Infoseite // SonyHDR-SR1 or-HC3?

Frage von Caro:


Hi,

I plan to purchase a camcorder and I would be s.liebsten for SonyHDR-SR1 (or SonyHDR-HC3 miniDV) to decide.

My problem: I would like after the shooting the videos in best quality on DVD burn. With the PC is, as far as I know, unfortunately, not possible.

Would this also a "DVD Recorder HDMI" necessary? Which Connections (DV or other interface) should I look?

Has perhaps anyone already experience with SonyHDR can-SR1 and the dubbing to a DVD recorder, HDMI "?

That would give me anything to help. Thanks in advance. :-)

Many greetings

Caro



Antwort von Caro:

Hi,

I try it again with another question. ;-)

Buying a camcorder is planned. However, I unfortunately do not come alone next.

SonyHDR-HC1E, SonyHDR-SR1E or SonyHDR-HC3E?

I would like about 40 min s.Stück film (without having to switch to LP). That's why I doubt whether so much to fit MiniDV (best quality)?

Who better camcorder in a similar price range white, then that is synonymous ok. :-)

Thanks in advance

Caro



Antwort von petepopcorn:

Standard MiniDV, 60 min at the highest quality, would be 90th LP
So the criterion would be where! :)



Antwort von Markus:

There are synonymous MiniDV tapes with 80 minutes duration. Standard Play mind. But the tapes with 60 minutes duration are much more common. ;-)



Antwort von Caro:

Thanks for the info. :-)

I would perhaps interest s.der Canon XM2 miniDV. But my problem is that in small rooms, I want to film. The dimensions appear to me quite "huge". Finally, I will not annoy my fellow man. ;-) Do you know the problem?

Will the Sony camcorder s.die quality of Canon XM2 miniDV up?

Thank you. :-)



Antwort von rush:

sony vx2000 and sony equivalent would be an alternative ...

problem in small rooms, you will more likely with the weitwinkel, because for most of the camcorder tends to be poor and you fail without weitwinkel converter often not soo much as you want to receive image ...



Antwort von petepopcorn:

Thanks, but I felt rather Comparison:

Canon XM2 miniDV against HDR-SR1?

If this whole new technology of the HDR-SR1 the Picture-and sound quality of the old Canon XM2 miniDV? Of 16:9 or HDR apart.



Antwort von Jan:

Hello,

LP comes in HDV on MiniDV sometimes not.

The DM XM 2 has approximately 40 mm and the VX 2100 ca 43 mm wide (small), even a little ahead of Canon. But you must say 40 mm is still very weak, because you will a wide-angle converter 0.6 or 0.7 x to use it inside rather what to get.

DV vs. HDV is here 1000te contributions, to speak now, I do not. You compare grade 2 totally different systems vs. Jeep sports.

For me, in short, if you have a high definition television / video projector, a mint-equipped calculator, current SW, a very quiet camera work (synonymous to the tripod) brings you an HDV & AVCHD significantly longer in the same price category.

In terms of sharpness wins every AVCHD & HDV to a SD 576i Comparable Pal.

Sound is not much better, the proposition of AVCHD 5.1 sounds a little better, but with true surround sound has nothing to do, you also need an HDMI cable s.einer AVCHD to multichannel to admire.

In addition, there are 4 channel sound already synonymous with the 576i class Sonyin zb DVD 505th

VG
Jan



Antwort von petepopcorn:

Thank you very much. That helps even next. :-)

What really interested me: I have no way of recording on my PC to play. :-(

So like "save" my recordings (HDV) so that quality is maintained? I would have a normal DVD recorder, but it needs to have a HDMI recorder?

Short asked: Can I use the HDV recording on DV-HDMI connection to a recorder to play on without sacrificing quality?

Thank you and sorry that I really have little clue.






Antwort von Jan:

Sounds a little confused.

