Frage von anna:
Dear people!
A question about the workflow ...
A concert recording with 3 cameras to match the sound recorded on the DAT was cut.
But in order to be able to cut without a lot of care I would like from each of the three clips with the Fremdton form a unit without all the material again to save. Is this possible?
Aaand makes any sense?
So far I have it with a kind of negative-cutting attempts in the timeline but instead there must be a meaningful synonymous variant, at least I hope so.
I would be super grateful if someone could give me some tips how I approach the s.besten. Or refers me to previous discussions.
... I stepped straight into the shoes of a little too big Fixanstellung as a film editor at a small production company in Tokyo and introduce myself horribly here s.bei my first cuts. at least I would be grateful for some help in a language that I understand synonymous - haha.
With best wishes from Japan.
anna
oh yes ... It is dv material to be edited in Final Cut Pro.
Antwort von Axel:
Salut Anna.
I recommend the
multiclip with Final Cut Pro - editing, in which although all tracks in the timeline, lie on the selected camera perspective can be conducted by a viewer split by type of cutting live comfortably in a control room, because you see all the versions in parallel (Manual : multiclip, real-time preview requires relatively) fast Calculator.
The premise is that you sync all the Future and the sound in the timeline. For this it is s.günstigsten when recording all the cameras and the DAT have without interruption. Then a striking picture-and Tonevent search, highlight, and the markers can be superimposed by
snapping into place.
Good luck!
Antwort von anna:
works very nice ... 'm just s.ausprobieren
Thanks for the quick response.
