?
This point we can only speculate. HD will certainly play an increasing role, but when this will actually prevail in the consumer sector remains to be seen. For me it is synonymous still the question of which of the HD format to prevail now. Presumably 720p in Europe, but that seems not yet to be conclusively settled.
When I look now, but still wanted to buy an SD camera, then I would probably take of the Panasonic DVX100 - Image quality, Low light behavior, color quality, full screen view (even 24p) - almost everything is just right. Only the native 16:9 mode would fail me s.dieser Cam - but that is certainly not a must have for every feature. Price you get the Cam is now so synonymous in the class of the XM2.
A few more questions which torment me:
-Which is better suited than Steadicam?
The first two things I can not say anything because I do not know the HC1 and it was synonymous not yet used.
But what do you mean with Steadicam? That's not really a camera, but a tripod. If that allude to the Image Stabilization: The XM2 is in really very good.
And how good is the picture quality of xm2 .. Do you have time, perhaps as a link ready to make a short video. google my friend had nothing to offer.
Thank you and good night,
Patrick This is really great - to my mind would perhaps like to be a bit sharper (in the Comparison of the Panasonic DVX me any better material), but otherwise the XM2 makes great pictures - if you have enough light. Anyone who shoots a lot of parties or in darker areas could, but with s.Grenzen the XM2 without additional head lights very quickly come (here with Cam-1 is / 3 inch chip is certainly better), but otherwise I can only recommend the XM2.
Greeting
Tim
Antwort von wolfgang:
I just say: both devices s.einen high-definition plasma or LCD to attach, and compare times. Each HDV camcorder puts the majority of computing devices well into the pocket in terms of sharpness, Resolutionund details.
Future-proof HDV is well - but what about in 3 years that is anyway not clear. Maybe Panasonic has hitherto prevailed, and we no longer shoot in HDV, but in HD ...
Antwort von Skinnyrules:
Good morning,
one question I must ask s.The connoisseur of the HC-1:
Sharpness and image quality outweighs synonymous, if I format the standard DV movies, in Comparison to "normal" DV cameras, or who proposes to Sonydort same / worse?
Antwort von Patrick:
sorry, I can answer myself
In real DV mode sets the camera however, not all top s.The Einchipper, but what's the use? It even makes virtually no sense to use this mode at all. If you film HDVHDV explained in the glossary, the camera, the signal still herunterkonvertieren on-the-fly. So if you still want to cut it into DV, which is still possible and program for editing the images seem as though they came of a DV mixers. And the down converted signal looks like this really top-notch. Of course you can use synonymous to downscale the computer itself, but there's a problem: Compared with an analog output signal is s.der Camera is not filtered. At high frequencies, the signal tends therefore easily as Mori. This is synonymous to the reason why many of my tester, the analog signal conversion through the camera look better than scaling s.Calculator. With the right software, a digital conversion should be better in every case. However, we will look at greater detail in other times with this problem ... So the decision is made ....
More or less synonymous for deepcode's posting ...
maybe you can just go out a little more detail (possibly nen link where I think, mentioned accessories)
... a rig consisting of) from HC-3 (HC-1 better than, better LowLight a 35mm adapter with Canon Mount and a set of Canon FD lenses which are very cheap.
Antwort von jens:
Sharpness and image quality outweighs synonymous, if I format the standard DV movies, in Comparison to "normal" DV cameras, or who proposes to Sonydort same / worse? Without even a used HC1 according to the same can not always hear back out, that the recorded in DV mode picture will be more likely not have been the charm. However, a recorded in hdv to SD and then scaled all.
Regards,
Jens
Antwort von jojo:
I'm using the HC1 now been just over 1 / 2 years and am filled with the Picture and quite satisfied.
There is a very good on the HC1 Page:
