Newsmeldung von slashCAM:\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von Frank B.:
\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von ruessel:
The test sounds for 2012 not just sparkling. Perhaps what was done wrong in the test, some test results speak for it. I will lend itself to me time SOON and play a little ....
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
What I say now no concerns here in the forum. \u003cbr /\u003e As you get someone for testing a system or cinema camera in the fingers and one is surprised that the image results can even be topped of interlaced camcorder. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft
Antwort von Frank Glencairn:
What are you talking both about? \u003cbr /\u003e I think the test result is quite plausible. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Frank
Antwort von freezer:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
When I look at Page 3, the 1:1 diagrams, then I look at the following Liquiditations (progressive) \u003cbr /\u003e vertically, horizontally \u003cbr /\u003e FS100 800.600 \u003cbr /\u003e F3 1000 +, 950 \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e for example, the following resolution eineCanonXA10 \u003cbr /\u003e XA10 850, 600 (interlaced) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I wonder if the kit lenses compared to the F3 the FS100's image does not deteriorate significantly. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e (Pictures on the Panasonic TM 900 and X900M I will do without ;-)
Antwort von Frank Glencairn:
I ask myself more like an HD Camera higher than 540 LP can Disolve vertically. That's not yet been purely mathematical.
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
\u003chtml\u003e\u003cdiv class=\\u003chtml\u003e png "> \u003cimg alt=\
Antwort von Frank Glencairn:
I figure it still does not. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e We have a maximum vertical resolution of 1080 right? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Whom I now 1080 Black - 1 pixel high - lines about each other I'm a black bar and can even measure anything. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e So I have the black lines between white lines make it right \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e So I can therefore, ideally, only 540 LP see (b / w line pairs), or lie I completely wrong?
Antwort von handiro:
No. You are lying completely correct, but against the Panasonic TM 900 and X900M troll get updated very often only a cure .....
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
Then look at the graphic descriptions. \u003cbr /\u003e And the graphics are excerpts of the report in up EXPORTED website. \u003cbr /\u003e Exactly these values \u200b\u200bcan be read from the graph. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e If I meant by this. \u003cbr /\u003e It is easy to speak of Panasonic troll, Can I help it if camera-chart look like? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Now, the Question was called, what the tester incorrectly or the camera manufacturer must define the range of its products? \u003cbr /\u003e It's black and white visible. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e (In the video you can see the vertical lines.) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft
Antwort von Jan:
Why is the amateur chest X 900 M sharper than the 6 x 100 times more expensive FS? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e That has to look A.The cucumber 18-200 are not you? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e VG \u003cbr /\u003e January
Antwort von freezer:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Frank B.:
@ Low-flying aircraft \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Since you now and again, the XA10, as one would expect otherwise, the X900 in the illustrious Comparison with are incorporating want you to tell us something certainly synonymous. I guess the sharpness a.bezueglich the Panasonic. \u003cbr /\u003e But I do not know really. I've seen the images in the magnification to identify and think that the Panasonic paid for their sharpness with a huge edge steepening. Along the black lines in the ISO small representation are at the Panasonic color block artifacts visible. The FS 100 they seem to restrain himself. Your image has in fact, the slightly less sharp but still enjoyable. I strongly suspect that under the terms of the movies everyday synonymous step will be. I'm not synonymous sure if the Panasonic actually so much
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
The XA10 I have taken purely because it is popular. \u003cbr /\u003e I've found just the pure graphics, everyone can see what is going on. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Then check out the lovely times with empty margins at the bottom left of the gray Areas of the F3. Or above the underlying T. \u003cbr /\u003e If the test a.Fully engage the settings? \u003cbr /\u003e (The F3 is significantly sharpened) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft
Antwort von Frank B.:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Predator:
\u003cdiv class=\
