Frage von Johannes:
Hello,
in the coming months I will be for my exam (10 class) a Skilled write for two subjects. I thought I take my time a Steadycam detail the Lupp and writes for more specialist physics.
Since the cross-skilled to be I thought I was the second specialist art and tell when you have a Steadycam uses. Now I wanted to look at the directors among you ask, When is it a Steadycam a preference would be in the whole area of the film because it so often in EB backgrounds are not real. So first I thought for a follower perspective so if you practically from the eyes of a man wants to film. That's what being synonymous but me so haggard. I hope you could me give a few backgrounds.
So please gestallterische reasons and not because you have a dolly for the rails provides "or something. Thanks in advance.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Technical Answer: For reasons of practicality, a Steadicam technically make sense if a dolly would be too costly or Dolly can not be used / allowed (uneven ground, turning restrictions, budget, etc.)
Cinematic Answer: Steadicam is in 99% of cases of aesthetic end in itself and thus completely superfluous. In a subjective Steadicam
can fit. From the viewpoint of the imaging device when you Steadicamsequenzen often in the situation that you follow someone in real time, so "live" here is something like a person experiencing a record of what a protagonist makes. The image concept is "we just follow the actor". In this way the film is supposed to be a record of what real people actually did. But this has nothing with "film" to be done. Film is formed by juxtaposing the intersection of unabgewandelten images. It provides a picture that says something, it cuts to a new picture and then brings the two pictures into a context by context association. That's exciting and cinematic. To tell you a story cinematically. And that suggest Eisenstein and Mamet for the film before. By cutting! With the Steadicam is a film for better play. The best example of that: "The Russian Ark". This is a story. A film that tells the average, by association, by unabgewandelte pictures, this is a story! No narrative.
People you with Eisenstein and Mamet, synonymous Jarmusch and Lynch help.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
John Gude
Very good idea that you can do what.
Bzgl. Physics
Explain the ratio of springs and clamping forces and / or commuting.
See here or
here synonymous with http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hookesches_Gesetz
To do this, nor the steady building of systems and materials used in the note or explain.
.................................................. ................................
In art
You explain the use of the terms film and new perspective - ie how Powermac said, what distinguishes a normal to a Steadycam Shot.
How will the views on the Look out, (with recent example s.besten Clip)
Why it may make sense to the viewer s.eine new approached to lead.
What gives this man with vision.
What can you and what you can not do with Steadycam / show.
So in this direction would I go thinking you can already write a good job.
Good luck and maybe you can after work so the two projects (or parts thereof) to publish here.
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von Chezus:
What Powermac says true, but I think come to Steadicam garnicht more trips already, because they are often so well integrated in the film so subtly and into the action with are installed.
for example if at 2 Cast entertained.
Shot, shot counter, etc. several cuts, people are additionally in another room. These provided the Camera (not followers)
Sowas garnicht on notice, so it should not be synonymous.
Where the Steadicam is very much use has been: Lola Rennt
Antwort von DWUA:
... I thought I take my time a Steadycam detail the Lupp and writes for more specialist physics.
Since the cross-skilled to be I thought I was the second specialist art and tell .... Can you still go?
Expert Cross and simply moving to specialist SPORTS change?
Then did you theory (physics) and practice (sports) in a
Sense of context - could even everything documented.
And when it comes on top of the artistic work s.deiner school
is, one can not grumble ...
;))
Antwort von Chezus:
Connect it with sports, show this clip and you have won:
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Or the construction here ;-))
http://www.mk-v.com/?page_id=163
Wirklich geiles video system here!
Antwort von DWUA:
Connect it with sports, show this clip and you have won:
If even for the stupid "Pauker" too simple.
;))
John is primarily to ensure compliance
its task, and that's obviously a theoretical nature.
But:
Even to describe the experience is still easier
And more convincing than waffle about "art" to a
10. Graders no man buy anyway.
;))
Antwort von Johannes:
So for those interested in it, today I have my registration slip and will therefore submit the technical work in physics and art, but art is the smaller part. It is precisely that it is specialized Cross. As already said the main part will be physics.