First you need a high resolution! DVD Players & Recorders (eg Toshiba HD XE-1 & Panasonic BD 10), receiver (eg some of Xoro) that you probably do not have. The usual work synonymous with PAL 576i, there may be a AVCHD & HDV their sharpness in principle do not bring power.

One part has a projector or LCD, Rückpro or plasma TV, then you can directly with the camera via HDMI & component cable the picture quality to admire a AVCHD & HDV.

If you have a tube TV Pal 576i daheim searched, and so quickly none of the above you buy is the AVCHD & HDV Camera actually a waste of money, so how about the Porsche drive and always in a zone 30 of the regular police monitored - Never motorway or country roads.

VG
Jan



Antwort von Caro:

I want to buy it here:

http://www.amazon.de/Pioneer-DVD-Harddisks-Rekorder-DivX-zertifiziert-silber/dp/B000JLSOUI/sr=1-2/qid=1171986903/ref=sr_1_2/303-0797691-7920228?ie = UTF8 & s = ce-de

And perhaps the SonyHDR-SR1.

So I could go with the above recorder without loss of quality of the recordings to play on your camcorder and burn to DVD? Or is there a catch?

Thank you very much

Caro



Antwort von Jan:

I am in the device is not quite sure DVD recorder is synonymous not my primary area of expertise. A little bit of quality he is already rauskitzeln.

With the Full HD Panasonic BD 10 is he probably does not come with, besides the data should not be obsolete in a DVD, but HD DVD (Toshiba) or Blue Ray (Panasonic) synonymous already because of the square ground.

By Camera SonySR 1 (AVCHD) - clearly the best unit Panasonic BD 10, because he is with the same technique works - Blue Ray MPEG-4 H.264 (SR 1), others need to use a normal DVD material to MPEG 4 encoding MPEG 2 it's tainted with losses, and the 576i with Pal - quality is lost synonymous if the DVD player, the playback material can inflate to 1080.

Without a high-resolution television you do not come next ....

VG
Jan



Antwort von beiti:

@ Caro
I am afraid, you generally have little idea of the various video standards, because you SDTV and HDTV systems durcheinanderwürfelst wild. If you are of "the best DVD quality" speak, it is not clear whether you order traditional video DVDs do (which each player can play DVD, but the only SD Resolutionerreichen), or whether you of an island solution for playback of HD - Shooting speak (the DVDs are then outside the norm, the very special player to understand).



Antwort von Jan:

Yes, I habs probably a little "mystery" explained.

VG
Jan



Antwort von beiti:

@ Caro
Perhaps we could once more of the interfaces and connections weggkommen and us on the key issue of concern: What do you want to film, and what product do you want to receive s.Ende? Then we propose a workflow targeted.

For example, the words "DVD in best quality" little benefit, as long as it is not clear whether you from the DVD media storage without regard to compatibility rausholen want the best, or whether you s.eine conventional (standard) DVD've thought that halt within best of restrictions possible.



Antwort von Muecke2:

Klink hallo ich mal ein me here - because I had the same problem.
I will me in May, June to buy a new camcorder (to 1500 ¬) and an HDV HDV + TV receiver.

I have cut the following system:

20'iMac Intel Core Duo 2GHz, 2GB RAM
software: Final Cut Express HD
dvi to video adapter - TV set as a control / monitor preview

I just liebäugle with canon HV20 or JVC GZ-HD 7

my problem - how do I export the materials in fce hd?

lg sleepless



Antwort von Cari:

The first thing I would like to thank for the answers. Now I finally understood. HDV is nothing for me. Schade.

At the moment, with the movies I SonyDCR-DVD505 DVD. Very nice camera, but unfortunately very impractical (best quality about 20 minutes, no merging of DVDs).

1.Also I would like either a hard or transfer miniDV camcorder. Important about 40 - 45 min s.Stück in very good quality film can be.

2. I film, especially in areas (family events), concerts, theatrical performances - that is, the camcorder with artificial light (Stage Light) deal.

