Frage von -ssSonyY-:
Hello
I'm fairly recently Steadicam crazy .. ^ ^
and I'm busy at practice ..
I have on Youtube a fairly ccoles video of Johan Sandklef found
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=EkP2xEVUFXY&feature=related
I think it's really great and interesting synonymous just to look ..
now but this takes the making of only 4:45 .. and I'm looking for similar videos of live studio broadcasts (with Music wärs s.liebsten me, because as is usually the best rides are:) ...
yes maybe someone knows a few good videos ..
Antwort von PowerMac:
Yes, this is a good operator. Very many of which do not exist.
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
Yes, what happened to me synonymous notice is that he is working without assistant. Most other operators do have an assistant to the operator ... and focus pulls ...
But who actually makes you manages Focal and focus?
Antwort von PowerMac:
From the picture or director of a small-picture director Steadicam next stage.
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
Did I just wundebaren the film "shining" views.
The most impress me, so the Steadicam Fahten ;-)
and the making of you can see Garrett Brown run. He holds the Steadicam but only s.Sled? Nevertheless, the relatively good rides! Or should we run when the Gimbal not hold?
Antwort von RickyMartini:
Here gibbet the right equipment - for every budget:
http://www.marcotec-shop.de/de/products/cat_108/index.htm
Antwort von Chezus:
It lies with me still at home rum in the cupboard:
http://www.marcotec-shop.de/de/products/cat_5/detail_19.htm
it would give her if she wants one. Is too hard;)
What will probably earn s.einem evening?
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
it would give her if she wants one. Is too hard;)
yes I take it ;-)
Although hab schon ne Flycam .. But I think the is synonymous ned schlecht ^ ^
Antwort von Johannes:
It lies with me still at home rum in the cupboard:
http://www.marcotec-shop.de/de/products/cat_5/detail_19.htm
it would give her if she wants one. Is too hard;)
What will probably earn s.einem evening? I give kannste synonymous ;-)
Well, I think around 2000, but it is synonymous to see above it free or is bound transmitter. Sender gets Bound and determined not so much.
Antwort von steadyfreak:
l
Antwort von Debonnaire:
Chezus Hello!
What would be for you because a feasible and fair price for this equipment? Make me look a realistic offer directly to my e-mail.
Thank you very much!
Antwort von Chezus:
sorry, do not misunderstand.
Steadicam above is outside of my budget. Was just fun, that I have to give away.
Bin themselves in search of a suitable Steadicam.
Hab mir Fly2 of the A1 film technology angel eight
Antwort von Johannes:
Jaja with irony should be here in the forum to be careful, there may be one or the other here is certainly of a song to sing.
Vll. Steady Drive Of what?
Antwort von Chezus:
Had probably still one or the other to make smiley more ...
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
Had probably still one or the other to make smiley more ... ;-)
So the irony here would not understand, should not really alone in front of the door go!
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
Hello!
I would once again a small issue because of the Steadicam.
I have very much lately, but unfortunately I have a bit of a problem with the balance of the system.
Namely: Currently I have a drop-time of 4-5 seconds, but the Steadi is just when I left, forward-looking feel. When I use the camera to the rear can watch (Don Juan) is not perfectly balanced.
Now I have tried, all offset by the post I made a little longer. So far so good, then I have only a drop time of approximately 1-2 seconds. (Although I am only at about 1-2cm have extended!)
Now the question, what should I do?
Dear post completely exit and less weight on it do?
Or short and more weights?
Weights rather close to the center or outside?
What's even more for tips on balancing?
Would be great if I could help somebody else, because I no longer come next ..!
Antwort von Freehouse:
Sell my Steadycam, with interest: http://forum.slashcam.de/biete-abc-steadycam-in-topzustand-fur-nur-750-euro-vt69822.html
Top condition and good price!
Just watch ...
Gruß Markus
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
I would not really annoying, but I do it anyway ;-)
Can you give me all the tricks and tips for balancing a Steadicam type ..? That would be really great ..
Or perhaps the question:
Is it better to use a drop time of approximately 5 seconds to have to take in Purchase, the Steadicam is not quite perfect is ..
or
ne drop time of 2 seconds for the Steadi exactly aligned to have.
clearly would be the ideal mix, but the building I do not really ..
Thank you s.alle who dei nehem time and I might answer! :)
Antwort von crazy-spy:
Had original Tiffen Steadicam-VHS that are s.Beispiel the Steadicam SK wicjhtige show everything ... called "Steadicam SK Training Video, 35 minutes, in Pal and NTSC available, the latter OVP ;-)
Vlg
Basti
Antwort von Axel:
I would not really annoying, but I do it anyway ;-)
Can you give me all the tricks and tips for balancing a Steadicam type ..? That would be really great .. First: The balance, the point s.dem the camera, without angeschubst to be just stands (tripod plate adjustment).
