Infoseite // TEST Nikon D3100 -> better than Canon?

Frage von DSLR-Freak:


Hello everybody,

Test pictures for the new Nikon D3100 are still scarce. New in the network the following is very interesting test video:


If there actually have been filmed with a D3100, the result is sensational. I mean better than Canon's models with respect to sharpness and natural colors. What do you think?

The AF is of course especially for those subjects not to use them. Where is the Camera synonymous know what to make sharp ...
But that is synonymous in the nature of things. At this depth an AF system will always have it hard. Nevertheless be interesting to be portraits. What will work here the AF system. The identification of the sharp wrongful object here should be easier.

Noise with prof. Application are virtually no preference, since one with ext. Devices can work.

What do you think?



Antwort von B.DeKid:

And what is there now for your Meihnung better?



Antwort von NEEL:

Beautiful pictures. Only two trifles would IMHO still urgently required:
- 50p
- Camera Wizard Schärfeziehen



Antwort von DSLR-Freak:

"B. DeKid" wrote: And what is there now for your Meihnung better?

Colors and sharpness are particularly mE significantly better than the Canon 7d/550d.
But a comparison here is to bring clarity.



Antwort von B.DeKid:

Well you can defenieren basis of the present recording is not really clear.

Better stay a little longer wait times and then schaaun.

MfG
B. DeKid



Antwort von deti:

"DSLR-Freak wrote: If there actually have been filmed with a D3100, the result is sensational. I mean better than Canon's models with respect to sharpness and natural colors. What do you think?
Hm? Better? So as you can see above all a very slow rolling shutter, in which each pivot looks like jelly. The Picture's impression, as usual in the consumer area, colorful and rich in contrast to what makes a post-processing significantly.

Deti



Antwort von pilskopf:

You wonder why you do not always synonymous, the first moving pictures of such a camera of such Vollnoobs be placed online to have no inkling of the matter and probably deliberately so shitty recordings produce because otherwise we will not explain it synonymous. So why that is anyway? What are these 'pipes behind such a Cam? Which by the subject or the like and then report on a video function? Who me to clarify? This can only synonymous but people of the press to be the test but why such a device which then behave more like a never held a Cam in your hand? That does not make sense.

So the only thing I can judge is the operator of a Vollpfeife in the field camera technique.



Antwort von Jan:

Hi,

this shows once again that an amateur with a reasonable Stillimage done something good fortune can (thanks to the good part, Nikon automatic), but in a film danebenschiesst complete.


Let's see what comes of Canon still running 1000 and 450 D of synonymous yes, it is safe in his successor a mediocre movie mode to be installed ....


VG
January



Antwort von DSLR-Freak:

"Deti" wrote: The Picture's impression, as usual in the consumer area, colorful and rich in contrast to what makes a post-processing significantly.

Deti
Well, you as a "professional" can turn straight yes or on flat, right?






Antwort von DSLR-Freak:

People, you should not be so much talk about the cameraman. It is about image quality! And that is tiptop!

For one or the other, I might do again on a different subject
"Poor cameramen on YouTube - A conspiracy theory" - of those who know it had to

Have a look at the video at 1080p in 12 seconds on the street!
I'm saying: The camera stands most likely from Canon. The GH1 with the hack has already done so anyway. The successor to the D90, the D7000 will probably hopefully a blast. That was the D90 then synonymous.



Antwort von deti:

"DSLR-Freak wrote: Well, you as a "professional" can turn straight yes or on flat, right?
My willingness to compromise keeps very limited as I wanted to discuss with a "Fan Boy" about the serious use of such a camera.

Deti



Antwort von DSLR-Freak:

"Deti" wrote:
My willingness to compromise keeps very limited as I with Fan Boy "about the serious use of such a camera would discuss" one.

Deti

What does that mean? How serious?
Please do not just of 'fanboy talk'.

The Nikon D3100 does not currently have full manual control, which is why a professional use is eliminated in some respects with the existing firmware. The message is but the image quality. And what will bring us the D7000?

Nikon D7000 (rumors):

* 100% viewfinder
* Dual SD memory card slots
* Magnesium alloy body
* 16.2MP CMOS sensor (DX)
* EXPEED 2
* 1080 HD video @ 24, 25, 30, 50, 60, 100, 120p?
* Data rate 16 Mbit / s to 48 Mbit / s
* 20 min video recording (up from 5 minutes on the D90)
* Save images from video (similar to the d3s)
* AF during video
* Stereo mic input for video
* 6 fps
* Virtual horizon (like the D300s)
* One touch video and / or live view (similar to the D3100)
* Improved ISO range: 100-25600
* 39 AF points
* Wireless flash
* Weather proof (like the D300s)
* New battery system
* Expected price: $ 1,199 for body only
* Swivel display?

Sounds really exciting, right?



Antwort von B.DeKid:

Yes sounds exciting, and next?

As I said, first come onto the market will be the darling and then see next moment everything sounds exciting to 9.21.

But as I see the Nikon will have a disadvantage because they pay too dependent of its photo mode Sonysind and more attention as the video mode to wait for long time and drink tea.

...............

PS: I think yes einbasteln already the synonymous Nikon Picure a function of the profiles is because if you want to be shown the video, the image display function and eventual dictated would run shoot which is indeed an own goal.

And if the AF can conjure Canon times as they had him at the XL cams for years under control then this RaterRater mill pack of Nikon eh ;-))



MfG
B. DeKid