3. I film a lot of sitting, so the camcorder handy enough. Weight is not decisive.

4. The sound is important. Conversations, bass, etc. - as a port for a Micro.

5. The video recordings on to play via IR port on my (normal) DVD Recorder. An editing via PC is not possible.

6. Price range: under 2000 Euro

7. HDV uses me nothing, not synonymous in years.

Of course, I am with a new camcorder to my SonyDCR-DVD505 DVD if possible improved.

I would be very pleased if you would have suggestions. Thank you. :-)



Antwort von beiti:

At 1) hard drive camcorder is opposite DVD camcorder, no improvement. If you are behind on DV connection on the DVD recorder going, did you double compression, thus further loss of quality. Recommended for your purpose only MiniDV or HDV.

At 2) Artificial lighting is s.sich no problem, some camcorders must however perform manual white balance, so that the picture is not color. If you are used to it, are only a few handles.
A bigger problem is the brightness. Stages are usually bright enough, in private homes, it often different (eg, 20-sqm room with 60-W bulb in the middle). Since fail most small camcorders, synonymous the cheaper 3-Chipper.

To 4) is an important point. Lately, these connections are often lacking. Even headphones connected to control is useful.

For 5) It provides a DV camcorder, the best conditions. An HDV camcorder is synonymous, then you need only to switch to DV output (then the picture for playback on DV Resolutionherunterkonvertiert, the DVD recorder can then just read it).
And why will not the PC in question? Did you not? ;)

To 7) Come out to. If you have medium-and long-term value to the lay 16:9-format (as well as all new television have, even the news has changed), you'll find in your price range just a few usable DV camcorder. There would be an HDV device is the better choice, even if it is just "down" set. According to the unanimous opinion surpasses the quality down HDV recording in terms of sharpness all DV camcorder. And you should see in a number of years, but times need for higher Resolutionbemerken, can you still on the HDV originals access.






Antwort von Muecke2:

hi cari,

mainly because you have family to celebrate theater and films,
and the material on uncut dvd burning
I assume that the the dvds look normal
TVs and DVD players have not yet 16:9,
therefore, for you would be a good MiniDV Camcorder
with external mic input and lowlightfähigkeiten
with optional switching to 16:9 (for later times)
ideal ...
Although I know the panasonic camcorder unspecified
but the old models (280/300/400) were always very
get good reviews and what could be for you ...
sony wärs in the old model trv900

gruß cj



Antwort von beiti:

Quote: I assume that the the dvds look normal
TVs and DVD players have not yet 16:9, Each DVD player can be 4:3 to 16:9 synonymous TVs show (95% of all DVDs are purchased so long ago in 16:9). Even though today many 4:3-Television in use, will in a few years look very different. I think already makes sense, now filming in 16:9. Family celebrations, etc. Just want you so synonymous later watch, not just now.

A good solution would be indeed a Panasonic GS280 and GS300. These models can be between 4:3 and 16:9 switching (both high in quality), and synonymous-Lowlight their skills are up to a certain extent, okay. Discouraged is the succession of models (GS320, etc.), microphone input with no more (to be synonymous in this forum already discussed). No wonder that the "old" models (where you still get) a bit expensive to be traded, but I would now have access.

One trend is clear: In the foreseeable future will be well-equipped camcorder only in HDV (and AVCHD) get, while the DV beginner models left.



Antwort von Muecke2:

"beiti" wrote: There would be an HDV device is the better choice, even if it is just "down" set. According to the unanimous opinion surpasses the quality down HDV recording in terms of sharpness all DV camcorder.

Thank you for the explanations.

I have a PC. BUT only with 256 MB and USB port. From video editing I do not talk, but only the transfer of the films is likely to be difficult. Or?

What I still do not understand: for example, both would be priced SonyHDR-HC3 or Canon HV20 HD camcorder inside. BUT since I only PAL recordings wants to do these camcorders have an advantage over anyway as Canon XM2?