Then (quote from an old thread):
Shake that thing often in small pendulum motion, the weight is too high. Shake it in large sheets, the weight is too small. A camera should be perfectly balanced if you anstößt, swinging back (always something about the point beyond), but after such a shuttle movement immediately stopped.
Antwort von shodushitanaka:
Dear post completely exit and less weight on it do?
Or short and more weights? Short and more weights - is more stable.
Gruss
Antwort von Axel:
Short and more weights - is more stable. Saaag times ...
Have you had actually bought the Flycam 5000? My buddy and I have since an estimation problem. We buy and use equipment in common. For the Canon A1 (2.3 kg), the 5000 probably okay. But what is with the SonyEX3 (3.8 kg)? The need then the 6000? And is the 6000 vice-versa too big for the A1? Knotty box ....
Antwort von shodushitanaka:
Hi Axel.
Yes, I've bought it, but the footage has not yet promised reingestellt ..... that you remember but synonymous;)
For my 5000 the FX1 is perfectly adequate, did not weigh it yet, so I'll say what concrete. the description says up to 5kg loads.
I think it is balanced, the 6000 with less weight (maximum as indicated) to use than the other way, ie: the 5000 with the EX3 to the maximum load (+ Battery, Light, matte, etc ...) to drive.
Gruss
PS: I'm happy for the beginning with the 5000, but have not yet reingestellt footage, because I can not simply walk through the woods will. Maybe you have an idea of what shots with a tripod so the application can bring ..
Antwort von HansMaulwurf:
Can only give information without the jacket:
With the XH-A1, and short Movietube Lens is it really no longer ausbalancierbar. Can not say exactly how hard the whole then, probably about 5 kg.
Hab `s from me and tried Jux NEN perceived herniated disc fetched.
Antwort von Axel:
Can only give information without the jacket:
With the XH-A1, and short Movietube Lens is it really no longer ausbalancierbar. Can not say exactly how hard the whole then, probably about 5 kg.
Hab `s from me and tried Jux NEN perceived herniated disc fetched. I need something not to "drive" to make recordings, I thought it rather, in relatively static settings on a tripod to avoid. But the thing with the Movietube brings me to the idea that with the whole Adapterkram the whole thing, unfortunately, difficult enough for 6000. Without having tried it: With an adapter, you can definitely not a "vehicle" shots, I think even with the shoulder brace is extremely difficult, and I think that during the recording s.FollowFocus turn, brings in the balance. Perhaps we buy synonymous both, I am not so with a vest to run through the area, and 150 ¬ are probably more to get over ...
Thanks for the input. Otherwise someone a hint?
Antwort von Johannes:
Can only give information without the jacket:
With the XH-A1, and short Movietube Lens is it really no longer ausbalancierbar. Can not say exactly how hard the whole then, probably about 5 kg.
Hab `s from me and tried Jux NEN perceived herniated disc fetched.
I need something not to "drive" to make recordings, I thought it rather, in relatively static settings on a tripod to avoid. But the thing with the Movietube brings me to the idea that with the whole Adapterkram the whole thing, unfortunately, difficult enough for 6000. Without having tried it: With an adapter, you can definitely not a "vehicle" shots, I think even with the shoulder brace is extremely difficult, and I think that during the recording s.FollowFocus turn, brings in the balance. Perhaps we buy synonymous both, I am not so with a vest to run through the area, and 150 ¬ are probably more to get over ...
Thanks for the input. Otherwise someone a hint? If you rent a radio sharpness, you need not touch the camera so it does not come from the balance. Furthermore, to say the more weight you have to be quiet, it is thanks to the laws of inertia. We also post at the Lever Act, therefore, says most of a long post with little weights because you will generally not have as much weight.
The Flycam 5000 / 6000 will be so that the lower end already weighs as much as you already have a Camera size probably about 2kg. need. So are you with the xh s.hart s.der border. I think you can, however, the most since 6000 take with a Canon XL2 on Flycam being advertised and will be used synonymous and synonymous this weighs only about 2 kg.
Antwort von Axel:
Thank you very much. Heavy is better. Oh, I'm just too easy ....
Antwort von -ssSonyY-:
So, so many thanks for your tips ..
habs now I tried:
So generally speaking is a short post with more weights of certain advantage, but only if it is the feather or the hands endure ..
3kg with my camera on the Flycam 5000 (because of the springs) is not a problem ..
Antwort von crazy-spy:
If synonymous halt drauf s.was you want to do ... Keyword high fashion, lowmode and co ... I personally prefer NEN short post, because it makes the system more compact.
