Frage von Spinal:
Hi,
I'm new here, I'm from Cologne and had been about 5 years Panasonic NV-GS300, and watch movies a lot, that has to do with cars (race, tourist trips, etc.).
Now I would like to enter the world of HD and have a budget of about 800 - 1100 ¬.
Very important to me are a good Wide Angleund a good low light performance.
In addition I would like a slow motion or 50p recording.
A good image stabilization would be synonymous nice, because I have shot almost entirely out of hand.
In my immediate choice come SonyCX550 and the Panasonic HS700.
The Panasonic has a good wide angle, 50p recording, many manual controls and mediocre low light performance.
The Sonyhat a very good wide angle, much discussed in diffuse light, a slow-motion function and a lot of nice things (Night Shot, GPS, very good display).
But the big question, I will wait until the new cameras? Could SonyCX700 or 690 or even 560 have a better low-light performance than the present, plus better wide angle, 50p recording and maybe even the other niceties.
The Panasonic TM900 get a better display, better noise suppression and more I do not know.
A very hot potato has, in my view for Canon synonymous in the fire. The RF G10. Maybe she has the best picture quality, good low light response Angleund Wide (assumptions), but one can hardly take pictures, as far as I know there is no slow motion and 50p recording is not synonymous provided.
I have because of the low-light performance even bothered to take pictures of excerpts from the video asset test videos and to make comparison. I know that there are pictures of Slashcam synonymous, but I came with the screenshots clearly better. I hope this is ok to publish.
Appearances of a light is about 20 lux on the pictures at the top of the SonyCX520, middle and bottom of the SonyCX550 the Panasonic HS700.
http://img14.imageshack.us/i/puppeo.jpg/
http://img24.imageshack.us/i/blumenah.jpg/
The last picture you can see very well the difference of synonymous wide angle.
http://img130.imageshack.us/i/blumefern.jpg/
The SonyCX520 I have taken purely with, because of many to be the best camera with low light performance is traded, so I have almost taken as a reference and find the result to be honest almost frightening.
Well, what should I do? Is there perhaps some alternatives that I have overlooked?
If the cameras may total "adjusted" they are so "bad"?
I can evaluate synonymous honestly not quite the difference to my current MiniDV Camera.
Thanks in advance and best regards,
Spinal
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... The big question is, I wait until the new cameras? ... The answer to that only you can give yourself, but if you want the new does not necessarily next week, I would definitely wait for the initial tests and reviews of new products. The specifications of the Sony can at least hope it will be worth the wait could.
Antwort von Jan:
Wait .....
Canon HF G 10 could be very good, we are waiting for the laboratory tests ......
VG
January
Antwort von Jitter:
If you can do without the wide-angled design of the HF G 10, one is for 700 ¬ less (List price) with the Canon HF M41 guaranteed the same image quality obtained (including identical View Finder).