16:9 interested me less, even though my show is the television. ;-)



Antwort von beiti:

Quote: I have a PC. BUT only with 256 MB and USB port. From video editing I do not talk, but only the transfer of the films is likely to be difficult. Or? Would have been possible (maybe with an older editing program that does not support real-time functions and has little system resources required), and a firewire interface can be modified at any time for about 10 euros fitted. But actually in your budget would be so much a new PC if you do not need money for an expensive camcorder raushaust ... ;)

Quote: What I still do not understand: for example, both would be priced SonyHDR-HC3 or Canon HV20 HD camcorder inside. BUT since I only PAL recordings wants to do these camcorders have an advantage over anyway as Canon XM2? As already said: HDV down detail is a bit sharper than original data, but makes it sooo much synonymous again not enough. In terms of light intensity would be an advantage in the XM2, but in comparison to the above HDV cams of course, a "chunk".



Antwort von Caro:

The Panasonic GS280 like me. A good tip, thanks. :-) Or would the Panasonic NV-GS 500 EG-S better suited?

At the moment I movies, as I said, with SonyDCR-DVD505.

Let's be honest: If I have a Panasonic GS280 or Panasonic NV-GS 500 EG-S purchase would bring to me an improvement over the recordings of SonyDCR-DVD505?

1. When Sony camcorder movies I only LP.
2. When I could Panasonic SP (ie approximately 40 min) film, but the transfer would have a PC or DVD recorder.

LG

Caro



Antwort von Muecke2:

"beiti" wrote: Would have been possible (maybe with an older editing program that does not support real-time functions and has little system resources required), and a firewire interface can be modified at any time for about 10 euros fitted.

My PC even has a firewire port (just discovered). :-))



Antwort von beiti:

"Anonymous" wrote: My PC even has a firewire port (just discovered). :-)) What else is there for a PC (clock speed, disk size, etc.)? Does he still have 1.1 or USB 2.0 (wg. may need additional hard drive)?



Antwort von Muecke2:

"beiti" wrote: "Anonymous" wrote: My PC even has a firewire port (just discovered). :-)) What else is there for a PC (clock speed, disk size, etc.)? Does he still have 1.1 or USB 2.0 (wg. may need additional hard drive)?

Fujitsu Siemens Scaleo J Desktop PC (AMD Sempron 3000 +, 256 MB RAM, 80GB HDD, DVD + / -/RW)

Technical Details
Mainboard: ¼ATX Via Sempron 754 AGP VGA
Processor: AMD Sempron 3000 + 754
Graphics: shared
Memory: 256 MB
Hard drive: 80 GB PATA
Optical drive: DVD Burners Double Layer
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Home

Could I order the recordings from Panasonic NV-GS 500 EG-S to the PC? Then the quality would certainly be better than when I film with a DVD recorder to burn?



Antwort von beiti:

Quote: Could I order the recordings from Panasonic NV-GS 500 EG-S to the PC? Then the quality would certainly be better than when I film with a DVD recorder to burn? I see no fundamental problem, as long as you do not use software, which necessarily requires more memory - and as long as you on the hard drive still have enough memory for the videos you (or an external disk is due). At 1 GB fit about 4 1 / 2 minutes DV - Video.
The quality of the DVDs is not finished with the transfer and not synonymous with the cut together (they are both lossless), but with the MPEG2 encoding when creating the DVD. If you have a good software and are using a slow 2-pass encoding apply, you exceed the quality of a DVD recorder (which is real-time encode it). However, there is poor software synonymous with a miserable DVD quality output. Some programs have only one synonymous unfavorable default and produce with the right attitude then better quality. For example, there were already several threads here about how the Magix Encoder best recruits.
The MPEG2 encoding can be almost any editing program as a last step, but there are separate encoder synonymous with sometimes a little better quality. What is for you out of the question, one would have to be based on your specific needs and computer knowledge to discuss.






Antwort von Caro:

Thank you for the explanation.

Then, now I know what camcorder I will buy. And everything else I try and then after by one. In any case, I try it with a software and look at the encoding.

Super, I am delighted at the many tips. :-))



Antwort von Caro:

Last question on the subject:

Has anyone experience with Panasonic, whether an additional Micro improves the sound and really bring something?

I film, as I said, for family celebrations or theatrical performances. So for conversation, singing, music.

Somewhere I have a bit of a read ME66. Useful addition or just throws money away?

Regards

Caro



Antwort von Muecke2:

Sorry, ME 66 is probably nothing. I would preferably a Micro, on the same camcorder-Battery or Battery runs.



Antwort von Markus:

"Caro" wrote: [...] I film theater.
In this you might be interested in the following treatise. In the course of that contribution is synonymous around the Sound.

->



Antwort von beiti:

Quote: I film, as I said, for family celebrations or theatrical performances. So for conversation, singing, music. Ideally always, the Microphone s.die sources close to Major. The theatrical performance would certainly be worth the effort. Whenever it is not (or would be too cumbersome), you will need a directional microphone on the camera.



Antwort von xAndreas84x:

Thank you very much. This morning I read in peace. ;-)

The Micro is already s.Camcorders be, otherwise it would not be possible for me. Also insensitive to speakers.

Many greetings once

Caro



Antwort von Jan:

@ Caro - you do not easily ...

You have to know synonymous with a professional guide as a Micro 1000 ¬ Sennheiser you can not have 10 meter wegstehen, you hear more noise than the real thing you want to record. The microphone should be near the record stand. Yes, the micro-directional effect put forward, so you can hear in front of more than a stereo - Ball Micro. The best sound is obtained but if the Micro in the vicinity.

Yes even the built Zoommikro GS 280 & 500 brings a little bit in transition, one hears of the front a little clearer and next, the side effect is weakened. Is it good by listening Headphones (before re-issues with Cable Panasonic K2KZ99S0002).

The Sennheiser ME 66 / K 6 Power adapter is included in the class as well to assess exactly how the Beyer Dynamic MCE 86 II (XLR with phantom power) / S II (without phantom power, XLR - XL 1 S and Pana DVC 60) or S II Cam ( 3.5 mm jack zb Pana GS 280 & 500) a price lower class. The best directional microphone in the price range.

I think grade in theater or similar manual Tonaussteuerung important, the feature has only the 500th GS
I got the error was made synonymous not auszupegeln if the sound entirely too high gepegelt is (override), no self-help software program is then swivel your way - I've made the mistake of synonymous, as I said s.Anfang my Filmerei.

Take at least the GS 500 with manual Tonaussteuerung, the level where you can control yourself, so that he never in the red zone abdrifftet (0-6 dB at Pana GS 500).

To Battery issue with the GS 500, yes I have a dynamic times of Sony stereo microphone (karaoke) without Battery s.der GS 500 is used.

Virtually all other microphones on the but of the microphone Battery operated, because they do not XLR / no phantom power via XLR has. That should not be a problem at all with good microphones Batteries create a few were without problems.

The above-mentioned Sony HDV models have at least one microphone attenuation, the level if you do not see (HC 1,3,5,7)
brings you but not so much synonymous.

You have my question answered yet, do you have at home an HD Ready Television / beamer or will you give you a purchase over the next months / years?

VG
Jan



Antwort von Caro:

"Jan" wrote:
You have my question answered yet, do you have at home an HD Ready Television / beamer or will you give you a purchase over the next months / years?

Hi Jan,

Thanks for all the explanations. At first I had really misconceptions. Meanwhile, things get a little better. :-)

Although I have a new television (16:9), but without HD Ready. No Beamer ... HD is the future when all technology (including blanks) is cheaper.

The Panasonic NV-GS 500 EG-S like me. This is likely to be a software MAGIX Video deLuxe 2006 (still have for my PC units).

On the topic of "Micro": It's just not possible that the Micro always is very close. Let us look at the situation, "Club". As you sit closer s.der stage times, next time away. In such cases it is unfortunately the best of the situation ... But an external Micro to use, but is certainly better (synonymous away if you sit next) than the internal?

I had already Micro "MCE72 Cam" views. The MCE 86 S II synonymous but Cam makes a good impression.

Even more times to practice: The microphones are in stereo. Will I get problems when people talk s.Tisch next door and the stage I filme? That should indeed not possible, a micro record. If so, I have a problem.

LG

Caro



Antwort von beiti:

Quote: I had already Micro "MCE72 Cam" views. The MCE 86 S II synonymous but Cam makes a good impression.

Even more times to practice: The microphones are in stereo. Will I get problems when people talk s.Tisch next door and the stage I filme? That should indeed not possible, a micro record. If so, I have a problem. You have to clearly decide: If you have a stereo micro (eg MCE 72) use, you take a very broad range of left to right (like the built-in Microphone, in terms of directivity and thus brings no benefit). If you removed the other hand, a next event as good as possible and to insulate the side sounds like, you need a real directional microphone (eg MCE 86) - and the operating principle is mono.
Either stereo or wide directivity. Both at the same time does not.






Antwort von Caro:

"Mono" sounds to me still somewhat outdated. ;-) Can a mono-Micro still in sound, as sound in the concert with a stereo micro-match?

Would not Mono more for people who have interviews or want direct talks?



Antwort von Markus:

"Caro" wrote: Can a mono-Micro still in sound, as sound in the concert with a stereo micro-match?
It uses several concert recordings mono microphone and mixing it into a stereo or How-synonymous-always-kind surround together. ;-)

BTW: First-term Microphones are always mono. Up to gaaanz few exceptions.



Antwort von beiti:

Quote: "Mono" sounds to me still somewhat outdated. ;-) Can a mono-Micro still in sound, as sound in the concert with a stereo micro-match? The distinction between mono and stereo has nothing, but nothing at all synonymous, with the sound quality. It's just about the use of multiple channels for surround sound.
If something is "obsolete", then it is the dual stereo - in times of 6-channel cinema sound.

Quote: Would not Mono more for people who have interviews or want direct talks? For the course, synonymous. :)
But you probably expect something impossible: You want a stage performance record in stereo, but want it from some distance with the directional microphone make. The work does not stop, because the closer the angle is recorded, the more of the stereo effect is flutes.
Either you have a stereo mic or a mono pair crossed directly in front of the stage, then you get a superior stereo effect and can when playing on a good investment synonymous acoustically, if an actor of left to right across the stage flits. This is stereo.
Or you have the whole thing from a distance record and want to suppress lateral noise, the car will be mono.
Clue: From a place, of which you naked with no ears perceive stereo effect, you can not synonymous record. The next stage of you get away, the more "monaural" is the sound.



Antwort von Caro:

Thank you for the explanations.

No, mine is already clear that for all possible situations Micro is not perfect. That, I expect not synonymous. (2 mono mics would be - for me - not possible. ;-))

Time, simply said: With the recording function of the internal microphone, I am satisfied. I would like to see of an additional Micro, that everything is still something "significant" is taken. Possible without great expense. But it must not be "perfect" to be, with noise, I can live synonymous. ;-)

I must not now say that I technically do not have much clue. ;-)

The Panasonic NV-GS 500 EG-S in conjunction with the MCE-72 CAM would be my choice at the moment. But I have read that this microcode fairly expensive to operate. Battery control I do not see a problem ... But I get (synonymous with no technical understanding) the fixing and the recording going? Had the "Verify the handle noise" in conjunction with the GS 500 difficult?

Simply said: I use the best Micro nothing if it would be difficult to operate. Review by the Recording Headphones for me is not possible. So I must be able to rely on the external micro work as well as the internal.

VG

Caro



Antwort von beiti:

Quote: Time, simply said: With the recording function of the internal microphone, I am satisfied. I would like to see of an additional Micro, that everything is still something "significant" is taken. Possible without great expense. [...] The Panasonic NV-GS 500 EG-S in conjunction with the MCE-72 CAM would be my choice at the moment. If you do want to hear more clearly remote, it must be an indicative Micro. The MCE-72 brings you nothing because (as already explained above).
I s.Deiner body and with your prior knowledge would not only me with the professional microphones mucking around, but a Sennheiser MKE 300 or Rode Videomic take. The bring you in any case an improvement and are easy to use.

Hear sound samples of the three times that I



Antwort von transsib:

"Anonymous" wrote: [...]
Technical Details
Mainboard: ¼ATX Via Sempron 754 AGP VGA
Processor: AMD Sempron 3000 + 754
Graphics: shared
Memory: 256 MB
Hard drive: 80 GB PATA
Optical drive: DVD Burners Double Layer
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Home

Could I order the recordings from Panasonic NV-GS 500 EG-S to the PC? Then the quality would certainly be better than when I film with a DVD recorder to burn?

Thus, you can but (almost) been properly cut. 1 GB of RAM and an additional clean hard drive and you have a circular system. If you have USB 2.0, you can even buy external hard drive. They have a good editing software like Premiere Elements - then you have a total of less than 300, - ¬ proper equipment.

If you say that you're ready, up to 2000, - ¬ for a camcorder out, but it now looks as if synonymous with a camcorder for 1000, - ¬ your requirements, it should s.den 300, - ¬ probably does not hang?

That would be a neat solution - from your camcorder directly to the recorder is totally distinctive * e (I must just say so - sorry). Whom do you want because with the uncut torture stuff?

Gruß, Oliver



Antwort von Caro:

[quote = "Transsib"] "Anonymous" wrote: [...]
That would be a neat solution - from your camcorder directly to the recorder is totally distinctive * e (I must just say so - sorry). Whom do you want because with the uncut torture stuff?

Hi Oliver,

for up to 2,000 euros, I had thought s.den Neupreis and not s.den direct purchase. ;-) I am pleased, therefore, reveals that I buying the camcorder come much cheaper. :-))

Beat not the hands über'm head together, but I like "natural" shots rather than cut. Video filmed, transfers to the PC, maybe a nice DVD menu and ready. So in thinking about me das :-)

It is so synonymous me a good camcorder important. I would not be far behind with video editing reside.



Antwort von Caro:

"beiti" wrote: If you do want to hear more clearly remote, it must be an indicative Micro. The MCE-72 brings you nothing because (as already explained above).

Thank you for the music samples. The differences were very clear.

I had therefore the MCE-72, because I thought that about 2 meters distance to the subject of a stereo micro units should still ...

Otherwise, I can synonymous times the Sennheiser MKE 300 chart. Thank you.



Antwort von Jan:

The MKE 300, I have long used.

If you then used Buying a SR 44 Battery (Silveroxid), which again hold 2x as long as the supplied 1 LR 44th I'm really determined 10-15 interviews per 15 min with a Battery.

The MKE 300 is only Kabelbruchanfällig, so actually a pure on the Camera / Tripod Microphone. You can see it already in hand but have to watch the cable is not so much to push.

For me a very good Richtrohrfür ca 120 ¬, fits well with the synonymous GS 500:

GS 500 with MKE 300

Also in wide use with 0.7 x there are no shadows from the Micro to be seen.

Easy to use, it is, there is only one on and off, a red lamp lights up briefly to let you know if the battery works.

VG
Jan






Antwort von Caro:

Thank you once again for the info.

Now I know what I buy. :-)